On Trump

[GO-NAD!]

Don't congrat me. I voted Harris. But it doesn't mean I'm incapable of seeing why the country is a red blanket.

Democrats are viewed as intellectual effete looking down on 52 out of every 100 people walking around them as 'common folk'.

That has a cost and, IMO, rightly so. If you're that level of asshole you should probably be rewarded for it.

So, is the view that 48 out of 100 people are 'intellectual effete' any more accurate?

In the end, 52 is still a larger number than 48, so that view wins. But, it also means that many voters ignored policy platforms.
Kamala Harris’s economic policy slate more popular than Trump’s – poll | US elections 2024 | The Guardian

 

[TankTop5]

TankTop5 is an example of that.

Fact, high school dropout here. Homeowner, sent kids to private school, owned a medical company, have a construction company and about to start another company. Luckily insulting people based on education just doesn’t carry the weight it once did. I don’t even need a college degree to know you’re an idiot.

 

[Dude#1279435]

Nope. You're not seeing what you're seeing. A favorite replay from the Trump era.

 

[Dude#1279435]

Kinzinger was one of the better Republicans who spoke out.

 

[Dude#1279435]

As probably obvious by now, Trump's political style is WWE/Jerry Springer. Good one though. I wanna say a YTer but cannot remember.

 

[GO-NAD!]

The FDA is forcing Costco to recall 80,000lbs of butter because it doesn’t have, contains milk warning on the label. This is why Americans voted for Trump.

If this is the reason they voted for Trump, I would suggest that they expand the list of criteria on which they base their voting preferences.

Actually, there is a more likely reason for electing him:

Misinformation Decided the US Election | by J. Bradford DeLong - Project Syndicate

J. Bradford DeLong asks why Donald Trump’s supporters overwhelmingly held a distorted view of the country’s situation.

www.project-syndicate.org

 

[Dude#1279435]

If this is the reason they voted for Trump, I would suggest that they expand the list of criteria on which they base their voting preferences.

Actually, there is a more likely reason for electing him:

Misinformation Decided the US Election | by J. Bradford DeLong - Project Syndicate

J. Bradford DeLong asks why Donald Trump’s supporters overwhelmingly held a distorted view of the country’s situation.

www.project-syndicate.org

I don't think they held a distorted view of the situation. Gas was $2. Grocery price inflation etc. They think Trump can do better economically. However, I'm sure his behavior is rolled into it as well. Ugh.

 

[jinjuku]

I've yet to see any 'news' site that was whipping the horse for Harris show an

So, is the view that 48 out of 100 people are 'intellectual effete' any more accurate?

In the end, 52 is still a larger number than 48, so that view wins. But, it also means that many voters ignored policy platforms.
Kamala Harris’s economic policy slate more popular than Trump’s – poll | US elections 2024 | The Guardian

It's not any more accurate. As you pointed out the plural of platform it's many things. I'm personally not going to vilify anyone for voting what they think best.

But there is a clear message in Harris not carrying a single of the 7 battle ground states.

 

[GO-NAD!]

I've yet to see any 'news' site that was whipping the horse for Harris show an


It's not any more accurate. As you pointed out the plural of platform it's many things. I'm personally not going to vilify anyone for voting what they think best.

But there is a clear message in Harris not carrying a single of the 7 battle ground states.

There is a message, but I'm not sure if it's very clear yet.

 

[jinjuku]

There is a message, but I'm not sure if it's very clear yet.

If the democratic party can't interpret not carrying any of the battleground states, not even Walz's Minnesota, the message is that they aren't listening/out of touch.

 

[highfigh]

So, are doctors becoming less competent? Or, is the increased legal jeopardy they face by giving proper care forcing them to compromise the care they give?
Pregnancy deaths rose by 56% in Texas after 2021 abortion ban, analysis finds

My treatment has been far less than satisfactory and from others with various ailments, their experiences are on par (or worse, ending in death) while others have had very different/much better outcomes.

