
nibhaz
Audioholic Chief
GreenJelly said:This is crazy Nibahz...
Sources
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/Category/category_slc.asp?CatId=450
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=search&ci=4165&Q=&O=NavBar
http://www.cablesnmor.com/rca-cables.html
http://www.installer.com/rca/
http://www.epinions.com/Cables_and_Connectors--reviews--rca_cable
http://www.ramelectronics.net/html/audio_toslink_cables.html
http://www.monstercable.com/home_av/video_cables/composite-rca.asp
http://www.electronixwarehouse.com/car/accessories/rca-cables.htm
http://www.orbaudio.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATS&Category=15&gclid=CInDmeuRpYkCFRZXFQodP3uSUA
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-rxnwSYBEObO/cgi-bin/ProdGroup.asp?g=23111
http://www.trianglecables.com/rca-cables-three-conductors.html
http://shopping.yahoo.com/s:Cables:4168-Brand=RCA
http://www.cablestogo.com/categories.asp?cat_id=2000&engine=adwords!654&keyword=(rca+cables)&gclid=CMTNpLOSpYkCFTcrFQodTXVQUQ
http://www.surplussales.com/Connectors/RCA-2.html
I can keep posting places that sell "RCA CABLES"...
But I guess ALL these people... 4,260,000 Results on google... are all false, and are all wrong on the terminology. Slang or not... Everyone knows what a RCA Cable is, except for you.
Ofcourse we could also call it RCA Composite Cable, RCA Video Cable, RCA Stereo Cables, etc...
And your point is?
I've already shown you how your use of the terminology is incorrect and how justifying your use of the term is illogical.
I just Googled god: 422,000,000 results!
Does this large number kicked back by Google prove anything?
No, I didn't think so.
You can continue to spew rubbish but what’s the point?