Huh?
Too much to pay for the most capable Blu Ray player on the market? It's also the cheapest. What is "too little" about it? For the cash, everything else pales in comparison.
I wanted a stand alone too, but they all suck compared to the capabilities of the PS3.
Pat
.
I already stated that it is the best player currently available.
Keeping the gaming aspect out of the equation:
It's a dvd player! A four hundred dollar DVD player! And yes, the cheapest one. Tell me there is not something wrong with that picture. The only reason Sony is charging $400 for it and Pioneer, Samsung etc are charging more for stand-alone units is because they can.
My advice was to wait the game out.
My prediction : no doubt the PS3 will remain at it's current price. And arguably, given the gaming capabilities, it deservedly should. But by Christmas, don't be surprised to see a more capable player aroud the $200 mark.