T/S Parameters have never told the entire story. Ever.
It doesn't matter what I do or don't know about HSU driver. A subwoofer is a sum of its parts and the driver alone is only one aspect. Further, you're making completely wild claims about the HSU as if it's designed poorly.
Well duh. The drivers aren't sold to DIYers and car audio guys. Why would anyone give you T/S parameters of their drivers if they're not of benefit to anyone? HSU used to sell a car audio driver though and as far as I recall you could even get T/S parameters for it.
http://www.hsuresearch.com/products/asw-1203.html
Really, a sealed sub with an fs of 26hz is well regarded for HT? really now?
Cuz Gee, I'm modeling this thing, and something must be wrong. I'm getting an F3 at 55hz and an F10 at about 27hz. IOW, I'd need to EQ the **** out of it just to get decent output at HT frequencies?
A sealed 18 has more linear
displacement than a ported 15? You sure about that?
Of course, at 20hz the sealed eD would have a sensitivity of 77db/w/m so it actually NEEDS that extra power to "EQ" up. Forgot to mention that one buddy.
Wow. So now an Fs of 26hz for an 18" driver is
low. Gee, and here I thought the Re XXX had a low Fs.
As does any decent driver in a well damped sealed enclsure with Q = 6
It must use a driver I'm not familiar with then, a driver whose T/S parameters are not available (shame on you eD!). Because the driver I'm looking at is
27db down at 10hz in that box!
None of which
actually show the eD A7S-450 can do 121db @ 50hz or 109db @ 20hz (more in low tune mode mind you ) for any transient at low distortion. Unless you beg to differ?
Good for it. Now
what makes it better than HSU?
Luckily the driver isn't sold to DIYers who will try to run it with an EP2500. That's the part you don't get. The HSU is made for a specific goal and for that goal it's perfectly fine. Modern foam surrounds are nothing like the 1970s foam surrounds.
You garuntee it, so it has to be true
Of course with a higher than normal Fs you also get added sensitivity which means less need for extensive wattage. Forgot to mention that didn't you?
I'm impressed. You sound like the type of person who would go into his amplifiers and replace caps. IE the sort who thinks the parts mean more than the end result.
Notice how all those things are important for
high power handling subs? Which the HSU isn't? See, it was designed as a series of compromises to hit a certain price point. Sure there's subs out there that can not only take 5000w but also need 5000w to be appreciable. You just don't
get it.
I guess 99% of finished subwoofer mfgs aren't very respectable because they don't sell to DIYers
You mean the rythmik sub that also costs a solid $320 more? Is that the one?
You would hope the company charging more would be using more effective components. ANd I could give half a **** about "quality" of components if both get the job done and neither deteriorates in the next 20 years.
So, yes, a 1200 dollar sub hopefully is overall better than a 900 dollar sub.
More importantly, show me measurably proof that those things (with the exception of the direct servo feedback) do anything to the ultimate sound quality in the equivalent behaving box.