Scammed By Timika

[GO-NAD!]

If you shoot someone, they will come to your residence and remove ALL firearms from you, not just the one used. I read on a site regarding lethal force and they quite specifically said it does not state anywhere that they will be returned to you either.

Not to mention, you cannot protect PROPERTY with lethal force, and you also cannot harm someone after the threat has ended. If you shoot someone who is fleeing and they die, you will be charged with murder. You may not be convicted depending on circumstances, but I wouldn't take that bet over something that can be replaced.

Really? I don't think they'd even do that up here. If it has been deemed self-defence, why would they confiscate your firearms?

 

[Bryceo]

If you shoot someone, they will come to your residence and remove ALL firearms from you, not just the one used. I read on a site regarding lethal force and they quite specifically said it does not state anywhere that they will be returned to you either.

Not to mention, you cannot protect PROPERTY with lethal force, and you also cannot harm someone after the threat has ended. If you shoot someone who is fleeing and they die, you will be charged with murder. You may not be convicted depending on circumstances, but I wouldn't take that bet over something that can be replaced.

My poor sister had a gun to her head when the robber was shoot it was self defence no chargers where laid and they gave the gun back after it was over

 

[Adam]

My poor sister had a gun to her head when the robber was shoot it was self defence no chargers where laid and they gave the gun back after it was over

I'm pretty sure that he was talking about the U.S. Btw, I sure hope that your sister is okay. That's not a good situation at all.

Btw, John, I'd never heard that before.

 

[Bryceo]

I'm pretty sure that he was talking about the U.S. Btw, I sure hope that your sister is okay. That's not a good situation at all.

Btw, John, I'd never heard that before.

Arh i see I figured that some maythink the rules applie allover the world witch I find silly as they dont She was in shock for a few months after that she's okay now dosnt work at night time any more she's petrafired of closing up
But after some therapy she has put the robbery behiend her I personally believe if I was in her situation I'd have done the same thing

 

[mike c]

wait. bryceo is in canada?

and there are robberies in canada?

being robbed in canada = bet in the lottery immediately?

 

[Bryceo]

wait. bryceo is in canada?

and there are robberies in canada?

being robbed in canada = bet in the lottery immediately?

Haha no Australia

 

[lsiberian]

Not to mention, you cannot protect PROPERTY with lethal force, and you also cannot harm someone after the threat has ended. If you shoot someone who is fleeing and they die, you will be charged with murder. You may not be convicted depending on circumstances, but I wouldn't take that bet over something that can be replaced.

In Texas you can shoot anyone who makes you feel threatened on your property. The jury will almost always side with the shooter if you have a lawyer worth anything. Unless you are unreasonable in your use of the firearm.

 

[monkish54]

In Texas you can shoot anyone who makes you feel threatened on your property.

Maybe we're too strict here in Cali..but...WTF!

LOL

 

[KEW]

The minor flaw in that approach is that Niki would then have a taste for human flesh...and I sleep in the same house as her.

Good point!

You need to stash the leg for about three weeks in the basement (or any place that doesn't get too cold and Niki can't get to) then make the video!

Now, Niki will have acquired a taste for decaying human flesh!

Zombiepocalypse Guard Dog aka "Niki the White, Slaeyer of Zombies"

 

[j_garcia]

My poor sister had a gun to her head when the robber was shoot it was self defence no chargers where laid and they gave the gun back after it was over

That is different, that is a threat to life not property. Fully justified and legal.

Really? I don't think they'd even do that up here. If it has been deemed self-defence, why would they confiscate your firearms?

THREAT is the key word, and it is the same in California. If you are threatened, you are justified in firing, however I am fairly certain in all states the same will apply: If you end the situation and someone and they are now running away and you shoot and kill them it is murder. I'd check your laws before trying it. I will find the article.

 

[Adam]

You need to stash the leg for about three weeks...

Brilliant plan! Too bad that we only have three days left.

 

[KEW]

Unless you are unreasonable in your use of the firearm.

Is shooting someone's leg off okay?

 

[Adam]

Is shooting someone's leg off okay?

What kind of hand cannon do you have?

Oh, wait...that's not what I meant...

 

[adwilk]

 

[KEW]

Brilliant plan! Too bad that we only have three days left.

You may still have time. It'll take them awhile to figure out what happened and get organized into a proper zombie cohort. Then, they'll go for the low-hanging fruit (nursing homes, hospitals, etc.) first.
And, if I can qoute the sheriff from one of the original "Night of the living Dead" movies, "They're dead, they don't move too fast"

 

[j_garcia]

 

[lsiberian]

Maybe we're too strict here in Cali..but...WTF!

LOL

Yeah plenty of crazy folks will greet strangers at the door with a shotgun. And yes there are plenty of legal gun owners who have no business having them here.

There are also those who will chase you off their property with a gun. We have large rural areas and you can't rely on the police to come save you in a bad situation. That said I wish more folks would use a Tazer or Mace first.

Never shoot the leg if you want to just injure someone. Shoot in the butt. The leg has a major artery.

 

[KEW]

Originally Posted by KEW View Post
Is shooting someone's leg off okay?

What kind of hand cannon do you have?

Oh, wait...that's not what I meant...

I was thinking more along the lines of a "tear along perforation" proposition.

Let's see you innuendo that!

 

[j_garcia]

There are also those who will chase you off their property with a gun. We have large rural areas and you can't rely on the police to come save you in a bad situation. That said I wish more folks would use a Tazer or Mace first.

Agreed, non-lethal should always be the first response. That's also the difference between threat and concern: someone in my house is a threat. On my property is only a concern unless they give me a reason otherwise. Where we live, people don't tend to trespass because firearms are a given

 

[Bryceo]

We do it right the first time around!