Problems With Liberal Democracy

R

rnatalli

Audioholic Ninja
I think the biggest fear many have is Mamdani’s policies will work. I’m not so sure, but will keep an open mind.
 
William Lemmerhirt

William Lemmerhirt

Audioholic Overlord
I think he’s out of his mind, and can’t believe he got any votes at all. He should also be removed from office for the list of people he doxxed alone. It has to be criminal.
 
mtrycrafts

mtrycrafts

Seriously, I have no life.
I think he’s out of his mind, and can’t believe he got any votes at all. He should also be removed from office for the list of people he doxxed alone. It has to be criminal.
You mean he personally doxed a bunch?
Or,


"AI Overview



New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani's administration released a public, searchable database of property owners potentially subject to the state's new pied-à-terre tax on secondary luxury homes. While critics and figures like podcaster Scott Galloway accused the administration of "doxxing" wealthy homeowners by publishing names and addresses, City Hall stated that publishing property rolls is standard practice required under city law. "
 
William Lemmerhirt

William Lemmerhirt

Audioholic Overlord
You mean he personally doxed a bunch?
Or,


"AI Overview



New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani's administration released a public, searchable database of property owners potentially subject to the state's new pied-à-terre tax on secondary luxury homes. While critics and figures like podcaster Scott Galloway accused the administration of "doxxing" wealthy homeowners by publishing names and addresses, City Hall stated that publishing property rolls is standard practice required under city law. "
The data isn’t necessarily new, but the searchable database is, and imo certainly careless at the very least, and very potentially dangerous.
It’s also a ridiculous tax.
Are you saying that this database is the right thing to do?
 
mtrycrafts

mtrycrafts

Seriously, I have no life.
The data isn’t necessarily new, but the searchable database is, and imo certainly careless at the very least, and very potentially dangerous.
It’s also a ridiculous tax.
Are you saying that this database is the right thing to do?
No idea.
So, he didn't dox anyone, right?
I am pretty sure one can drive around in upper class neighborhoods, get an address and call the county recorder, who lives there. Not a secret.
That is how companies get names and correct addresses to send you junk or whatever by your name.

Don't need such a list to dox someone. ;)
 
jinjuku

jinjuku

Moderator
Walked back, or was never going to be a requirement? The only statement from Mamdani that I can find is one saying that ID would not be required. I'm on the fence as to the efficacy of this scheme. The idea is not unprecedented, so time will tell.

And, while Mamdani may oppose voter ID requirements, the vast majority of the "liberal side of the curve" are not opposed - they just want it to be fair.
There is a press conference with Mamdani where the question was asked about customer vetting. Mamdani stepped back from the podium to let someone from his administration answer you will need some form of ID.

Saw this on 'Nate the Lawyer' Y/T channel.

So they are indeed walking it back.
 
Last edited:
R

rnatalli

Audioholic Ninja
What I really don't like about today is you basically have two choices in the U.S. Either communism under the democrats or fascism under the republicans. Choose your poison.
 
H

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
The data isn’t necessarily new, but the searchable database is, and imo certainly careless at the very least, and very potentially dangerous.
It’s also a ridiculous tax.
Are you saying that this database is the right thing to do?
Not sure it's new- county GIS databases have been public for many years and they often show more info than a city database.

Property ownership has been public info for a long time- before the internet, accessing it required going to the register of deeds-now, its just a matter of knowing specific addresses or a range of them on a street.

Now, was it appropriate for Mamdani to publicize it, himself? I don't think so. What was his purpose, if not to shame or make the property owners into targets- GIS usually shows the owner's residential address, too.
 
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Warlord
There is a press conference with Mamdani where the question was asked about customer vetting. Mamdani stepped back from the podium to let someone from his administration answer you will need some form of ID.

Saw this on 'Nate the Lawyer' Y/T channel.

So they are indeed walking it back.
If Mamdani let someone else answer the question, could it mean he didn't even know that this was the intended policy?
 
jinjuku

jinjuku

Moderator
If Mamdani let someone else answer the question, could it mean he didn't even know that this was the intended policy?
Mamdani is the mayor of NYC. Are you meaning to insinuate that his cabinet and policy shapers act without his approval?

He was asked a direct question about residency wrt to the municipal grocery stores and tee'd it off to his expert that he presumably put in charge to give an answer on that.

He both understood the question and whom could immediately answer it and the very first sentence was 'an id' mechanism.
 
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Warlord
What I really don't like about today is you basically have two choices in the U.S. Either communism under the democrats or fascism under the republicans. Choose your poison.
I noticed a surge coming from the Democrats left wing, but lets not pretend they all sing from the same song sheet. Trying to get the Democrats to go in one direction is like herding cats. Regardless, until they add abolition of private property and nationalising all private industry to their platform, I wouldn't worry too much about them becoming commies in sheep's clothing.
 
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Warlord
Mamdani is the mayor of NYC. Are you meaning to insinuate that his cabinet and policy shapers act without his approval?

He was asked a direct question about residency wrt to the municipal grocery stores and tee'd it off to his expert that he presumably put in charge to give an answer on that.

He both understood the question and whom could immediately answer it and the very first sentence was 'an id' mechanism.
I'm just asking a question. I would expect that being the mayor of NYC involves juggling more issues than the governors of some states. So, if he didn't know every single detail of a program, I wouldn't be shocked.

I'm not defending him, just playing devils advocate. If he was caught out in a moment of hypocrisy, so be it. If he didn't know about it, maybe he should have, but it wouldn't be an earth-shattering revelation if he didn't. Politicians at that level have to delegate a great deal of responsibility and can't micromanage their people.

Like I said earlier, I'm not even sure that this sort of program is good idea in the first place.

I should acknowledge that your posting about Mamdani's apparent hypocrisy in this particular thread is appropriate, as it does point to a problem with liberal democracy - inconsistency and hypocrisy. It's a problem that totalitarian governments don't worry too much about, since such shortcomings are far less likely to be called out by the press, or common folk.
 
Last edited:
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top