I don't agree with those claims, no.
But I don't have a theory of what all happened, because I want to make an objective judgment with all the facts, not a subjective judgment based on emotion. We don't know all the facts (big parts missing, like flight recorders of 3 of the planes (IIRC)), but all I know is that in my mind (and the mind of a lot of others), things don't add up. I don't agree with everything out there, and a lot of it is disinformation. The only "assinine conspiracy website" I linked to was thewebfairy, and even then it was only because they have a clip from the news on it (although according to your own little conspiracy theory, you think that the clip was faked, correct? that's what you have been implying...)
But I don't think we'll ever have all the facts. By stonewalling any sort of investigation for a year, they didn't want us to have barely any facts.
But from the facts we do have (that most do not know about), I wouldn't be surprised if there was some sort of government involvement, or at least pre-knowledge of the event. It's not impossible, you know. It almost happened 40 years ago, so who is to say it could never actually happen, if it's for the good of the country, to protect the interests and the future of the country?
So we will never know what happened for sure - except for the people who accept the official story, and there's nothing wrong with that. I don't get mad at other people because they have different opinions than myself, and I don't call them crazy just because I don't agree with them.
Actually, I've posted all this a number of times, if you've been reading. I don't know what happened, and the scant proof out there for the official story isn't enough for me. I guess I'm just skeptical. But so are a lot of other people, including 1/2 of New York (they're the ones that got attacked, remember? I guess the 1/2 that are skeptical are just the crazy half of New York...).
And if you are going to talk about being a man, how about being a man yourself and admit you were wrong, and apologize for attacking me over and over again? I don't care one way or the other, but it's the principle of the matter. I respect you very much for your contributions on all these AV forums, but I am disappointed with your conduct here. Real men can admit when they're wrong, and know how to apologize. So how 'bouts it?
That's it. I'm done responding to you in this thread (unless, of course, I get an apology
). It's a waste of time for me, and I'm sure you feel the same way. People here can see the way you "debate," which is basically to avoid any real facts I post and stick to the "you're all crazy" thing. If it works for you, more power to ya!
It's not working on me, though. Which is why I'm through trying to debate this with you here.