I do like the option of the yamaha. The reviews all look good from what i have read. I see that it was released in 2012. Now i'm obviously not way into the audio screen as much as most people here but are some of these new receivers maybe as good? How has the technology of sounds quality changed in the last 2 years? I honestly don't care about all the wireless features. I am just looking for a great sounding receiver. I've been happy with the Onkyo nr808 that i'm replacing all except it died on me and I don't have sounds going through it anymore.
Maybe i'm a little naive but i kinda look at newer is better. Help school me on this so i can understand better.
Here you can do a comparison with it and the current model that replaced it:
Comparison Chart:RX-A1030,RX-A1020 - AVENTAGE - Audio & Visual - Products - Yamaha United States
You can also look at the pages for them individually:
RX-A1030 - AVENTAGE - Audio & Visual - Products - Yamaha United States
RX-A1020 - AVENTAGE - Audio & Visual - Products - Yamaha United States
There are very few differences between them. From a sound standpoint, you are unlikely to hear any difference at all. The new one adds MHL support, and a couple of other features that there is a good chance you will never need, but you should look for yourself. Keep in mind, you are not going to get the new model at the discounted price. At least, not until it is no longer a new model and something else has replaced it. So if you are looking for a $700 receiver, you would have to compare with a lower model, not the RX-A1030. And then, in my opinion, there will be no comparison. If you want to pay only $700, no other Yamaha is as good as the RX-A1020. And I personally don't think the new one is enough better to justify the difference in price, particularly when the newer features are such that many people will not use them anyway. I certainly don't need any of the new features.
To more directly answer your question, the audio quality of receivers has not changed in the last 2 years, at least not if one bypasses all special processing. The basic performance is the same.
And I also don't think that an extra $300 will get you much more. I would go with the RX-A1020 if I had your budget and would not bother with anything more expensive. Now, if you wanted to spend $1500, then it would be another matter, though most likely, it would not be worthwhile to spend any more at all.