
mtrycrafts
Seriously, I have no life.
Well, his days are numbered..Thank you Ted Kennedy ....
Well, his days are numbered..Thank you Ted Kennedy ....
How is that counted? Do you have the hard numbers?... In the last Presidential election, ONLY 17% nationwide voted.
Cheers,
Phil
That is a beautiful looking square. The architecture is really something else. I just wouldn't want to deal with the cold, especially after being in southern Arizona for over a decade.Maybe you might want to consider relocating.
...and what problems lie beneath? I'm going to start a steam vent thread on home woes just for the fun of it and we'll really get to the bottom of this. Looks can be deceiving.That is a beautiful looking square. The architecture is really something else.
I still like the buildings, my friend. Sure, Russia has its problems, just like everywhere else. Plus, where else can you buy a ride in a fighter jet for $10K?...and what problems lie beneath?
Reminds me of when my dad made a comment about a girl being a real double-bagger. Hard to imagine my shock unless you'd lived for 15 years in a remarkably repressed household prior to that statement. Hilarious, indeed, but took me by suprise.Like my friend used to say when we were kids: 'She's a butter face'. 'Everything's good but her face'.
Ahhhh, just saw the thread that you started. Now I get it......and what problems lie beneath? I'm going to start a steam vent thread on home woes just for the fun of it and we'll really get to the bottom of this. Looks can be deceiving.![]()
http://genxfinance.com/2007/11/26/a-visual-history-of-the-stock-market-from-1996-2007/Can you give us some number? Say when buddy Bill took office, when the King took office and where it is today?
How about that unemployment rate? Highest since Ronni was in office in 1986
And, when the King backed off regulating and monitoring business, what do you expect but greed?
Oh, there was a big outcry here locally about my state only having about 14% voter turnout. There was also a lot of discussion about there only being about 17% nationally. So, that is how I understood it. Even at 40%, that is still pathetic in my book. Good Lord, people have died just to see that we had a right to vote. Blood has been shed, tears have fallen, and families destroyed yet only 40% vote.How is that counted? Do you have the hard numbers?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2004
They do. 122+ million total cast ballots.
We had 300 million total population in the last census. Take away all those not eligible and I just don't see that 17% no way, no how![]()
I do see 40+% with every person counted, including non eligible ones.
I think voting rights should be based under certain criteria, such as how they where conceived.Perhaps people feel it makes no difference in their lives these days. I for one always vote, but I also believe the right to vote shouldn't be granted at birth.
This is not how I remember it, but I admit I could be wrong. However, either way it still is pathetic even at 61%. At the very least, it should be no lower than 85% or so. Of course, this is MY point of view as others may feel differently. Personally, I think of the sacrifices people have made just to ensure I have a right to vote. It is NOT only a priviledge, but my duty to do so.About 17% of the nation's population voted for George Bush.
Voter turnout was almost 61% of registered voters.
About 40% of the nation's population voted.
Well, you areThis is not how I remember it, but I admit I could be wrong.
Wikipedia sited!How is that counted? Do you have the hard numbers?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2004
Bush got about 62 million. That would be over 20% of the overall population.About 17% of the nation's population voted for George Bush.
Voter turnout was almost 61% of registered voters.
About 40% of the nation's population voted.
Yes. Certainly has some impressive references for the data, like the Federal GovernmentWikipedia sited!
My wife teaches college and she has to remind her students before every paper not to site wikipedia due to all the errors.
collateral misinformation: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?defid=2903349&term=collateral+misinformation
/not taking sides, except against wikipedia![]()
Perhaps you missed the source of the numbers in Wikipedia:Wikipedia sited!
My wife teaches college and she has to remind her students before every paper not to site wikipedia due to all the errors.
collateral misinformation: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?defid=2903349&term=collateral+misinformation
/not taking sides, except against wikipedia![]()
Thanks.
But, is it a peer reviewed publicationPerhaps you missed the source of the numbers in Wikipedia:
The Federal Elections Commission Electoral and Popular Vote Summary.