Health care...Yeah or Nay

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rickster71

Rickster71

Audioholic Spartan
I guess you missed the etc...
Oh, do tell what you meant by etc?

With me being a Libertarian, your posts only seem to mention Republicans. I see very little 'real' difference between the two parties.

If you think Republican scare tactics are the only problem about funding TARP, and Health Care, you don't know the details, or politics.

This thread was going along nicely, with mostly real honest conversation and opinions.... until you started the partisan crap.
 
annunaki

annunaki

Moderator
Here is the way I look at it.

Look into lowering costs rather than just having insurance.

Most insurance does not pay for squat anyway so what good is it to pay $500 a month for something that is rarely used. Then when it is, one still has to pay even more for what insurance should cover.

I would fully support health savings accounts accompanied by catastrophic care based coverage. The catastrophic coverage would be good for finding out one has cancer or a major automobile accident, etc. The health savings account would be an interest earning account that is good for regular doctor's visits, etc.

The only legislation passed would be to help control costs.
Examples: controlling fraud, encouraging hospitals to compete against one another for doctor's visits and other routine procedures, etc.


Why should someone be MADE to pay for something they don't want or be fined? There is no product or service out there like that. Sure I have to pay car insurance, but I choose to drive, I also get the privilege of driving where ever I want to go. If I choose not to drive and not have insurance, I am not fined for it.

Who is the government to decide whether or not I can "afford" something either. Is that not up to me? The last time I checked it was supposed to me my choice.



:confused:

to a pretty big degree, IMO. I mean, that's how all insurance works. I've never caused a car accident in my life, I haven't broke the deductible on my healthcare in a decade, Dont have any kids, not likely to die anytime in the near future. Yet I pay thousands a year for all that insurance so that people can drive like idiots, go to the doctor constantly, and cr@p out kids like their life depended on it.

Sure, you don't pay for the uninsured fatty to get regular (cheap?) checkups, but you ARE already paying for him to go to the ER when he actually has a heart attack. Which maybe could have been prevented with regular care and medication? Some certainly would be, but I haven't seen any statistics on how much emergency medicine is likely to be prevented by more preventative care.

There's also another thing to consider. I can't remember the number, but I've seen it reported in the news that millions of the uninsured can afford it, they just choose not to. Common sense says that if you can afford insurance and forego it, you're probably pretty healthy. If those people are required to get insurance that is an aspect that will actually reduce insurance premiums (not to say that it's enough to cause a net reduction).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top