The Dawg Crusher Killer

ParadigmDawg

ParadigmDawg

Audioholic Overlord
I agree, all I did was watch the woofer.

I asked Andrew about filling the space with Mineral wool and he said it probably wouldn't do much. I have a bunch so I may just try it.
Different designs. The crazy excursion is just how it works with this unit. The shotgun scene is a pretty good one, I've had a few people (women) become visibly startled by my single F113. When I first got this sub years ago, it was fun to watch the excursion, to the point where you're just looking at the driver instead of the movie. I recommend leaving the grille on so that you can just enjoy the movie. ;)

Oh regarding the center speaker, and if you really care enough (which you may or may not), it could* be worth asking about filling up that space with acoustical material, all around the speaker itself. Then maybe just cover it up with AT fabric.
 
WmAx

WmAx

Audioholic Samurai
The greater excursion is (1) a smaller diameter woofer [and] (2) an under-sized sealed cabinet, requiring extra EQ to hit the lowest octave. The DawgCrusher had an optimal size cabinet(not undersized) and more surface area, so it had to work less to produce the same SPL at the bottom octave.

-Chris
 
ParadigmDawg

ParadigmDawg

Audioholic Overlord
I see what you are saying but the Dawg Crusher's cabinet wasn't quite optimal since it was so front heavy that the back of it became unweighted when the driver would push out causing the sub to walk and rattle.

( Don't worry guys, I told oppman99 about this before hand and this is the reason the cab was free and the charges were for the rest of the gear)
The greater excursion is (1) a smaller diameter woofer [and] (2) an under-sized sealed cabinet, requiring extra EQ to hit the lowest octave. The DawgCrusher had an optimal size cabinet(not undersized) and more surface area, so it had to work less to produce the same SPL at the bottom octave.

-Chris
 
Warpdrv

Warpdrv

Audioholic Ninja
I see what you are saying but the Dawg Crusher's cabinet wasn't quite optimal since it was so front heavy that the back of it became unweighted when the driver would push out causing the sub to walk and rattle.

( Don't worry guys, I told oppman99 about this before hand and this is the reason the cab was free and the charges were for the rest of the gear)
He is talking about the internal size of the cabinet for the driver to perform in

Not about weight to counteract the drivers movement...
 
O

oppman99

Senior Audioholic
( Don't worry guys, I told oppman99 about this before hand and this is the reason the cab was free and the charges were for the rest of the gear)
No worries. I have the Dawg Crusher sitting on carpet, so it hasn't walked around yet. Haven't had time to go to obscene volumes yet, just watched a few good action flicks.

Glad you're liking the JL. I don't see mine going anywhere for many years...or until I win the lottery and have unlimited funds. :D
 
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Warlord
No worries. I have the Dawg Crusher sitting on carpet, so it hasn't walked around yet. Haven't had time to go to obscene volumes yet, just watched a few good action flicks.

Glad you're liking the JL. I don't see mine going anywhere for many years...or until I win the lottery and have unlimited funds. :D
You know, you could consider installing some steel plate on the back to counter the weight of the driver on the front. Just a thought...
 
ParadigmDawg

ParadigmDawg

Audioholic Overlord
Well, after living with this sub for 3 days and extensive listening, I can say that I am very impressed. This sub enhances my system in a way no other ever has. Each low passage burst into my listening room as a well defined thud with clean, defined and sudden, explosive power.

I have now moved my ranking of this sub on top; with the Dawg Crusher coming in second and the Servo15 in 3rd. My old SVS stays at #4 as it wasn't nearly as musical as these sealed subs.

I would be interested to see what the Dawg Crusher would've done in a properly weighted box and fed enough power as I think the driver itself was a little better than the JL.

Oppman, take the Dawg Crusher to the next level for us.

Man, I am getting itchy thinking about the second one.

In case you are wondering what that crazy dawg is gonna do next...I am thinking about trying to find some Paradigm Signature S4 and place them on top of the Subs to free up a little floor space. Since they quit making them, I may have trouble finding them in Piano Gloss. What B&W would be a good replacement?
 
Last edited:
GlocksRock

GlocksRock

Audioholic Spartan
what SVS was it that you used to have? I know S&V magazine ranked the new PB12 plus over the JL F112, it makes me wonder how the PB13-Ultra compares to the JL F113.
 
ParadigmDawg

ParadigmDawg

Audioholic Overlord
Don't remember the model, it was the one with 2-12" drivers.

I would guess that the SVS has more output and the F113 is more accurate.
what SVS was it that you used to have? I know S&V magazine ranked the new PB12 plus over the JL F112, it makes me wonder how the PB13-Ultra compares to the JL F113.
 
GlocksRock

GlocksRock

Audioholic Spartan
possibly, they said the svs was better in pretty much every category, and cost less than half of what the JL cost. I've never heard a JL sub that wasn't car audio, so I don't know how they sound, although I'm sure they sound great. But I do know that when I got my 20-39PC+ it was the best sub I had ever heard, that is until I got my ultra 13 and I can't believe how good it sounds. If there is something better sounding out there, and I'm sure there is, I want to hear it.
 
J

jostenmeat

Audioholic Spartan
possibly, they said the svs was better in pretty much every category, and cost less than half of what the JL cost. I've never heard a JL sub that wasn't car audio, so I don't know how they sound, although I'm sure they sound great. But I do know that when I got my 20-39PC+ it was the best sub I had ever heard, that is until I got my ultra 13 and I can't believe how good it sounds. If there is something better sounding out there, and I'm sure there is, I want to hear it.
Most anyone who has ever heard the JL do enjoy both its SQ and aesthetics. The F113 is 50% of the volume of the PB13, and has an amazing finish. The SVS should get you more output, and for a bit less money. Don't tell me it's $4,000 or whatever, because that is nowhere near what Dawg or I paid or any AV forum member pays. Think like half.

