I have watched the first half of this and notice one glaring thing that seems to be constant within nearly
all religious interpretation: The view you start out with determines your drawn conclusions.
An example of this could be that someone who believes in Christianity or another similar religion might perhaps say that all the religions share such similarity because they have the same roots (possibly even the same) just retold as times change to keep with societal will as nothing can live in stagnation.
Also, it is a well known fact that the bible was written by a committee raised by a Pagan king who saw his rule slipping to the new religion. This would explain much of its Pagan roots and throwbacks to ancient culture.
*Please note I cannot speak for a Christian as I am not a religious person I am just giving possible examples [which would probably not be agreed with]. There are numerous ways one could
choose to dissect any religious text the authors of this documentary chose one way - I would choose yet another while someone who truly believes would choose yet another etc...
Edit: This is the first time I have seen much of this put together in such a clean fashion, but to be honest this seems like one large plagiarized document as I have seen/read nearly all of this material previously. Conspiracy theories/theorists will always be around the question is which do you buy into
.