If Buckeye Nut can do it, so can I

darien87

darien87

Audioholic Spartan
Frankly, I'm getting pretty sick of Buckeye Nut's constant anti-liberal, conspiracy theory tirades, so I thought I would start one of my own.

'Spectacular attacks' in Iraq expected

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iraq12jul12,1,3520868.story

I find it extremely convenient timing for Bush that the Director of Homeland Security has a "gut feeling" that the U.S. is due for more attacks, and reports of "impending" terrorist activity are coming out at the exact time that Bush is trying to defend his support for this pointless war in Iraq.

Gimme a break. Just more Conservative tactics to try to get us living in fear, so we'll approve any crazy "anti-terrorist" plan they come up with. :rolleyes:
 
avaserfi

avaserfi

Audioholic Ninja
There is a reason why right after Sept 11 everyone was all for the anti-terror tactics: Americans as a whole are very reactionary. When Bush saw he could make a grab at a lot more power then he is really supposed to have he went for it, as I am sure most would have, and now that everything has settled people realize that he is being overly controlling in many facets and his approval ratings have plummeted, but in all reality what does he have to lose? He can pretty much do whatever he wants and as long as he doesn't get vetoed in congress which seem unlikely he is fine. It is clear he isn't too worried about damaging the Republican party image so he can go about taking care of his own/families agenda.
 
gmichael

gmichael

Audioholic Spartan
Bush Should Quit!!!

The speech George W. Bush SHOULD give:

Normally, I start these things out by saying "My Fellow Americans." Not doing it this time. If the polls are any indication, I don't know who more than half of you are anymore. I do know something terrible has happened, and that you're really not fellow Americans any longer.

I'll cut right to the chase here: I quit. Now before anyone gets all in a lather about me quitting to avoid impeachment, or to avoid prosecution or something, let me assure you: there's been no breaking of laws or impeachable offenses in this office.

The reason I'm quitting is simple. I'm fed up with you people.

I'm fed up because you have no understanding of what's really going on in the world. Or of what's going on in this once-great nation of ours. And the majority of you are too damned lazy to do your homework and figure it out.

Let's start local. You've been sold a bill of goods by politicians and the news media. Polls show that the majority of you think the economy is in the tank. And that's despite record numbers of homeowners including record numbers of MINORITY homeowners. And while we're mentioning minorities, I'll point out that minority business ownership is at an all-time high. Our unemployment rate is as low as it ever was during the Clinton Administration. I've mentioned all those things before, but it doesn't seem to have sunk in.

Despite the shock to our economy of 9/11, the stock market has rebounded to record levels and more Americans than ever are participating in these markets. Meanwhile, all you can do is whine about gas prices, and most of you are too damn stupid to realize that gas prices are high because there's increased demand in other parts of the world, and because a small handful of noisy idiots are more worried about polar bears and beachfront property than your economic security.

We face real threats in the world. Don't give me this ~blood for oil" thing. If I was trading blood for oil I would've already seized Iraq's oil fields and let the rest of the country go to hell. And don't give me this 'Bush Lied People Died' crap either. If I was the liar you morons take me for, I could've easily had chemical weapons planted in Iraq so they could be 'discovered.' Instead, I owned up to the fact that the intelligence was faulty. Let me remind you that the rest of the world thought Saddam had the goods, same as me. Let me also remind you that regime change in Iraq was official US policy before I came into office. Some guy named 'Clinton' established that policy. Bet you didn't know that, did you?

You idiots need to understand that we face a unique enemy. Back during the cold war, there were two major competing political and economic models squaring off. We won that war, but we did so because fundamentally, the Communists wanted to survive, just as we do. We were simply able to outspend and out-tech them.

That's not the case this time. The soldiers of our new enemy don't care if they survive. In fact, they want to die. That'd be fine, as long as they weren't also committed to taking as many of you with them as they can. But they are. They want to kill you. And the bastards are all over the globe.

You should be grateful that they haven't gotten any more of us here in the United States since September 11. But you're not. That's because you've got no idea how hard a small number of intelligence, military, law enforcement and homeland security people have worked to make sure of that. When this whole mess started, I warned you that this would be a long and difficult fight. I'm disappointed how many of you people think a long and difficult fight amounts to a single season of 'Survivor'.

Instead, you've grown impatient. You're incapable of seeing things through the long lens of history, the way our enemies do. You think that wars should last a few months, a few years, tops.

Making matters worse, you actively support those who help the enemy. Every time you buy the New York Times, every time you send a donation to a cut-and-run Democrat's political campaign, well, dammit, you might just as well Fedex a grenade launcher to a Jihadist. It amounts to the same thing.

In this day and age, it's easy enough to find the truth. It's all over the Internet. It just isn't on the pages of the New York Times or on NBC News. But even if it were, I doubt you'd be any smarter. Most of you would rather watch American Idol.

I could say more about your expectations that the government will always be there to bail you out, even if you're too stupid to leave a city that's below sea level and has a hurricane approaching. I could say more about your insane belief that government, not your own wallet, is where the money comes from. But I've come to the conclusion that were I to do so, it would sail right over your heads.

