the lawyers letter is standard fare...all bluster, no substance...
he was taking a shot that someone would 'fold'...
he threatens legal action, then responds that he didn't threaten...
I especially like this part in his response:
I can certainly understand your negative reaction at having received a letter from an attorney, and perhaps this in itself is viewed as "threatening".
and he spends the rest of that response back-peddling, deflecting and trying to convince the guy he threatened, that he didn't threaten him...lol
he makes a statement as if it were fact 'both false and defamatory'
he will not decide that, a court/arbitrator will...
should have said 'my client believes'
like the attorney researched all the technical merits and came to the conclusion they are not true...
I don't blame the lawyer, he's just trying to make a buck, he doesn't have to know the facts of the case, or believe in it, just do what the client asks within ethical bounds...honestly, he probably thought it was a crock of shyte as he wrote it, but he's got a mortgage too...