On Trump

[Dude#1279435]

So it wasn't a preacher friend of the family that called Tyler's dad after recognizing Tyler in photos? Hard to know with the Daily Mail in any case

It was either the NY Post or Daily Mail, and the Post's was so slim an article.

 

[mtrycrafts]

perhaps once the Dems put up a worthwhile candidate............

Why don't you run? I have 2 strikes against me.

 

[William Lemmerhirt]

perhaps once the Dems put up a worthwhile candidate............

What’d ya mean? They tried the hyena. Just think. The world would’ve been saved by now. If only she’d have won.

 

[Dude#1279435]

What’d ya mean? They tried the hyena. Just think. The world would’ve been saved by now. If only she’d have won.

Orangutan.

 

[William Lemmerhirt]

Orangutan.

Welcome to the jungle!

 

[Dude#1279435]

Charlie Kirk’s Reaction to Taylor Swift Engagement Resurfaces After His Death

He had a lot to say. The post Charlie Kirk’s Reaction to Taylor Swift Engagement Resurfaces After His Death appeared first on Reality Tea.

www.yahoo.com

>>>He said of the singer’s engagement: “This is something that I hope will make Taylor Swift more conservative.” He added that marrying Travis Kelce could “de-radicalize” her and could make her “go from a cat lady to a JD Vance supporter.”

There has been speculation that the NFL star may have Republic leanings after he said it would be an “honor” to have Donald Trump attend the Super Bowl earlier this year.

Kirk also stated that Taylor should “have more children than she has houses.” He told the singer to “Engage in reality more … Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.”<<<


Doesn't sound too good. No don't let her decide. Honestly, I think most women do want the man to lead, but she's not cattle either LOL.

 

[GO-NAD!]

Charlie Kirk’s Reaction to Taylor Swift Engagement Resurfaces After His Death

He had a lot to say. The post Charlie Kirk’s Reaction to Taylor Swift Engagement Resurfaces After His Death appeared first on Reality Tea.

www.yahoo.com

>>>He said of the singer’s engagement: “This is something that I hope will make Taylor Swift more conservative.” He added that marrying Travis Kelce could “de-radicalize” her and could make her “go from a cat lady to a JD Vance supporter.”

There has been speculation that the NFL star may have Republic leanings after he said it would be an “honor” to have Donald Trump attend the Super Bowl earlier this year.

Kirk also stated that Taylor should “have more children than she has houses.” He told the singer to “Engage in reality more … Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.”<<<


Doesn't sound too good. No don't let her decide. Honestly, I think most women do want the man to lead, but she's not cattle either LOL.

On a somewhat related note.

Women’s suffrage is apparently up for debate again in America | Arwa Mahdawi

The country’s finest male intellectuals – including some in positions of power – are weighing in on the matter

www.theguardian.com

 

[highfigh]

perhaps once the Dems put up a worthwhile candidate............

Both parties need better candidates.

 

[highfigh]

On a somewhat related note.

Women’s suffrage is apparently up for debate again in America | Arwa Mahdawi

The country’s finest male intellectuals – including some in positions of power – are weighing in on the matter

www.theguardian.com

OK, let's see who says "Oh, you just sit there and look pretty- we'll handle the voting".

 

[GO-NAD!]

OK, let's see who says "Oh, you just sit there and look pretty- we'll handle the voting".

He'd better sleep with one eye open.

 

[highfigh]

He'd better sleep with one eye open.

I wouldn't even bother trying to sleep and I would always sit with my back to the wall or in a corner.

 

[Mikado463]

Both parties need better candidates.

LOL, have for some time now .............

 

[GO-NAD!]

Both parties need better candidates.

LOL, have for some time now .............

But, who chooses the candidates? The entire American electorate (registered party voters) chooses. So, the question is, why don't Americans choose better candidates? You have a direct say in the matter.

Up here, actual party members nominate, then choose, their preferred candidates. The process can vary a bit, from party to party, but that's it in a nut shell.

Federal party members make up 2-3% of the population, or about 4% of eligible voters.