First I’m not suggesting Trump is innocent but a prosecutors job is to take facts and create a narrative to prove guilt. Mueller did a fine job of that but in a court of law you have a defense attorney to cross examine witnesses and get evidence thrown out for legitimate reasons. Here we only have the prosecution laying out their case and leaving it to a highly left leaning media and the general public to make their own conclusions. In the case of obstruction was Trump trying to break the law or simply foolishly trying to protect himself and intent is very difficult to prove. My guess is it’s somewhere in the middle but we really don’t know.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There seems to be a lot of confusion on how this works:
Mueller was the Special Counsel that created a document titled:
Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election
Congress is not a court, but thanks to our system of checks and balances, has the constitutional authority to demand any and all records pertaining to this report. At this time, the tattered remains of our Executive Branch are suing anyone and everyone, including international banks, to prevent the truth from being found.
This isn't a problem for you?
As we have a standing precedent since watergate, that report was made entirely unredacted to the public upon release, and all Presidents have disclosed their personal tax information to ensure transparency in that they have no business dealings that create a conflict of interest in that President's proposed legislation - Jimmy Carter had to give up his peanut farm as you may recall.
Yet Trump has potential conflicts of interest in more than
THIRTY COUNTRIES :
"Don't forget:
the Trump Foundationand
Trump University have already shuttered amid allegations of fraud. The Trump Organization, the Trump campaign, and
the Trump inaugural committee are all under investigation by various state and federal prosecutors"
Yet despite all of this information that can be verified across any number of platforms, you completely ignore it and go right back to making unsubstantiated claims about Hillary Clinton - despite the fact that she was already investigated 8 times with zero indictments. Yet, here we have a sitting President who disavows our own intelligence, and stated "He believe Putin didn't do it." When there are literally dozens of indictments of Russian citizens or businesses.
Then there is trying to create a narrative to why Obama, then President, wanted to be kept informed about the actual witch hunt that produced zero charges and nothing more than, Hillary used an unsecure server. Yet you do not care that Trump's people still use private phones, or continue to conduct business at his properties? There have been reports on this since his inauguration, here's
one just as a reminder.
@herbu @markw @KirkJBL590 @DaleDoback
Notice how I provided citations for my claims, without once disparaging the person I am discussing things with? Please follow this precedent, lest we need to have some more time-outs!
