
Alex2507
Audioholic Slumlord
Unable to ignore but this was in the link:
ShadyJ's rep was all red until I fixed it not long ago IIRC. I'm going to put it back the way it was. It seems like argument is of higher priority than understanding for him and the row of reds served as warning of that.
My understanding of this is far from complete but the article tells me that the output of a decent sub is perfectly capable of damaging human hearing.Nixon (Nixon, 1973) used a piston-phone
coupled to the subject’s ear via an earmuff to produce levels of 135dB at 18Hz.
Six five minute exposures were used with one to two minute rest periods
between. TTS was observed in one third of the subjects used, but this
recovered after about half an hour. Later work (Burdick et al., 1978) indicated
that there may be some permanent threshold shift (PTS) for long term high
level exposure.
In one experiment, chinchilla were exposed for three days to
octave band noise at, 100dB, 110dB and 120dB centred on 63Hz. The highest
level led to PTS of up to 40dB at 2kHz in the chinchilla. When human subjects
were exposed to the same low frequency noise at 110dB and 120dB for four
hours, a TTS of about 15dB resulted, extending from low frequencies up to
2kHz. The frequency used by Burdick et al is higher than in the other
experiments and might be expected to have a greater effect. There is an
indication that long-term exposure to very high levels may cause permanent
hearing loss.
ShadyJ's rep was all red until I fixed it not long ago IIRC. I'm going to put it back the way it was. It seems like argument is of higher priority than understanding for him and the row of reds served as warning of that.