You can't turn crap into a pigs ear.......or something
mtrycrafts said:
Uhm, let's not go there as that is not the case at all. 44.1 is at or near the threshold of detection while 480i or 480p is far from it.
Shhhhhhhh...
Don't be such a spoiler Mtry. You'll ruin my campaign of mis-information. I want everyone confused and thinking they can upsample and or upscale a crap source and end up with audio video nirvana. That way I'll never get some ACTUAL HD video and sound.
They might realise that ANY audio or video source can't get any better than how it was sampled from the real world.
If I get a casette tape, of a tape, of a tape, of a tape dubbed between boomboxes of a Greatful Dead show, digitize it at 192khz 24bit, play it back on bees knees DVD-A player of the day do I end up with a high resolution reproduction of what it's like to be at the show?
Can I take a 100x100 pixel video clip "upscale" it in the cat's a$s processor du jour to 1920x1080 and call it high definition? That's making up alot of dots. The goblins are gonna cramp up working so hard.
Next time I'll try to use lots of smileys and arrows to make the sillyness clear.
I wonder how that thread debating witch reciever that guy should buy is going...