Huh...
Well Kurt maybe my memory is slippin. I surely thought we covered it in a thread with shady before. In any case, I’m not saying group delay can NOT be audible. My thoughts though, align with what
@Verdinut was saying. A low Q well designed and built subwoofer should exhibit low enough group delay as to not be audible during almost all music playback. Movie playback, which I am also a big fan of had much more potential for group delay to be audible, but probably not relevant. Who knows, maybe I have group delay.....
Well it said that sealed have less group delay that ported subs, if that is indeed true, the sealed sub would be preferred over ported. I don't know if that claim has been substantiated through objective testing. There is a gentlemen here with Audioholics that claim " group delay" could be audible. Tight bass is considered "musical" bass without a lot of over hang.
Well, I don't really have reason to dispute anything in the bolded text (aside from the "gentleman" part
). However, I don't usually use the term "group delay", as I usually think of it in terms of bloated bass or too much overhang. Likely, in the middle of a conversation, if GD were the term being bandied about, I would probably conform to using it, but I don't understand what the "group" being delayed is so am not too quick to use it!
In accord with Auditor55's statement, I certainly would claim that delay or overhang
can be audible, and I would agree that tight bass without overhang is much more musical than the alternative.
But Auditor55 is the one who would know who he is referring to - or he may remember content more than author. In actuality, although he may not have been the originator, I don't think ShadyJ would dispute anything in those two statements. He may want to qualify them, but I believe very few would argue those, as worded, as being outright false statements.