Bevan said:
dkordonowy, let us know how it goes. i'm also looking at the ML dynamo/grotto or velodyne spl-800 or rel stampede.
i'm wondering if 2x dynamo would be better than 1x grotto.(music is my interest).
please report back
cheers
b.
Hey all, just a quick followup. I listened to the dynamo and grotto at tweeter. Not the best listening setup they had (the dynamo was set to much louder than the grotto) but even after toning it down it was obvious that the grotto sounded *much* cleaner than the dynamo. Actually, I was suprised at how bad the dynamo sounded. It could have been just the setup, but I moved on.
Next I went and auditioned a REL Quake, which I listened to at a great shop which sells Thiels so I could see how it blended with my mains. Of course telling the store owner I had just come from auditioning some martin logans I got the usual reply ("they don't even know how to make speakers yet"). However, I must say that the Quake was so small and did such a great job, blending in perfectly with the mains and not once faultering. The thing is tiny! Definetely got the most "wife" votes (I think she gets more votes than I do), and the sound was even "tighter" at louder volumes than the Grotto. Keep in mind though, the room was well acoustically treated.
So now I'm back home, poring over the differences between the Force and Quake. That ACI seems to see REL as their direct competitor, based on the comparison charts makes me think that they will sound similar in person. That the specs on the Force are so much more impressive than the specs on the Quake make me think the Force is better on paper. And that I liked the Quake so much makes me think I'll like the Force too.
I guess in conclusion I am going to try the Force. If it isn't what I like, I'll bring a REL Quake home and do a direct comparison.
NB: I did all listening to music only, as movies aren't as important to me.
NB2: Bevan, I'd definetely go single dynamo but go listen to a Quake too, because it's better and smaller as far as I can tell.