Yeah, it is strange that folks will follow the media narrative on IVM, whatever that may be. Thought this was interesting from the NIH website:
In 2015, the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine, in its only award for treatments of infectious diseases since six decades prior, honoured the discovery of ivermectin (IVM), a multifaceted drug deployed against some of the world's most devastating tropical diseases. Since March 2020...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The question is why ivermection doesn't seem to show any benefits in larger randomized trials? Perhaps the observational studies were in geographic areas where there were numerous parasitic infections, and the ivermectin helped with COVID by killing the parasites. I'm not saying this is "the" answer, but it seems plausible.
>>>“In the beginning, there was a lot of scientific interest in (ivermectin),” Mills said, because in computer modelling, it showed “signals” the anti-parasite drug could be effective against the COVID virus.
The drug, however, “also indicates it works for Ebola and Zika (virus) and everything,” he added.
Mills’ group, however, conducted the largest trial to show that ivermectin is not an effective treatment for COVID alone.
Unfortunately, those promoting ivermectin as a treatment are doing so blindly, Mills said, while critics dismiss the treatment unscientifically as a “horse dewormer,” when it has plenty of uses in humans.
“It’s a fantastic drug for conditions like river blindness and parasitic infections,” Mills said.
And the reason he doesn’t believe ivermectin should be completely dismissed is because “we don’t understand the role of parasite co-infection during COVID,” Mills said, including places where there are a lot of parasitic infections that end up in the lungs of patients.
“If you’re genuinely treating those (parasite) infections, you probably are having an effect on the COVID outcomes,” Mills said.<<<
COVID-19: Clinical trials need to shift focus of treatments, says B.C. researcher
www.healthing.ca