Minneapolis Annunciation School Mass Shooting

[highfigh]

Really? While the genderwoo is thankfully entering Emperors New Clothes territory, you bet your ass it's been normalized.

The kids own mother was reluctant to affirm his trans identity, but did so under threats of being labeled a bigot or transphobe from literally everyone around her. This lunacy has indeed been normalized, to the detriment of a generation of kids whose comorbidities are ignored thanks to the rush to affirmation.

It's a grave mistake to affirm delusions. We don't have discussions with the imaginary friends of schizophrenics or tell anorexics that they're overweight and need ozempic and gastric banding. But if a kid claims a trans identity they are unquestioningly affirmed and told a victimhood narrative of being genocided. It's a pretty direct line from "Protect the Dolls" to "Arm the Dolls" to a doll shooting their percieved enemies as happened here (and elsewhere lately). This situation is the hard left analog to Timothy McVeigh. Get steeped in crazy, do crazy poop.

As they are deadly tools, we should keep guns out of the hands of crazy people.

I thought you meant it was normalized on a large scale, not by his mommy, and a lot of mommies think their little angels can do no wrong- this is either true in her case, or she was performing some kind of sick experiment. AFAIK, they still haven't found her and they need to, ASAP.

 

[highfigh]

I can only assume that you are referring to liberals in the American context. Pretty much everywhere else in the world, liberals hug the centre of the political/social spectrum - leaning left or right, or straddling the fence. Far from viewing issues in binary terms, they (I would describe myself as a fence straddler) are often accused of hypocrisy precisely because they see the world in infinite shades of grey.

That's not to say liberals don't believe in hard facts. It's just that hard facts and objective truth is - for the most part, at least - confined to the hard sciences. Ironically, this is where the script gets flipped by the avowed left- and right- wingers. They are the ones who tend to question objective truth and scientific facts, while forming hidebound opinions on political and social issues.


I'm sure you will agree that this highly unlikely in the foreseeable future.

An AV sales rep studied Political Science and at times, it seems that he can't be consistent in his views, but when he has debated 'things' with a friend of mine, friend usually disagrees and when AV rep doesn't seem to understand how anyone could see a different view, friend asks 'But what if everything you were taught is wrong?". AV rep has no comeback for that.

I would REALLY like to see more level-headed discussion about this- far too many go off the edge into yelling, name-calling and complete inability to even consider the other points being made. When it becomes "Yes it is" vs "No it isn't", progress is generally impossible.

The saying "The first step in solving a problem is in defining it" is true, but there's no agreement in the definition. Access is too easy, too many who aren't legally allowed are getting their hands on guns far too easily and that brings another group to blame- they're committing a crime just by lending or selling guns to felons and people with mental illness, but trying to get some people to change their ways is just yelling at a wall- it does nothing.

Felons who have already been convicted of violent crimes are getting guns and reoffending- why are so many being let go after time served and short incarceration? They don't see it as punishment but it's time to make them feel the pain, good and hard. It's an insult to the victims, it's killing people and politicians talk about having a plan, but the plans don't work. Chicago doesn't want help and they have said they have it handled, but 58 shot/8 dead last weekend doesn't show any proof of that.

 

[GO-NAD!]

An AV sales rep studied Political Science and at times, it seems that he can't be consistent in his views, but when he has debated 'things' with a friend of mine, friend usually disagrees and when AV rep doesn't seem to understand how anyone could see a different view, friend asks 'But what if everything you were taught is wrong?". AV rep has no comeback for that.

I would REALLY like to see more level-headed discussion about this- far too many go off the edge into yelling, name-calling and complete inability to even consider the other points being made. When it becomes "Yes it is" vs "No it isn't", progress is generally impossible.

The saying "The first step in solving a problem is in defining it" is true, but there's no agreement in the definition. Access is too easy, too many who aren't legally allowed are getting their hands on guns far too easily and that brings another group to blame- they're committing a crime just by lending or selling guns to felons and people with mental illness, but trying to get some people to change their ways is just yelling at a wall- it does nothing.

Felons who have already been convicted of violent crimes are getting guns and reoffending- why are so many being let go after time served and short incarceration? They don't see it as punishment but it's time to make them feel the pain, good and hard. It's an insult to the victims, it's killing people and politicians talk about having a plan, but the plans don't work. Chicago doesn't want help and they have said they have it handled, but 58 shot/8 dead last weekend doesn't show any proof of that.

