Would you include Rotel in this list? I would think so. And based on the list, I would guess you would include the v3900 from Yamaha. The comparison between a 250 Watt/ch Emotiva to my current Rotel AVR and the Yamaha v3900 proves what I mentioned earlier. Yes you get more flexibility too, but the extra power absolutely brings the speakers to life and reveals far more information than just running an AVR...
I've done the comparison with 2 high end AVR's now and there is a major difference.
My comments were based on my (and others with keen piano player ears too in several instances) experience in comparing AVRs/Amps using music CDs via analog connections with high end players and speakers including the 802D, S8 and Thiel. I am sure if sound processing other than amplification are at play, they would have colored the sound and yielded different results.
Extra power can bring speakers to life if it is needed but not at low volume where the amp in question is no where near, at say 10% of its rated power limit. It wouldn't make any sense from engineering and science stand points. It is not just paper specs, I do know the theories behind amps. I guess we may define low volume differently so it is hard to say whether we actually disagree or not.
I know this is off the topic, but just a couple of interesting facts about reviews:
- I just read a Stereophile review on a Rotel amp. The reviewer claimed that at high volume the Rotel amp brought the speakers to life but at low volume he did not like how the Rotel sound. Go figure, I thought it was the speakers making the sound! After being years in this hobby I still feel the need for a jargon dictionary in order to have a fighting chance to understand some of those reviews. And I mean the non technical part.
- British reviewers (see WhatHiFi, Home Cinema, HiFi News etc.) regularly rate Yamaha, Denon and other NA AVRs higher than their Rotel and NAD counterparts. Arcam is the only product that they ranked top most of the time. In NA, the opposite tends to be true more often than not. Why? We can all take a guess.
Hi-fi amps are designed and built to reproduce sound faithfully. In order to achieve their main goal of being faithful to the recordings, as long as they are operating within their limits they really need to sound pretty much the same instead of being majorly different.
I have no idea how (level matched, bypassed all SP, AB with another person doing the switching etc.) you compare your Rotel and Arcam AVRs and I have never listened to any Rotel AVR. My experience with the Arcam AVR300 was so good that I doubt there was anything better, but then I found my Denon sounding just as good. When I say they sound good I mean they sound like what I (by memory) heard in concert halls, only to a degree though.
By the way, I am sorry I got you mixed up with CraigV in another thread so let me repeat my question here. Do you believe your Arcam can power your 802 adequately? I know nothing about the 802 but if they are anything like my dream speaker 802D then I really think you need to add an external amp. In fact, the 802 could also be
one of the reasons why you get different results from your AVRs.