@GO-NAD! I think we might agree that both parties are nuts. As a GDI, I don't discriminate based on sectarian tribalism. They're equally worthless.
There are nutters in every political party. But, the GOP seems to have cornered the market in that regard.
GDI? Are you a Gasoline Direct Injection engine, or a Gender Development Index? Help me out here.
I don't think that you and highfigh know what to make of a liberal critique of GI. You both seem to want to frame any criticism of it as right wing.
I know you use a liberal amount of jargon in your critique. I realize that there are critics on the left - some LGB and women's rights groups, certainly. But, the vast majority of criticism is definitely emminates from the right.
Just to be clear, I'm not onside with everything that comes from gender activists' mouths. For instance, I am not supportive of male bodies of any gender identity in women's prisons. I also think the suggestion of dozens upon dozens of genders is a load of bollocks. And, subordinating women's and LGB rights to the rights of the gender diverse is wrong.
Generally speaking, I find that the loudest voices on any particular controversial issue are the most partisan and often the ones with the least credibility. And, when I read and hear very hardset opinions on an issue that is far from settled science, I view them with a healthy dose of skepticism.
I must also reiterate, if there are demographic groups in society who need to be disarmed, transgender people should be wayyyy down the list of priorities.