MAXIMIZING THE USEFULNESS OF A HOME THEATER WITH 2 CENTER CHANNEL SPEAKERS

[William Lemmerhirt]

Not a whopper, I'm sure people will read the OP and understand my point; then be able to discard the irrelevant postings within the thread.

So that's it?

 

[Pogre]

I think the thing is, read what people are posting as to WHY your theory doesn't hold a glass of water instead of just assuming you're right. We all learn, I have posted some whoppers.

That's the point I was trying to make earlier. OP wants us to buy into this, but doesn't want to do any research or check facts on the things we're pointing out. I think OP stands to learn a lot about audio and could get an education here if he chooses.

 

[Pogre]

Not a whopper, I'm sure people will read the OP and understand my point; then be able to discard the irrelevant postings within the thread.

When I read the title of this thread I thought "why is he using all caps?". I almost didn't even click on it.

If you expect people to discard irrelevant posts, then your first one can be discarded entirely.

 

[DCS0760]

Maybe, as I mentioned earlier; don't want to get stuck in the mud and watch wheels spin.

Maybe it's the wrong forum, maybe I walked into/posted in a ghetto

 

[William Lemmerhirt]

Maybe, as I mentioned earlier; don't want to get stuck in the mud and watch wheels spin.

Maybe it's the wrong forum, maybe I walked into/posted in a ghetto

Ghetto is the crap you posted that started the whole thing. That's great. Call us ghetto when you won't even explain anything except "refer to the op". Super credible.

 

[Pogre]

Maybe, as I mentioned earlier; don't want to get stuck in the mud and watch wheels spin.

Maybe it's the wrong forum, maybe I walked into/posted in a ghetto

You walked into a place that understands and knows what you're proposing is pretty ridiculous. Your post wasn't that well received at AVS either.

It's one thing when someone tells you you're wrong. It's a whole different bag when you have many people who are very educated on a subject tell you you're wrong. You need to find a forum with more gullible people in it. Then you'll get the replies you want. You still have failed to state the value in this configuration, or offer any type of scientific evidence or measurements supporting your claim.

 

[Pogre]

Ghetto is the crap you posted that started the whole thing. That's great. Call us ghetto when you won't even explain anything except "refer to the op". Super credible.

I blame you and 'Head. He would have never thought we were ghetto if 'Head didn't start talking about putting cheese in his coffee and you in your beer.

So ghetto. I swear, you guys are embarrasing.

 

[William Lemmerhirt]

I blame you and 'Head. He would have never thought we were ghetto if 'Head didn't start talking about putting cheese in his coffee and you in your beer.

So ghetto. I swear, you guys are embarrasing.

Rofl! Can't take us anywhere huh? I'll take that I guess.
I'll admit I may have taken a couple small shots at op, but I know I civilly asked a couple times for more clarification. Got a link to his avs thread?

 

[Klipschhead302]

Not a whopper, I'm sure people will read the OP and understand my point; then be able to discard the irrelevant postings within the thread.

Have you found a response to indicate that people have read the OP and understand your point??

 

[Klipschhead302]

I blame you and 'Head. He would have never thought we were ghetto if 'Head didn't start talking about putting cheese in his coffee and you in your beer.

So ghetto. I swear, you guys are embarrasing.

Guilty as charged, hey I needed a comparison.... I had my morning errrr or was that late morning third coffee what the hell am I talking about?? I need more coffee dammit!


...

 

[Pogre]

Rofl! Can't take us anywhere huh? I'll take that I guess.
I'll admit I may have taken a couple small shots at op, but I know I civilly asked a couple times for more clarification. Got a link to his avs thread?

All in fun Bill! I like to have fun. It's my way.

I think it would be awesome if OP saw the light and actually checked into some of the issues we're pointing out that this configuration will cause and learns something. Some evidence to support his claims would certainly help.

Here's the thread. Hardly any replies. Just a couple replies similar to what he got here.

 

[Klipschhead302]

Rofl! Can't take us anywhere huh? I'll take that I guess.
I'll admit I may have taken a couple small shots at op, but I know I civilly asked a couple times for more clarification. Got a link to his avs thread?

Agreed, small shots aside I think people have tried to reason with him, now I just want a beer, no cheese.


.

 

[Pogre]

Guilty as charged, hey I needed a comparison.... I had my morning errrr or was that late morning third coffee what the hell am I talking about?? I need more coffee dammit!


...

I'll bet you'd be pretty entertaining to have some beers with.

 

[Klipschhead302]

I'll bet you'd be pretty entertaining to have some beers with.

Well, back in 1987 I won a beer drinking contest by downing 5 pitchers of beer (nope, not kidding) faster than anybody involved or so I was told when I woke up. I'm told I was a blast to hang out with that night!

 

[rojo]

Not a whopper, I'm sure people will read the OP and understand my point; then be able to discard the irrelevant postings within the thread.

Your confidence is misplaced. Not a single man jack among us can see a single benefit to having two center channels. It's an added expense, an added complication, and for some reason you continue to ignore the arguments that rather inconveniently prove you wrong. For example, http://forums.audioholics.com/forums/threads/maximizing-the-usefulness-of-a-home-theater-with-2-center-channel-speakers.107371/page-2#post-1186395

Randomly putting words in all caps and enclosing them in quotation marks provides no additional illumination to those of us struggling to understand how your proposal is anything other than bat shit crazy. If your advice were standing next to Charles Manson, the Joker, and 2007 Britney Spears, it is to your post and your post alone that people would point and say, "That is nuts!", dismissing the other three as inconsequential trivialities. You. Are. Not. Right. You are not entitled to your opinion when your opinion contradicts mathematically proven conventions.

The only sensible assessment you have offered thusfar is that you might be posting on the wrong forum.

 

[Klipschhead302]

Quote rojo - "You are not entitled to your opinion when your opinion contradicts mathematically proven conventions."

Everybody is entitled to their opinion but then everybody else is entitled to explain how wrong they are. I hope we never get to a point where somebody isn't allowed to be bat chit crazy wrong, some people can't help themselves.

 

[Pogre]

Yeah, like 'Head.

 

[William Lemmerhirt]

It's all good to me. If you didn't zing me I'd think you didn't carelol!
Not likely he's open to any advice.

 

[Klipschhead302]

It's all good to me. If you didn't zing me I'd think you didn't carelol!
Not likely he's open to any advice.

 

[William Lemmerhirt]

View attachment 20884

Lol!!!
I too am ready for a beer now.