The comments about Harley's merely show no one understands. You can compare them to Bose as "stunted technologically" or as mere media hype, but as I said, that just shows no one understands the "Harley mystique."
What mystique? All they do is openly flaunt the pseudo-"rebel" lifestyle that they spent several decades disowning. Remember when the dealer would refuse you service if you were in a MC?
Harley's are built for cruising, not racing, and that's what they are used for.
And the Japanese, Korean, German, and British companies don't build functional cruisers? And Harley doesn't own 100% of Buell (a sportbike company)? And Harley's highest production line isn't the "sportster", the bike that has the entire XL dirt-track racing sport all to itself? And Harley doesn't pump millions of dollars every year into its "Screaming Eagle" racing division yearly?
Are Jap bikes better? Maybe. But when you own a Yamaha, do you belong to the Yamaha community?
Yes
When you see another Yamaha do you wave and acknowledge that you are both part of a brotherhood?
Have you ever ridden a motorcycle? A rider waves at every other rider.
Do you have a Yamaha tattoo? Or a Bose tattoo for that matter?
Personally, No. Nor do I get a Harley tattoo when I had a Harley. But I have seen both company logos tattooed on people.
What other corporation has people tattooing logos on their bodies?
Apple, Nike, Nintendo, Sega, Ford, Chevrolet, Dodge, BMW, Glock, Heckler & Koch, Warner Brothers, Disney, Marvel Comics, DC, Janus Films, Honda, Ducati, Kawasaki, Indian, Hasbro, Infinity, Fender, Ferrarri, Polaris, Huck-Spaulding, Fiat, Mercedes, and hundreds of other companies. I can direct you to
BME (Body Modification Ezine), they have tens of thousands of archived pictures of corporate tattoos.
Are there Yamaha reunions?
Yes. Some of the largest touring rallies and meets (Americade, HondaHoot) are sponsored by Japanese companies, and the paragon of biker rallies Daytona, is no longer Harley sponsored.
Japanese bikes may be technologically superior, but IMO they look like crap.
The Honda VTX, Honda Shadow A.C.E., Honda Sabre, Yamaha Road Star, Yamaha Royal Star, Yamaha V-Star, Suzuki Boulevard, Kawasaki Vulcan, BMW R1200c, And Moto-Guzzi California/Stone/Titanium are all traditonal V-twin cruisers of traditional styling. Most of them have fewer visable seams, machine work, more chrome, fewer plastic pieces, and smoother lines than Harleys.
And are Harley's worth the price? Harley's are an investment. They have resale value. Your Japanese bike loses value as soon as you drive it off the lot. The Harley? The older it gets, the more valuable it becomes.
Resale is the largest Harley myth. Just check your local paper, or browse Ebay for a little while. "Custom Harley, $40,000 invested, $20,000.OBO takes it" is a pretty common price. A Japanese cruiser only tends to lose 10% of its value in 10 years.
And that cherry '65 Panhead duo-glide you purchased new for $2550? Its worth about $8500. The same "investment" in a good stock portfolio could be worth $60,000. And also Harley has ramped-up production since 1984, there are few waiting lists (where costomers will pay for bikes they expect to be delivered next year), and most dealers now have stock "on the floor" year round.
Basically, everybody who wants one can buy one, and in 10/15/20/25 years, the used market is going to be flooded. Which bike is really the better future value: 2003 Harley-Davidson FXDWG Dyna Wide Glide 100th anniversay special editon (limited run of 20,000), or the 2004 Honda Rune (Limited run of 1000)?