
Alex2507
Audioholic Slumlord
I was gonna say, "time for a new g/f" ...Maybe not something to joke about
It's only funny about 98% of the time.
I was gonna say, "time for a new g/f" ...Maybe not something to joke about
According to Reuters, there is a supply shortage of the "low dead space" syringes that are used to get 6 doses from 5 dose vials. It's amazing to me (in a bad way) that we have the know-how to produce sophisticated vaccines but we are dropping the ball on relatively simple things like syringes.There is a quite lot of work to do before 80-90% of people in the US are vaccinated. So far, the supply of vaccine is far less than needed. With vaccines from two more manufacturers, J&J and AstraZeneca, soon to be approved, I hope to see increasing amounts of vaccine in the near future. The problem is that a public immunization apparatus (for lack of a better word) doesn't exist. And that's in Maryland, a state with good medical care. The state government is clearly inventing a large state-wide vaccination system at the same time as it's trying to get it up and running. That's like running a race while also trying to tie your shoes. Before the pandemic, we didn't even have plans for such a system. This is convincing evidence that we truly need a functional national health care system.
That is not good news. I certainly hope you, your family, and friends get through this without undue difficulty.Well, it looks like Civid-19 has hit home for me!
I just found out earlier today that both my daughter and my GF most likely have it.
Daughter went with roommate to get tested after finding out they had been exposed. Her roommate tested positive and my daughter tested negative, however, my daughter believes she got a false negative as she is having chills and has lost her sense of smell. Maybe it is a coincidental flu that happens to block her smell, but taht seems like a long shot.
GF is a police officer and got involved Thursday night (off duty) when an ambulance came to pick up a neighbor/friend who is on dialysis and in need of a kidney (which her son is willing to donate), but unable to lose enough weight to qualify for. GF masked up, but was not maintaining 6 feet. Friday, she got the word that the neighbor has Covid (which, as callous as it sounds, will likely be the neighbor's demise - she is not a healthy woman). GF went into quarantine due to her exposure. Today, my GF said that she was experiencing muscle soreness and she has no other easy explanation for that aside from Covid. Perhaps a positive is that she got the first dose of Moderna on Wednesday and gone through a period of fatigue on Thursday and half of Friday, so I am hoping her system has a leg up in gaining immunity.
Myself I spent Thursday night (after exposure) with the GF (not knowing that there was an exposure). Found out she was exposed Friday afternoon and she went into quarantine. So far, I have no symptoms. I am hoping that while the GF likely received a viral load that she did not carry a viral load to expose me (and she took a shower shortly after she returned). In my very limited understanding, I would expect that it would not be easy for a person to retain and transmit a viral load of the virus via second hand exposure, and expect she had not yet had enough time (less than 24 hours) to have replicated the virus enough to infect me.
I have a question for those of you with an advanced understanding of Covid 19. My GF works at Kennesaw State University. It has a well respected nursing school, so I would expect their HR department should have good access to medical expertise (if the CDC or Ga Dept of Health is not providing guidance).
For the sake of my question, forget that she is showing symptoms (soreness).
Their rule is:
If you've been exposed, you need to get a test on the 5th day. If the test is negative, then you can return to work after 7 days!
I don't understand this! If you test negative on day 5 (and don't have symptoms) why would you not return to work as soon as you got the test result?
If there is a chance you would get Covid on days 6 or 7, why wouldn't you want to wait until day 7 for the test?
The only explanation I can muster is that it is a hold-over from the earlier tests which required a 2 day wait before results were ready.
So my question is am I missing something? If not, they should allow return after a negative result of the test taken on the 5th day, right?
A January 22 follow-up report from the Montreal Heart Institute:FYI, the Montreal Heart Institute started using Colchicine for heart disease patients with positive results:
![]()
Bienvenue à l’Institut de cardiologie de Montréal
Bienvenue sur le site de l'Institut de cardiologie de Montréal, centre dédié à la prévention, la recherche et le traitement des maladies cardiovasculaires.www.icm-mhi.org
Yes, it has. Travel requirements are far too lax. Minnesota is going to start a lottery for those over 65 to get vaccinated starting at 5:00 AM tomorrow morning.This is not a huge surprise, but the Brazil variant has been detected in the U.S. (Minnesota).
![]()
First known case of Brazil COVID-19 variant in the U.S. found in Minnesota
The Minnesota Department of Health reports the patient recently returned from travel to Brazil.www.kare11.com
... called Molsen."A made-in-Canada vaccine to protect against COVID-19 is ...
Meanwhile, Molson is still making beer...... called Molsen.![]()
Oof ... well, that's embarrassing.Meanwhile, Molson is still making beer...
poop happensOof ... well, that's embarrassing.![]()
It Labatt not Molson. They'll call it Labatt dix-neuf.Meanwhile, Molson is still making beer...