While rmk isn't the only one who has listened to both, he did a lil write up of a GTG with dual F113s on top of dual PB13s. Per usual, JL wins a bit with SQ 'n finish, and the PB13s wins a bit with output.

http://forums.audioholics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=341658&postcount=40




I have to admit the Dawg's favorable impressions has me second guessing the Danley on the brain. Do I order this now? I've got like two days left . . .

About $700 less than a PB13, and maybe 4x the output, and leaves just about anything except a rotary sub in the dust as far as extension. (11hz ground plane.)

 
lsiberian

lsiberian

Audioholic Overlord
Most anyone who has ever heard the JL do enjoy both its SQ and aesthetics. The F113 is 50% of the volume of the PB13, and has an amazing finish. The SVS should get you more output, and for a bit less money. Don't tell me it's $4,000 or whatever, because that is nowhere near what Dawg or I paid or any AV forum member pays. Think like half.

While rmk isn't the only one who has listened to both, he did a lil write up of a GTG with dual F113s on top of dual PB13s. Per usual, JL wins a bit with SQ 'n finish, and the PB13s wins a bit with output.

http://forums.audioholics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=341658&postcount=40




I have to admit the Dawg's favorable impressions has me second guessing the Danley on the brain. Do I order this now? I've got like two days left . . .

About $700 less than a PB13, and maybe 4x the output, and leaves just about anything except a rotary sub in the dust as far as extension. (11hz ground plane.)

I'd get the JL Audio subs. It's a lot less work and the craftsmanship is just magnificent.
 
GlocksRock

GlocksRock

Audioholic Spartan
can I ask where you got such a great price on the JL? PM me if neccesary. I'd love to have a sub the size of the JL, but my room is big enough to accomodate the ultra, so it's not that big of a deal to me, but it is very heavy and not fun to move. I've never seen the JL subs in person, and while the fit and finish may be better than the SVS, the piano black ultra has a fantastic fit and finish as well. But if I had the money, I'd definitley get a gotham, or even one of the new JL F212 subs.
 
J

jostenmeat

Audioholic Spartan
can I ask where you got such a great price on the JL? PM me if neccesary. I'd love to have a sub the size of the JL, but my room is big enough to accomodate the ultra, so it's not that big of a deal to me, but it is very heavy and not fun to move.
PD can tell you by PM. I paid more than he did, but that was three years ago (before the PB13 even existed), from a store in TX, 2.5k shipped. I think it's called Audio Video, and I believe it's in College Station.
 
Warpdrv

Warpdrv

Audioholic Ninja
Well, after living with this sub for 3 days and extensive listening, I can say that I am very impressed. This sub enhances my system in a way no other ever has. Each low passage burst into my listening room as a well defined thud with clean, defined and sudden, explosive power.

I have now moved my ranking of this sub on top; with the Dawg Crusher coming in second and the Servo15 in 3rd. My old SVS stays at #4 as it wasn't nearly as musical as these sealed subs.

I would be interested to see what the Dawg Crusher would've done in a properly weighted box and fed enough power as I think the driver itself was a little better than the JL.

Oppman, take the Dawg Crusher to the next level for us.

Man, I am getting itchy thinking about the second one.

In case you are wondering what that crazy dawg is gonna do next...I am thinking about trying to find some Paradigm Signature S4 and place them on top of the Subs to free up a little floor space. Since they quit making them, I may have trouble finding them in Piano Gloss. What B&W would be a good replacement?
You really need to EQ that sub - you may be experiencing some boomyness which could lead you to believe that the F113 is more powerful then the TC3000 that was EQ'd.
The auto calibration is only a single band of EQ, not the whole range... If your planning on having the subs flanking your console like it looks you will do, you may be able to get away with EQing with an SMS-1....

Just an fyi, the Fathom line of subs will shake quite a bit. I have a lamp on my F112 and when it gets into some powerful scenes or heavy bass music that lamp will vibrate off the sub and fall if I don't remove it first...

So I would advise against placing any speaker on top of it.
 
ParadigmDawg

ParadigmDawg

Audioholic Overlord
I am pretty certain I can tell the difference between tight bass and accurate bass:D

Hey, isn't a 80lb speaker heavier than a 1lb lamp?
You really need to EQ that sub - you may be experiencing some boomyness which could lead you to believe that the F113 is more powerful then the TC3000 that was EQ'd.
The auto calibration is only a single band of EQ, not the whole range... If your planning on having the subs flanking your console like it looks you will do, you may be able to get away with EQing with an SMS-1....

Just an fyi, the Fathom line of subs will shake quite a bit. I have a lamp on my F112 and when it gets into some powerful scenes or heavy bass music that lamp will vibrate off the sub and fall if I don't remove it first...

So I would advise against placing any speaker on top of it.
 
Warpdrv

Warpdrv

Audioholic Ninja
I am pretty certain I can tell the difference between tight bass and accurate bass:D

Hey, isn't a 80lb speaker heavier than a 1lb lamp?
I'm just sayin - show me your eq measurments and I'll buy it...

You do what you want with your speaker, but I also have some heavy stuff sitting on my LMS boxes and they don't stay put either....

I would suggest just going with the S6's if you can find some...
 
lsiberian

lsiberian

Audioholic Overlord
I'm just sayin - show me your eq measurments and I'll buy it...

You do what you want with your speaker, but I also have some heavy stuff sitting on my LMS boxes and they don't stay put either....

I would suggest just going with the S6's if you can find some...
roofing felt could be used to reduce vibrations.

Lining your lamps with roofing felt might keep them from vibrating :D
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top