D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
I suspect though there will be people out there who support the banning regardless of what the statistics say. I mean if trans is categorically a mental health issue than that could lead to banning firearms for all gays.
 
H

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
I said using statistics to prove blue cities have a higher crime rate and therefore justifying using federal intervention. Trump reads and uses crime statistics, and then decides a course of action? Doesn't sound like him. No I think he's going into blue cities regardless and uses that as part of his political agenda against the left.
So, lowering crime is a problem? I disagree.
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
So, lowering crime is a problem? I disagree.
The level of ignorance in your post is amazing. We shall go into every city that has an unusually high level of crime regardless of if it is blue or red. If there are more blue cities than red so be it. But we will go into all of them.
 
H

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
The level of ignorance in your post is amazing. We shall go into every city that has an unusually high level of crime regardless of if it is blue or red. If there are more blue cities than red so be it. But we will go into all of them.
"Shall", or will? There's a difference.

Obviously, you oppose Trump sending troops into Blue areas- are you opposed if they go into Red areas?
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
"Shall", or will? There's a difference.

Obviously, you oppose Trump sending troops into Blue areas- are you opposed if they go into Red areas?
Shall or will is irrelevant. You're avoiding my point. Why you would turn this into I would go into red cities only and not blue is mind boggling. I just said, If there are more blue cities than red so be it. But we will go into all of them.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top