@TLS Guy Apologies, I was definitely irritable earlier on in the day; have had a cup of tea and calmed down
I don't doubt that everything you said is accurate, and I'm certainly not holding myself out as an expert in anything. Unfortunately, the article is not intended as a complete history of multichannel audio; it has a very specific and limited purpose. However you and
@everettT honed in on the relevant point in your most recent posts, so I couldn’t be happier with that, thank you. I’m going to quote what I think are the important parts:
“Dolby surround was a matrix three channel system contrived from the cinema two channel…
The Dolby Surround technology consisted of three channels—left, right, and a single surround channel, which was matrixed in with the front two channels. (This single surround channel was frequently sent to two rear speakers, resulting in a four-speaker system.) ….
Dolby Surround got an upgrade in 1987, when the Dolby Pro Logic system was introduced. Dolby Pro Logic is a four-channel version of the early three-channel Dolby Surround technology, with a separate center channel, primarily used for dialogue. To this day, Dolby Pro Logic is the surround sound standard for prerecorded VHS videotapes…
The answer to that question is that Dolby did NOT have a matrixed center channel until 1987…”
Now, my inexperienced reading of all that would indicate the following to me:
If we wound the clocks back to 1982, and I was an early adapter of Dolby Surround technology – let’s say I bought an original Yamaha DSP-1 surround processor (and an amplifier to pair it with), I would likely have a 3.0 channel setup that looked like this, with four physical speakers, including two physical rear speakers to share the mono surround channel.
View attachment 59654
Then let’s say I upgraded in 1987 to a Pro Logic 1 receiver like a Pioneer VSX-454 – this is the point in history where I (the Dolby home consumer) could add a nondiscrete centre speaker to my setup, making it a 4.0 system. Have I got that all reasonably correct?
View attachment 59655