As far as OB/GYN, I have no experience with that but if the DR in the case where the woman died, I have a few questions- Why was there a 12 hour gap between onset of problems and treatment? Why did the DR not do an ultrasound, at the least? Why did they not refer her to someone else, who might have wanted to provide adequate and proper care?

I have a gigantic problem with anyone in medicine who holds off proper treatment for ANY reason and if they do it because their religion prohibits it, I want them gone from medicine. Or government, education, etc. TX has a lot of hard core 'God will strike you down' followers who are absolutely unwilling to change their views and it's not limited to TX- the Bible Belt is a very bizarre place.

I don't know the limits in other states, but Wisconsin allows $750K in damages for medical malpractice, so if a DR does nothing, they need to keep their mouths shut if they made a bad diagnosis.

 

[Trell]

I have a gigantic problem with anyone in medicine who holds off proper treatment for ANY reason and if they do it because their religion prohibits it, I want them gone from medicine

It’s a consequence of Republican anti-abortion laws.

 

[GO-NAD!]

If the democratic party can't interpret not carrying any of the battleground states, not even Walz's Minnesota, the message is that they aren't listening/out of touch.

That certainly plays into it, but it's not the whole story. It has only been a week and the analysis will take more time. It's not just that voters turned to Trump. Many progressives and members of ethnic communities stayed home, because Harris' was perceived as too centrist and/or supportive of Israel.
A Look at Democratic Voter Turnout and Trump’s Election Victory - The New York Times

No question that the Democrats messaging needs work, but many GOP voters and Democrat non-voters have to take some ownership for what they've done. If they prefer to be infantilized and told what they want to hear - even if its BS - that's on them.

 

[GO-NAD!]

My treatment has been far less than satisfactory and from others with various ailments, their experiences are on par (or worse, ending in death) while others have had very different/much better outcomes.

As far as OB/GYN, I have no experience with that but if the DR in the case where the woman died, I have a few questions- Why was there a 12 hour gap between onset of problems and treatment? Why did the DR not do an ultrasound, at the least? Why did they not refer her to someone else, who might have wanted to provide adequate and proper care?

I have a gigantic problem with anyone in medicine who holds off proper treatment for ANY reason and if they do it because their religion prohibits it, I want them gone from medicine. Or government, education, etc. TX has a lot of hard core 'God will strike you down' followers who are absolutely unwilling to change their views and it's not limited to TX- the Bible Belt is a very bizarre place.

I don't know the limits in other states, but Wisconsin allows $750K in damages for medical malpractice, so if a DR does nothing, they need to keep their mouths shut if they made a bad diagnosis.

It's because they have greater fear of criminal prosecution by the State than being sued for malpractice.

 

[highfigh]

It's because they have greater fear of criminal prosecution by the State than being sued for malpractice.

And neither is good but I'm sure medical facilities have policies, too, all of which hinder treatment. Then, there's rejection of treatment by the insurance companies.

 

[mtrycrafts]

Well folks, stand by what's to come. A Fox News host, Pete Hegseth, is to run DOD.
No wonder he doesn't want senate approval just recess appointments.

 

[Trell]

Well folks, stand by what's to come. A Fox News host, Pete Hegseth, is to run DOD.
No wonder he doesn't want senate approval just recess appointments.

A Senate RFK Jr hearing would be more entertaining, though.

>>>Hegseth says he was removed from inauguration duty in 2021 because of what he described as a religious tattoo.<<<

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/12/politics/pete-hegseth-secretary-of-defense/index.html

 

[cpp]

Well folks, stand by what's to come. A Fox News host, Pete Hegseth, is to run DOD.
No wonder he doesn't want senate approval just recess appointments.

About as bad as "
Trump picks Kristi Noem to serve as his Homeland Security secretary "

 

[davidscott]

This has got to be the most inept and strangest cabinet that has ever been put together. But what would you expect from Trump? Heaven help our country. And he just added alleged pedophile Matt Gaetz. I'm just glad that I don't have any kids