I read that press release about the Colchicine clinical trial yesterday. As a low-dose oral treatment for PCR+ patients, it might be better tolerated than dexamethasone. I wonder if it's as effective as dex? If I remember, dex is given only to hospitalized patients by IV. Colchicine was given as an oral drug, at low dose, and was intended for infected people before they might need hospitalization. As someone with too much experience taking gluco-corticoids, I would be glad to have a choice other than dex.A January 22 follow-up report from the Montreal Heart Institute: Colchicine is proven to reduce hospitalizations, need of mechanical ventilation and deaths:
![]()
Bienvenue à l’Institut de cardiologie de Montréal
Bienvenue sur le site de l'Institut de cardiologie de Montréal, centre dédié à la prévention, la recherche et le traitement des maladies cardiovasculaires.www.icm-mhi.org
These are certainly interesting clinical results. However, whenever I see the words ‘approached statistical significance’, I groan because those words really mean ‘failed to achieve statistical significance’. It was close, but no cigar. The FDA will want to know what differences there were between the overall group of 4488 patients, and the PCR+ group of 4159 patients. Was the only difference the presence or absence of PCR confirmation of Covid-19? What about the placebo group? How many of them also had PCR-confirmed disease?The Montreal Heart Institute (MHI) study results have shown that colchicine has reduced by 21% the risk of death or hospitalizations in patients with COVID-19 compared to placebo. This result obtained for the global study population of 4488 patients approached statistical significance. The analysis of the 4159 patients in whom the diagnosis of COVID-19 was proven by a naso-pharyngeal PCR test has shown that the use of colchicine was associated with statistically significant reductions in the risk of death or hospitalization compared to placebo. In these patients with a proven diagnosis of COVID-19, colchicine reduced hospitalizations by 25%, the need for mechanical ventilation by 50%, and deaths by 44%. This major scientific discovery makes colchicine the world’s first oral drug that could be used to treat non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
You need the toilet handy. The trouble with oral covid-19 given orally is diarrhea in almost 100% of cases. It can also cause bone marrow suppression. That is why I used to treat acute gout with one dose of IV cochinine. The other problem is that an avaricious equity firm managed to patent a drug used for hundreds of years and hold everyone to a king's ransom for it. Dexamethasone is a much better, safer and cheaper drug. It is one of the cheapest drugs in the hospital pharmacy.I read that press release about the Colchicine clinical trial yesterday. As a low-dose oral treatment for PCR+ patients, it might be better tolerated than dexamethasone. I wonder if it's as effective as dex? If I remember, dex is given only to hospitalized patients by IV. Colchicine was given as an oral drug, at low dose, and was intended for infected people before they might need hospitalization. As someone with too much experience taking gluco-corticoids, I would be glad to have a choice other than dex.
After reading the press release, I focused on these words:
These are certainly interesting clinical results. However, whenever I see the words ‘approached statistical significance’, I groan because those words really mean ‘failed to achieve statistical significance’. It was close, but no cigar. The FDA will want to know what differences there were between the overall group of 4488 patients, and the PCR+ group of 4159 patients. Was the only difference the presence or absence of PCR confirmation of Covid-19? What about the placebo group? How many of them also had PCR-confirmed disease?
These statistical points do seem excessively picky, but they are essential for the FDA. I haven’t seen the data, but as a guess, the best outcome I can see is where the FDA tells the Montreal Heart Inst. to treat more PCR-confirmed patients until their data becomes both statistically and clinically significant.
The original protocol for the COLCORONA trial said it planned to enroll about 6,000 patients. But enrollment stopped at 4,500 patients.
As the data seems from the press release, I doubt if it would get FDA approval. I hope this colchicine result gets attention from people on Anthony Fauci’s staff. Their opinion will matter, as they know how to press the buttons of the right people at the FDA.
- Why did the trial stop early at 75% of the planned enrollment? At Interim Analysis, were the results futile, or were they better than expected?
- Or, was it too difficult to find enough patients willing to enter the trial?
To me, this study reinforces the stark truth I learned after my time with clinical trial design for anti-cancer drugs. Selection of patient population characteristics and planning of statistical analysis often end up making-or-breaking phase 3 clinical trials. At the time this study was planned, PCR tests to confirm Covid-19 diagnosis were not readily available, so it wasn’t required for patients. Later in 2020 it became the standard for confirming Covid-19 diagnosis. This may have been the reason why data were not available from enough PCR-confirmed patients to allow a statistically significant conclusion.
Colchicine can always be used off-label. I wonder what the side effects of 30 days of oral low-dose Colchicine are? @TLS Guy?