On Trump

[Dude#1279435]

So it wasn't a preacher friend of the family that called Tyler's dad after recognizing Tyler in photos? Hard to know with the Daily Mail in any case

It was either the NY Post or Daily Mail, and the Post's was so slim an article.

 

[mtrycrafts]

perhaps once the Dems put up a worthwhile candidate............

Why don't you run? I have 2 strikes against me.

 

[William Lemmerhirt]

perhaps once the Dems put up a worthwhile candidate............

What’d ya mean? They tried the hyena. Just think. The world would’ve been saved by now. If only she’d have won.

 

[Dude#1279435]

What’d ya mean? They tried the hyena. Just think. The world would’ve been saved by now. If only she’d have won.

Orangutan.

 

[William Lemmerhirt]

Orangutan.

Welcome to the jungle!

 

[Dude#1279435]

Charlie Kirk’s Reaction to Taylor Swift Engagement Resurfaces After His Death

He had a lot to say. The post Charlie Kirk’s Reaction to Taylor Swift Engagement Resurfaces After His Death appeared first on Reality Tea.

www.yahoo.com

>>>He said of the singer’s engagement: “This is something that I hope will make Taylor Swift more conservative.” He added that marrying Travis Kelce could “de-radicalize” her and could make her “go from a cat lady to a JD Vance supporter.”

There has been speculation that the NFL star may have Republic leanings after he said it would be an “honor” to have Donald Trump attend the Super Bowl earlier this year.

Kirk also stated that Taylor should “have more children than she has houses.” He told the singer to “Engage in reality more … Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.”<<<


Doesn't sound too good. No don't let her decide. Honestly, I think most women do want the man to lead, but she's not cattle either LOL.

 

[GO-NAD!]

Charlie Kirk’s Reaction to Taylor Swift Engagement Resurfaces After His Death

He had a lot to say. The post Charlie Kirk’s Reaction to Taylor Swift Engagement Resurfaces After His Death appeared first on Reality Tea.

www.yahoo.com

>>>He said of the singer’s engagement: “This is something that I hope will make Taylor Swift more conservative.” He added that marrying Travis Kelce could “de-radicalize” her and could make her “go from a cat lady to a JD Vance supporter.”

There has been speculation that the NFL star may have Republic leanings after he said it would be an “honor” to have Donald Trump attend the Super Bowl earlier this year.

Kirk also stated that Taylor should “have more children than she has houses.” He told the singer to “Engage in reality more … Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.”<<<


Doesn't sound too good. No don't let her decide. Honestly, I think most women do want the man to lead, but she's not cattle either LOL.

On a somewhat related note.

Women’s suffrage is apparently up for debate again in America | Arwa Mahdawi

The country’s finest male intellectuals – including some in positions of power – are weighing in on the matter

www.theguardian.com

 

[highfigh]

perhaps once the Dems put up a worthwhile candidate............

Both parties need better candidates.

 

[highfigh]

On a somewhat related note.

Women’s suffrage is apparently up for debate again in America | Arwa Mahdawi

The country’s finest male intellectuals – including some in positions of power – are weighing in on the matter

www.theguardian.com

OK, let's see who says "Oh, you just sit there and look pretty- we'll handle the voting".

 

[GO-NAD!]

OK, let's see who says "Oh, you just sit there and look pretty- we'll handle the voting".

He'd better sleep with one eye open.

 

[highfigh]

He'd better sleep with one eye open.

I wouldn't even bother trying to sleep and I would always sit with my back to the wall or in a corner.

 

[Mikado463]

Both parties need better candidates.

LOL, have for some time now .............

 

[GO-NAD!]

Both parties need better candidates.

LOL, have for some time now .............

But, who chooses the candidates? The entire American electorate (registered party voters) chooses. So, the question is, why don't Americans choose better candidates? You have a direct say in the matter.

Up here, actual party members nominate, then choose, their preferred candidates. The process can vary a bit, from party to party, but that's it in a nut shell.

Federal party members make up 2-3% of the population, or about 4% of eligible voters.

 

[Mikado463]

But, who chooses the candidates? The entire American electorate (registered party voters) chooses. So, the question is, why don't Americans choose better candidates? You have a direct say in the matter.

Exactly, tells you a bunch how brain dead we have become ! on BOTH sides of the aisle !!

 

[mtrycrafts]

From one to five is what I have been reading. I guess when so much hate is directed towards them, one bound to snap.
My Q is how many mass shooters are not trans?
In case you are interested:
Charlie Kirk in his own words: ‘prowling Blacks’ and ‘the great replacement strategy’ | Charlie Kirk shooting | The Guardian

And then one wonders who is the hater:
Dems hit with 'violent and graphic' threats as right-wing anger boils over

And the hits keep coming, a firebrand:
Charlie Kirk’s Reaction to Taylor Swift Engagement Resurfaces After His Death

 

[highfigh]

But, who chooses the candidates? The entire American electorate (registered party voters) chooses. So, the question is, why don't Americans choose better candidates? You have a direct say in the matter.

Up here, actual party members nominate, then choose, their preferred candidates. The process can vary a bit, from party to party, but that's it in a nut shell.

Federal party members make up 2-3% of the population, or about 4% of eligible voters.

The parties choose the candidates, most voters are too freaking lazy and uninterested to dig into them. The parties tell the public who will be climbing out of the clown cars, we don't make suggestions as to who would be the best candidates. In theory, we should have direct input, but we don't. We have 'representatives', but the last times I sent a message to Ron Johnson (R), it took months to receive a response and 3/4 of the letter was 'Thank you for your excellent question', followed by more bullcrap about what they see as their role in US government. Another problem is: no term limits. They stay until they die or do something so stupid that nobody in the party will let them stay. It happens on both sides- look at how long the Democrats claimed that Biden was mentally competent and now that he's out of office, many in the party are saying that the realty was hidden. Also, they're saying that the pardons and auto-pen weren't really him in control.

No elections are like the BS we have. Campaigns take forever and if you want to see stupidity, look how much is spent- they all talk about feeding and housing people, but when one candidate for POTUS sends more than $1 Billion and the other isn't far behind, it can boggle a mind.

As a kid and teen, I used to think my dad was just being negative when he would ask "This is the best we have?" during elections.

The problem with our elections and shortening them is that so many candidates have well-hidden dirt that they fight to conceal and their teams of lawyers are good at their jobs.

 

[lovinthehd]

Both parties need better candidates.

The republicans need it far more at this point, tho.

 

[highfigh]

The republicans need it far more at this point, tho.

Step back and look again. You can't bring yourself to see that the Democrats need to clean their own house, as well. I'm not posting this as a way to poke the Democrats, I do it because the country needs to fix a helluva lot of problems.

 

[lovinthehd]

Step back and look again. You can't bring yourself to see that the Democrats need to clean their own house, as well. I'm not posting this as a way to poke the Democrats, I do it because the country needs to fix a helluva lot of problems.

All I need to look at is drumphy and the maga dimwits in congress....no competition.

 

[highfigh]

All I need to look at is drumphy and the maga dimwits in congress....no competition.

Sure, sweep the Democrat problems under the rug.