Currently I have Pioneer SP-FS52 towers and a Polk PSW10. (Not the best subwoofer). The Pioneers sound very nice but they definitely need a sub, and they are pretty ugly. I live in a small apartment (with a wife who's not thrilled about lots of speakers) which is why I was so intrigued by the BP9060's and how sleek and thin they are. Trying to minimize the amount of speakers and clutter. I guess aesthetics are important - one of the reasons I'm not considering SVS Ultra towers, which I think are eyesores.
I trust you're right about the integrated subs not being "real subs" - do you think they'd still be a substantial upgrade over my current system? It's much more important for me to have deep bass with music than it is to have earth-shaking rumble in movies.
Seems odd that you don't like the looks of the Pios, but like the socks on the GE or the DT. All seems about the same ho-hum appearance to me (but I am also a fan of the understated looks).
Oh yes! The GE T2 are EXCELLENT speakers! The imaging is amazing, very easy to think that a center speaker is playing when it is not. This is another advantage over the DT, those bipoles tend to not image as well as monopoles.
The GE T2 are great with music! I guess on some of the deepest notes on HipHop and such, a real bass-head might want a little more SPL, but if HipHop, electronica, and pipe organs are not your thing, you will be quite satisfied!
For reference--I demoed both the DT (previous model) and the GE T2, but bought the T2. Later, I added a pair of the DT SM350 to my lineup, have considered using these as my surrounds, but never yet. I do own a set of the lower end Infinity Primus, and a boutique Philharmonitor too.