" Access is too easy, too many who aren't legally allowed are getting their hands on guns far too easily", because there are just so many firearms available.

While Chicago may have a high rate of gun crime, it has been dropping.

Redirect Notice

There are also cities with higher crime rates than Chicago, but the POTUS doesn't seem to be as concerned about those.

 

[ski2xblack]

I thought you meant it was normalized on a large scale, not by his mommy, and a lot of mommies think their little angels can do no wrong- this is either true in her case, or she was performing some kind of sick experiment.

Yes, normalized on a large scale. The experiment being conducted is society wide. The victims are children (and women, and the LGB, whose rights are predicated on the material reality of sex). The proximal victims are those murdered in cold blood at Annunciation Church.

It's a top-down imposition of a secularized gnostic gender/body dualism cult under a veneer of junk science and rights language.

The killer in this case was steeped in it (as well as other lunacy). His mother was coerced by it (apparently the father was the primary enabler while she was reluctant). The media is still walking on eggshells about "misgendering" this deranged killer. NPR reprimanded Amy Klobushar for referring to him as "him" rather than "her."

Still think it's just the mommy? Pay attention.

 

[highfigh]

" Access is too easy, too many who aren't legally allowed are getting their hands on guns far too easily", because there are just so many firearms available.

While Chicago may have a high rate of gun crime, it has been dropping.

Redirect Notice

There are also cities with higher crime rates than Chicago, but the POTUS doesn't seem to be as concerned about those.

Oh, good- a PBS link.

You sound like the effing Mayor of Chicago and Gov Pritstick with your "It's not as bad as it was"- MKE has seen reduced homicides too, but so far, this year has seen 79. While it's down from a few years ago, IT'S STILL TOO GD MANY!

Here's some info for ya- WRT "dropping", how can anyone say it's acceptable, in any way? Dropping from a ridiculous number to a slightly less ridiculous number when lives are concerned doesn't mean it's OK and coming from someone whose area probably sees more cows hit by cars & trucks than homicides, I think you're missing the message.

2024 homicide rankings: Chicago, St. Louis lead nation yet again – A Wirepoints survey of America’s 75 largest cities | Wirepoints

Chicago was once again the nation’s homicide capital in 2024 with 573 murders – the 13th year in a row that the Windy City has suffered more murders than anywhere else in the country. St. Louis was the nation’s other murder capital when based on homicides per capita, marking the third year in a...

wirepoints.org

Would people in your area consider any of this 'acceptable'? I sincerely hope not.

 

[GO-NAD!]

Oh, good- a PBS link.

You sound like the effing Mayor of Chicago and Gov Pritstick with your "It's not as bad as it was"- MKE has seen reduced homicides too, but so far, this year has seen 79. While it's down from a few years ago, IT'S STILL TOO GD MANY!

Here's some info for ya- WRT "dropping", how can anyone say it's acceptable, in any way? Dropping from a ridiculous number to a slightly less ridiculous number when lives are concerned doesn't mean it's OK and coming from someone whose area probably sees more cows hit by cars & trucks than homicides, I think you're missing the message.

2024 homicide rankings: Chicago, St. Louis lead nation yet again – A Wirepoints survey of America’s 75 largest cities | Wirepoints

Chicago was once again the nation’s homicide capital in 2024 with 573 murders – the 13th year in a row that the Windy City has suffered more murders than anywhere else in the country. St. Louis was the nation’s other murder capital when based on homicides per capita, marking the third year in a...

wirepoints.org

Would people in your area consider any of this 'acceptable'? I sincerely hope not.

Did I say the numbers were OK? No, I did not. How did you jump to that conclusion? Of course there are too many homicides! But, if there is any justification for sending in the NG to patrol a city because of its high crime rates, there are several that should be prioritized over Chicago.

Which cities have the highest murder rates? | USAFacts

Memphis, St. Louis, Baltimore, Washington, DC, and Birmingham have the highest murder rates of all major US cities.

usafacts.org

If you want to respond to a post that refers to the rate of of incidents with a post referring to numbers of incidents, that's up to you. But, be clear that you're talking about apples and not oranges.