But that's not how it's been working on my 2800 -- when I watch discs with 2.0 signals, ONLY the name of the upmixer stays on ("Dolby Surr" or "DTS Neural:X"), and when I watch discs with MULTICHANNEL content, the name of the base incoming codec AND upmixer (which is not being used in this instance) is shown ("DD + DSurr" or "DTS + Neural:X").
Ok, I mistyped. I get the same.
When I watched Exorcist III the other night, I tried running the DTS-HD MA 2.0 track, and the Denon refused to show just "DTS Neural:X," which it should have -- it showed "DTHD + Neural:X." My engineer contact at Denon is saying that it's possible this showed this way based on how the track was put into a container by the studio, but that's just weird to me.
.
I don't have any tracks in just DTS-HD 2.0. All 2.0 tracks are in DD.
Right -- but that doesn't explain why they're on for 5.1 content on a 5.1 SYSTEM. They shouldn't be. The only reason they should be illuminated or engaged on such a setup (like mine) is for when 2.0 signals need to be "matrixed" properly (I won't call it being "upmixed" in this case).
With my AVR-2312ci and Dolby Multichannel plus DPL IIx, it will only decode with DPL IIx with a 5.1 input signal so it's simple to turn back surround speakers on and off as needed.
With the new Dolby and DTS upmixers, there are so many combination of input signals and output speaker combinations that the upmixers work with, it was probably easiest and designed to just display and use the upmixer whether it's active or not.
My Denon contact said the upmixer does little with a 5.1 signal input and 5.1 speaker output, looking for a surround parameter to use (the virtualizer). We mainly discussed Dolby.
You could have any of these input signals, 3.0/3.1, 4.0/4.1, 5.0/5.1 or 7.0/7.1 upmixed to any of the speaker output configurations, 4.0/4.1, 5.0/5.1, 7.0/7.1, 5.1.2.
Lots and lots of variables compared to the only one, 5.1 input signal that was upmixed (decoded) to the one 7.1 speaker configuration with the Dolby Prologic IIx decoder.
It at least makes a lot more sense to me after having these discussions.
I did just disengage the Dolby Virtualizer as I didn't care for the over exaggerated rear soundfield that it created over the discrete rear soundfield.