At the 11.00 listening level the rx-v1000 was 55 watts
Same with the rx-v2095 sat at 55 watts witch was at about 10.30 on the dial
The
Then we did the load as well as what performance I was getting from the recievers witch was verey deseving you'll have to do your own testing to get your own results! I performand my testing and got my results of course I do what do you think I'm stupied or something?
The bench testing Equiment I'm unsure of the brand but it's a few years older then me I got it from my pop witch is a sound performance speshlest
As my momma always told me, stupid as stupid does
Anyways, your "results" don't actually tell us a whole lot. You haven't given any real metrics that you were judging each receiver by except for "punch" and that "they don't make stuff like they used to".
First of all, I wouldn't compare an HTIB receiver to a "real" one unless I had good reason to. I don't, but you apparently did. Then you came on to this forum and made a claim. I merely tried to ascertain what led you to this conclusion. All I've garnered from your answers are that both receivers were outputting about the same wattages at arbitrary positions. There is still no actual information to A) support your claim or B) tell us how exactly you determined the "real" receiver was better than the HTIB one except that one had more "punch" which is purely subjective. At this point I have no idea if the "real" receiver is actually better than the HTIB receiver, but based on your wattage measurements and the arbitrary positions of the volume dials it appears they use a similar volume scale. So in a comparison between the two we have a little information. As to your actual claim we have more or less zero information.
All we're asking if that you provide something to support a claim you made. Hey man, you started this discussion, don't get sore at me for asking questions when you don't provide any real information about what you did or that supports what you say. I'm just curious since you brought it up.
