
mtrycrafts
Seriously, I have no life.
Good reason for thatThe thing that gets me is the refusal to post specs.
....
Good reason for thatThe thing that gets me is the refusal to post specs.
....
My point was your argument of "deceptive tactics can't work for long" isn't valid. I'm not really a Bose hater at all, but let's not pretend that deceptive tactics don't work.
Enter the United States Political Process.My point was your argument of "deceptive tactics can't work for long" isn't valid. I'm not really a Bose hater at all, but let's not pretend that deceptive tactics don't work.
You can't compare Bose in a vacuum. It makes the point meaningless.I think you've missed most of my point.... It wasn't one of price comparisons.![]()
Their product, for the money, sucks. That's the problem. That's the ENTIRE problem.When was the last time you saw an Onkyo commercial? Bose has to pay those marketing costs somehow- they raise their price. Thats business101 Just because nobody else in the industry has decided to market their products this way isn't Bose's fault. They want maximum exposure to their products, they spend to accomplish and their pricing reflects it.. Whats the problem here?
I think you're taking my beer analogy in too much of a literal sense.You can't compare Bose in a vacuum. It makes the point meaningless.
If Bose cost $200 then it would be a quality product for the money. Maybe even exceptional.
Cost + quality = value.
If all those soft drinks/beers cost four time as much as their non-advertising competition, then it is a great correlation. But, the mulit-million dollar marketing campaign hasn't made my Pepsi cost four times as much as the micro-brew root beer. In fact, just the opposite is true. They've managed to maintain excellent pricing in spite of the high advertising budgets they have available.
Pretty much opposite of Bose.
Fault?To think it isn't Bose's fault that they charge far to much for the quality of their product because of their advertising budget is like saying that what happens to a bullet after a pull the trigger isn't my fault.
All the advertising in world won't sell ice to the Eskimos.It isn't Bose's fault that others don't advertise on TV (most do in magazines!) but it is their fault that they let advertising severely impact the price of their product.
If you mean automatic drip makers I agree. They don't get the water hot enough to extract the flavor adequately. But a Melita or clever coffee are manual, you have to boil the water in a tea kettle and then pour through, they do an excelent job. The only good automatic I am aware of is the Technivorm for about $300 which does get the water to boil. Big brother Swerd is happy with his, but I'm too cheap to get one plus he and Bonnie drink more coffee than my wife and I.Me beeing a cheap bastard (just checkout my speaker) think that drip coffee methods waste expensive coffee
I think if I would switch from Moka pot, what I'd really like is a semi-automatic like Rancilio Silvia. Unfortunately (see the reason above) I still don't have it, but I feel that eventually then I'll have a bigger kitchen than NY apt sized one I'm surely to get it
Didn't you buy that fancy soda at Whole Foods?Rick, remember that cream soda? That was good! It tasted f^%&in' great!
It wasn't cheap either at like 5 bucks for a six but I felt it was worth it.
What do you mean?! If Bose was a state it would be New Jersey.Bose on the other hand? New Jersey Dweller, puh-lease.![]()
Me too!I'm used and cheap ?!?![]()
![]()
That's two mentions... I could never find it but it's been years since I ran any searches on the name. I figured someone here would know more about him. I loved the tests he used to do.Yep, couple of greats in audioTom has a home page on line...
In most cases you pay for high quality workmanship and materials, not just a brand name. This is not so with Bose (IMO).Why do I spend thousands on watches when I can get one that performs similarly at Walmart? Because I bought what I wanted to. What you perceive as good value or a worthwhile product is not what someone else perceives as such.
Accuracy isn't the enjoyment in audio... The brain processes facts and figures in a way that has no bearing on the emotional enjoyment of perception.In most cases you pay for high quality workmanship and materials, not just a brand name. This is not so with Bose (IMO).
Would you pay 2k for a Breitling if it couldn't tell time correctly? Would you buy a gun that didn't shoot straight? A calculator that gave you the wrong answer? Accuracy is what nearly every industry strives for, audio should be no different.
People need to learn what accuracy in audio is and how to listen for it. Otherwise, anything that has the impression of bass and plays loud enough is labeled as fantastic.
Bose has a target audience, those looking for simplicity and have the money to pay for it. Everyone else who genuinely thinks that Bose sounds the best needs to be aware of what good sound is and the science behind it.
[/rant]
I'll do it....... I better not.
![]()
Fixed that for ya.I was in there with the Mrs and I saw the $5.00 "Orgasmic Chap Stick":
True, there has to be some trade off, but I don't think disregarding the need for accuracy all together is the way to do it.Accuracy isn't the enjoyment in audio... The brain processes facts and figures in a way that has no bearing on the emotional enjoyment of perception.
Absolute accuracy - the holy grail in audio being unachievable requires tradeoff- most peoples' compromise lends to a product that Bose manufactures. Us audio snobs are by far the minority.