Least worst option for connecting existing speakers wireless for rear surround

[Linwood]

Might want to review this article https://www.audioholics.com/loudspeaker-design/center-channel-designs-1

Ah... looks very on point, let me study a bit. THanks.

I still prefer a center even though most of the time I'm on my own. What are you doing for sub?

Sub is a Klipsch SW-350. Not great, but it has plenty of volume in that room (for my old ears that don't expect the walls to shake).

If that's the second question you're referring to, I'd rather have to food mains and a sub vs 3 upfront channels to start with.

I didn't intend to imply I lacked a sub. Unless what I have doesn't really count.

But I'm unclear why that needs to be a choice. I was going to get a center regardless. It's not "2 good speakers" or "3 poor speakers". It is more "3 speakers costing $2850 vs 3 speakers costing $1949 can I really tell the difference in that awful room and my old ears'. I know that's hard to answer when you don't know me and can't sit in the room (though @TLS Guy is pretty emphatic on the "yes").

I don't really have a budget in mind - despite asking about $2000. This is more about not wanting to pay for quality beyond the point that I can actually tell the difference, complicated by a poor room and wiring challenges. Which of course makes this very hard to answer. But I suspect you all have friends who are far, far from being Audiophiles.

It's kind of like wine. I have a several friends who are wine snobs in the extreme. And I like wine. But I'm happy with a lot of $10 wines, and find anything over about $30 is just wasted on me -- I may like the $100 bottle of wine they pull out, but not any better than a good $30 bottle, and maybe even a $12 one. Don't misunderstand, there are a LOT of bad wines under $30. And probably fewer bad wines at $100. But to me a good $30 and a good $100 bottle are not that different. I know this from decades of dining, business dinners, friends wine choices, etc. But I also know some people REALLY know the difference (a good friend is a certified sommelier), I believe it, like I believe others can really hear a significant difference in high end gear. But that won't be me in either case.

I just don't want to pay $100 for the bottle of wine speaker equivalent if I'll be happy at $30. But I do want to be happy.

 

[lovinthehd]

Ah... looks very on point, let me study a bit. THanks.



Sub is a Klipsch SW-350. Not great, but it has plenty of volume in that room (for my old ears that don't expect the walls to shake).



I didn't intend to imply I lacked a sub. Unless what I have doesn't really count.

But I'm unclear why that needs to be a choice. I was going to get a center regardless. It's not "2 good speakers" or "3 poor speakers". It is more "3 speakers costing $2850 vs 3 speakers costing $1949 can I really tell the difference in that awful room and my old ears'. I know that's hard to answer when you don't know me and can't sit in the room (though @TLS Guy is pretty emphatic on the "yes").

I don't really have a budget in mind - despite asking about $2000. This is more about not wanting to pay for quality beyond the point that I can actually tell the difference, complicated by a poor room and wiring challenges. Which of course makes this very hard to answer. But I suspect you all have friends who are far, far from being Audiophiles.

It's kind of like wine. I have a several friends who are wine snobs in the extreme. And I like wine. But I'm happy with a lot of $10 wines, and find anything over about $30 is just wasted on me -- I may like the $100 bottle of wine they pull out, but not any better than a good $30 bottle, and maybe even a $12 one. Don't misunderstand, there are a LOT of bad wines under $30. And probably fewer bad wines at $100. But to me a good $30 and a good $100 bottle are not that different. I know this from decades of dining, business dinners, friends wine choices, etc. But I also know some people REALLY know the difference (a good friend is a certified sommelier), I believe it, like I believe others can really hear a significant difference in high end gear. But that won't be me in either case.

I just don't want to pay $100 for the bottle of wine speaker equivalent if I'll be happy at $30. But I do want to be happy.

Ah, but it is very hard to predict/judge the $ to your preference in speaker sound for anyone but you. There are some very well priced speakers people prefer to much more expensive speakers. Some speakers are grossly overpriced too. Stick to measurements/performance is my recommendation. Get the best bang for the buck for sure....what I found good (no longer available) might not be something you like.....

The Klipsch SW350 is okay, but there are better subs and I generally want multiple of the same sub for best results, especially for multiple seats. I saw your comment after the $2000 budget was questioned and it generally I'd say a couple hundred bucks isn't a great big deal, depends on deals/speakers/room/amp needs to accommodate, etc. I'm basically a thrifty audio guy fwiw.

 

[ski2xblack]

Don't give much credence to Crutchfield ratings.

Best, most reliable way to evaluate are technical reviews that @shadyJ does here, or Klippel nfs reviews as done by Erin (Erins audio corner) and Amir (at ASR). They won't tell you if you'll like em, but will tell you what to rule out.

Before you splurge on something, consider your use. Unless you want to disturb the neighbors, maybe you don't need something as over the top as the Arendals (you should still enter the drawing, though, those would rock your world). If more sane listening levels will be the norm in your house, that opens the options for otherwise great speakers that have less dynamic range, e.g. the KEF R3 Meta I mentioned. There are quite a few options in that direction, some of which might leave room in the budget for a sub (thinking of the Ascilab speakers, which sport textbook perfect measurements, I mean perfect, their only limits are that they're not high spl bangers...f6b are less than $900/pair, f6b s only $725...high passed-to ameliorate their limits- and paired with a pair of RSL 10s subs for $500 each, voila, a seriously great two channel rig).

 

[Kingnoob]

Don't give much credence to Crutchfield ratings.

Best, most reliable way to evaluate are technical reviews that @shadyJ does here, or Klippel nfs reviews as done by Erin (Erins audio corner) and Amir (at ASR). They won't tell you if you'll like em, but will tell you what to rule out.

Before you splurge on something, consider your use. Unless you want to disturb the neighbors, maybe you don't need something as over the top as the Arendals (you should still enter the drawing, though, those would rock your world). If more sane listening levels will be the norm in your house, that opens the options for otherwise great speakers that have less dynamic range, e.g. the KEF R3 Meta I mentioned. There are quite a few options in that direction, some of which might leave room in the budget for a sub (thinking of the Ascilab speakers, which sport textbook perfect measurements, I mean perfect, their only limits are that they're not high spl bangers...f6b are less than $900/pair, f6b s only $725...high passed-to ameliorate their limits- and paired with a pair of RSL 10s subs for $500 each, voila, a seriously great two channel rig).

Is it true the uni q drivers can blow if you go to reference level too long or is that a myth ? Maybe this is wrong or untrue ? There centers look interesting if mine isn’t enough if I ever use it again. Running phantom now with Klipsch .

 

[ski2xblack]

Any driver will blow if you abuse it.

That's why knowing what your use case is, how loud you want it, the listening distances involved, will help you narrow down the choices to products that will meet or exceed your requirements, so you won't blow anything up.