So I quit. I'm going back to Crawford. I've got an energy-efficient house down there (Al Gore could only dream) and the capability to be fully self-sufficient. No one ever heard of Crawford before I got elected, and as soon as I'm done here pretty much no one will ever hear of it again. Maybe I'll be lucky enough to die of old age before the last pillars of America fall.

Oh, and by the way, Cheney's quitting too. That means Pelosi is your new President. You asked for it. Watch what she does carefully, because I still have a glimmer of hope that there're just enough of you remaining who are smart enough to turn this thing around in 2008.

So that's it. God bless what's left of America. Some of you know what I mean.

The rest of you, * off.
 
B

Buckeye_Nut

Audioholic Field Marshall
Gimme a break. Just more Conservative tactics to try to get us living in fear, so we'll approve any crazy "anti-terrorist" plan they come up with. :rolleyes:
Much of what you speak is why the libs will lose the WH again in '08. The lefts denial of the terrorism threat on our own soil is of no revelation to me.(in spite of many foiled attacks on our own soil since 9/11 :most recently the 2007 foiled Ft. Dix attack:not to mention the many successful attacks carried out in western nations) Some even deny that we're currently fighting a war on terrorism on many fronts:rolleyes:

The crazy stuff going on on London alone should make you want to keep on your toes and aware of our surroundings. I dont know about the 'living in fear' thing you speak of.... that must be a left thang....

They're only doing their job by telling America to keep on it's toes, especially in the summer months which isnt too unreasonable to ask.(which was their point) The hypocrisy of the left is that they mock the warnings as they're given, but they'll go nuts if something happens when no warning is given by those in charge. Luckily for us.... they're not in charge:D
 
Last edited:
B

Buckeye_Nut

Audioholic Field Marshall
Can't wait to laugh in your face on this one.
I hate to break it to you but neither Hillary or Obama are electable....

They'll certainly make it an interesting race with the media riding their collective coat tails....but it wont be enough for victory.
 
darien87

darien87

Audioholic Spartan
I hate to break it to you but neither Hillary or Obama are electable....

They'll certainly make it an interesting race with the media riding their collective coat tails....but it wont be enough for victory.
We'll see. Hopefully you'll man up and admit how wrong you were when it happens.
 
darien87

darien87

Audioholic Spartan
But of course..............................:D
Then again, who knows. I may have to eat my own words. In the last election, I wasn't much of a fan of Kerrry, but I thought there was NO way that America was stupid enough to sign up for another 4 years of Bush's crap. But I was way wrong on that one.
 
gmichael

gmichael

Audioholic Spartan
As someone already pointed out, I didn't make that up. It's an email I received from a friend who's a policeman.
Thought it would fit in. Although I don't agree with all of it, it is correct in many ways.
 
zhimbo

zhimbo

Audioholic General
I hate to break it to you but neither Hillary or Obama are electable....
Why do so many people believe this about Clinton (and a few believe this about Obama, even more mysteriously).

Go here:

http://pollster.com/08presidentialprimary.php

Go to the bottom set of graphs. It's organized with Republicans in rows, and Democrats in columns.

Clinton is essentially tied with Giuliani and McCain, is ahead of Romney, and probably ahead of Thompson (not a lot of data for that last one).

Obama does slightly better, ditto for Edwards. Gore's in pretty good shape, too, although there isn't so much data for him yet (assuming he even runs). But he won the popular vote once already, so we know he's "electable".

I can only assume you're projecting your own feelings when you say these people aren't "electable". Clearly, they are.
 
gmichael

gmichael

Audioholic Spartan
Why do so many people believe this about Clinton (and a few believe this about Obama, even more mysteriously).

Go here:

http://pollster.com/08presidentialprimary.php

Go to the bottom set of graphs. It's organized with Republicans in rows, and Democrats in columns.

Clinton is essentially tied with Giuliani and McCain, is ahead of Romney, and probably ahead of Thompson (not a lot of data for that last one).

Obama does slightly better, ditto for Edwards. Gore's in pretty good shape, too, although there isn't so much data for him yet (assuming he even runs). But he won the popular vote once already, so we know he's "electable".

I can only assume you're projecting your own feelings when you say these people aren't "electable". Clearly, they are.
I'd rather vote for Jimmy Carter.
 
zhimbo

zhimbo

Audioholic General
The speech George W. Bush SHOULD give:

Normally, I start these things out by saying "My Fellow Americans." Not doing it this time. If the polls are any indication, I don't know who more than half of you are anymore. I do know something terrible has happened, and that you're really not fellow Americans any longer.
I think this thing is silly, but I'll give it one bit of praise: it does nicely capture the childish petulance of King Chimpy pretty well.
 
gmichael

gmichael

Audioholic Spartan
I think this thing is silly, but I'll give it one bit of praise: it does nicely capture the childish petulance of King Chimpy pretty well.

Of coarse you think it's silly. It makes too much sense and contains way too many facts.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top