
darien87
Audioholic Spartan
Yeah, I only hate the ones I don't start.I guess he's not opposed to them when their in his favor.![]()
Yeah, I only hate the ones I don't start.I guess he's not opposed to them when their in his favor.![]()
As opposed to paying him to not send more troops to Afghanistan or oppose Iran's nuclear ambitions? He was nominated less than two weeks into his presidency- he had done nothing to deserve this and it's only his prize because they hope it will bring good things. Everyone else has gotten theirs for what they did, not what they might do.http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/eu_nobel_peace
I'm surprised Buckeye Nut or one of the other Obama-haters hasn't commented on this yet. Personally I think it's a little early to be giving the man awards, but this seems to prove that he's definitley making strides towards improving the U.S.'s standing in the rest of the world.
Come on, ya know it's killin' ya!![]()
I have to second that, he should made some efforts to get it.It just proves to me that those awards don't really mean much. I think it was a little premature really. They should have at least waited until he actually did something to earn it.
Way to try to bait people into a flame war. This has nothing at all to do with the post, but hey, if you insist....but hey, if Al Gore can win one for lining his pockets by turning natural climate fluctuation into mass global warming hysteria, no one else will really surprises me.
Did he? Close it down then and delete it prontoAren't you the one who complained about political threads?![]()
I'm not baiting anyone, just showing past winners weren't very deserving either i.e. Al Gore, Jimmy Carter, yasser arafat. Lighten up francis.Way to try to bait people into a flame war. This has nothing at all to do with the post, but hey, if you insist.
Global warming is bigger than the normal climate fluctuation when you actually look at the studies. I only pray that people stop burying their heads in the sand and actually at least take a chance on trying to help the situation.
All I did was point out that the whole global warming thing has nothing to do with Obama or his winning, which is what this thread is about. There is nothing for me to lighten up about.I'm not baiting anyone, just showing past winners weren't very deserving either i.e. Al Gore, Jimmy Carter, yasser arafat. Lighten up francis.
You noticed your the only one that commented on it, right? It was an example of another lame duck winning the NPP.All I did was point out that the whole global warming thing has nothing to do with Obama or his winning, which is what this thread is about. There is nothing for me to lighten up about.
Nothing has proven Obama is a lame duck. That is nothing more than the opinion that some have. I thought Bush was a lame duck after his first term, but since he had a second one that means I was wrong.You noticed your the only one that commented on it, right? It was an example of another lame duck winning the NPP.
What has Obama done in the first two weeks of presidency to win the NPP? MLK Jr. worked for years to advance civil equalities of minorities before being awarded the NPP. It's a slap in the face to the ones that have actually done something to deserve it, not by just being a charismatic rock star.Nothing has proven Obama is a lame duck. That is nothing more than the opinion that some have. I thought Bush was a lame duck after his first term, but since he had a second one that means I was wrong.
Well, like I said, it's a farce and will continue to be so if they keep nominating people by "what they might do". Remember, Obama was only in office for 12 days before the February 1st nomination deadline.I didn't read anywhere that the committee had to restrict itself to the person's accomplishments at the date that their name was submitted... Off the top of my head I can't think of anyone, using their criteria, that has done more for "fraternity between nations" this year.
Unlike the other Nobel Prizes, which are awarded by Swedish institutions, the peace prize is given out by a five-member committee elected by the Norwegian Parliament. Like the Parliament, the committee has a leftist slant, with three members elected by left-of-center parties. Jagland said the decision to honor Obama was unanimous.
Obama's designation is akin to giving an Oscar to a young director for films we hope that he or she will produce or for a first-time published author getting a Pulitzer for a book he is destined to write some day.The Nobel committee chairman said after awarding the 2002 prize to former Democratic President Jimmy Carter, for his mediation in international conflicts, that it should be seen as a "kick in the leg" to the Bush administration's hard line in the buildup to the Iraq war.
The reason he started this thread was not because it somehow supported his belief, and it only slightly contradicts his hate for political threads. My educated postulation of why he started the thread is right in the context. He was surprised no one else had mentioned it yet and wanted to be the herald of the news. It's an exciting feeling for someone to deliver news, especially when they usually aren't the first one to the punch. It's called "me first" syndrome, meaning he knew about it soon enough to make an announcement to everyone else. He's proud of making the statement.http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/eu_nobel_peace
I'm surprised Buckeye Nut or one of the other Obama-haters hasn't commented on this yet. Personally I think it's a little early to be giving the man awards, but this seems to prove that he's definitley making strides towards improving the U.S.'s standing in the rest of the world.
Come on, ya know it's killin' ya!![]()
Off the top of my head?In fairness Bush was fairly succesful except in Iraq which spilled over into everything else. He made a big mistake in how he handled Iraq, but what else did he do that was so bad? Obama has a few years to mess up like that too
I don't agree with the bailouts as they were done. I do recognize that Obama was an advocate of them.Obama followed the same economic policies as Bush in trying to bring the economy back too. Don't get me wrong they are very different people with very different goals. Still not being someone else is not a goal or accomplishment. Bringing Iran to no longer pursue nuclear weapons would be an achievement.
Make your case.They decided that "the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations" is Barack Obama. I think a case can be made for that...
If you want an example of baiting people into a flame war; I suggest you reread post #1Way to try to bait people into a flame war.
I'm surprised Buckeye Nut or one of the other Obama-haters hasn't commented on this yet.
Come on, ya know it's killin' ya!
Can something be "worked towards" even when not complete or accomplished?Make your case.![]()