Yep. Might not be worth it to some people. But ATMOS is worth every penny to some of us.
What is it you like about it so much?
I think the results are very variable. I have only one movie disc that really utilizes the technology to the full. Most audio discs and streams are upmixed two channel recordings.
I have two Atmos recordings from DGG. The one from Vienna in St.Stephen's cathedral is excellent. The other the mix is messed up.
Streaming is a problem because of the volume limitation by Dolby. That is absurd. In addition there is no way to stream lossless audio in Atmos at present.
But the real issue is that the mixess are variable. The BPO are the leaders in streaming Atmos, but it is a work in progress, and the Atmos mix is not always better then the two channel mix.
When it comes to movies very few really utilize the technology and put little program and power to the speakers other than the front three.
If this technology is going to be exploited to its full capability, then people will have to invest a lot more in their surrounds and powering.
I say this, as the only multichannel disc I have that really puts power to the rear speakers, critics panned as unplayable. Well it is not unplayable, but I can see why it would be on the vast majority of systems.
Personally I would not have invested in Atmos, if I did not have all seven very capable speakers and had plenty of spare amps handy and could build four good ceiling speakers for little money.
I don't think there is enough good program out there to really justify the expense. That includes surrounds and ceiling speakers. I could just use what I had, as putting them to use was as good a place to store them as any. I think for most, the money would be much better spent on the front two or three and a decent sub or two.
I think probably the majority of the rooms can not really benefit anyway.