The idea of IPTV is a lot easier said than done right now. It is extremely confusing to consumers because there is nothing approaching a 'unified' IPTV streaming system in place that I have heard of. Then, the cost associated with something like that could easily match that of cable providers systems. The issue is that many of the channels out there charge cable companies for what they deliver, and those fees then are passed back to consumers. As their costs go up, your costs go up. But, IPTV would really be no different. Those charges would still be something that would be passed on to consumers. Now, Netflix and Amazon certainly offer previous seasons of shows, but current episodes of shows, especially off-beat shows, can be hard to come by. Hulu+ is a great way to get more popular stuff there, but from 150+ channels? Not even close from them. Then, of course, there is sports. Live, real time, HD sports... The best delivery method still remains cable if that's important. Frankly, I've never understood why people would pull away from the simple delivery system that cable offers. Yes, some channels are overly compressed, but if you find that form of entertainment enjoyable, then the fees paid are quite often worth the cost. Still, worth price shopping against DirecTV, Dish, and whoever else may be able to provide you services.