Well, you then guessed wrong Minus.
Sheeesh. Why am I always caught in the middle of these controversies?
You posted nothing...absolutely nothing about Craig's List scams as MDS did. Let me help you: I do not need an education on check kiting, check overwriting and fake checks. I've been banking for quite some time, and none of these things are new to me. And I've never been taken by such a scam. (I was once however, taken by a post dated check, for which the drafter received nothing in value, but that's another story).
That's all you wrote about. One can verify the authenticity (and worth) of an instrument once they have it in their possession. This is easily done with a postal mo. It is not so readily done with other instruments. So while your posts are helpful and informative to some, they did not go to the meat of the matter as MDS's post did: outlining the basic format of these useless replies.
My point stands: As Matt has given out his email address, what further harm can be done by demanding a postal mo, and verifying its' authenticity upon receipt? About one minute of Matt's time. The roadmap for any "harm" that could occur has already been laid: Matt has delivered his email address to these people. But that can be fixed (minimized) by blocking their address, and never opening any unknown attachments. And that's all the further I would invest in this venture...as
I posted pages ago.