Obama=Change
Change=Outright Socialism with a Marxist agenda
Everyone wanted change (voting for Obama) but failed to question or ask what that change was. The election for most was anything but republican. The problem is that there really is only one party now. The political elite.
Someone explain how spending 1.487 trillion dollars on failing companies and failing government & policies makes a situation better?
Want an economic boost? Offer 787 billion in tax cuts and downsize the government instead of making it bigger so that future generations have an even larger tax burden??? That would get people spending in a hurry. It would bail out banks because mortgages & debt get paid off. Then tighten credit standards if need be so that only the responsible can use credit.
NONE of this makes any sense unless a group of people (i.e. a political class) is trying to tighten a power grasp.
Wait a second though? That is all common sense I forgot, that is dead in this country and has been for some time.
I cannot believe most people do not understand what is being done here?? This is not about republican or democrat, this is democracy vs. socialism/communism/marxism. No one seems to get it? In fact due to media based brainwashing, people seem to want it because they are believing propaganda. 1984 is alive in well in the USA.
Here is an example of "newspeak": Stimulus plan= Stimulates the government & makes it larger.
I for one will not stand by and let it happen. I will educate my fellow man for opening one's eyes is the first step in waking up.
End rant!!!
Maybe...
...and this is why I voted for Annunaki for President!
(I still think you should run for office, Rob.)
This "Stimulus" bill is the world's largest Ponzi scheme...ever. That's all it is. "Hey, we've spent so much, we're in trouble. Let's spend a whole lot more to get out of this trouble."
But I know...logical details must be damned. (Logic? What's logic? "I want that money in MY hands" cry the masses...which include politicians, by the way.) Like congress, our school systems have, after all, fallen into the hands of incompetency, so these days wisdom is something we should regard with surprise.
I'll say this for the Nth time...the Republicans have their hands in your right pocket, the Democrats have theirs in your left. They're getting it either way, so scr3w you, Mr. Taxpayer. George Will is an extremely smart man. He has clarified (and agreed with) Obama's current media-blitz message..."My fear is that there is insufficient fear [concerning the global economy, by the populace]!" (But, like Obama, Will buys too far into the two party system as a means for useful governance checks and balances). He believes that the liberal/conservative changing landscape will of its own accord take care of these excesses...or inexcesses, depending upon your point of view.
I regret to post my contrary prediction that nothing but large scale civil disobedience and or violence will be the only result of the current, world-wide political and economic mess. Be it poverty induced riots and consequent reaction in the large, minority based cities such as Los Angeles, or a border intrusion by one country into another (heaven forbid either are nuclear armed)...historically local or international bad economic times have
always resulted in protracted local or international violence and/or warfare. (Any history students out there?)
I'll go beyond the usual criticizing or sarcasm in these threads and offer a positive suggestion. It only takes one, small catalyzing act. Anyone remember a certain tax on TEA?! Talk about history changer.
During the
First Revolution
cool
, also during the
First Depression
cool
there were a couple of investments or acquisitions that helped people pull through and even allowed some to thrive...storage of food, alcohol, entertainment, tools, firearms, and personal determination. The forewarned is forearmed.
Per Annunaki...end of rant. Maybe!
[Edited for clarity]
