D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
Now how the hell can AOC win the presidency with this kind of thinking in NY??? I was hoping for a more moderate. Maybe Buttigieg could fit the bill, but he's probably too smart to run for president. I think Newsom might make the nom.
1751097195566.png

Mamdani may join global trend of mayors standing up to nationalists...
Proposes Taxing 'Whiter Neighborhoods' in NYC...
How $29 sandwiches pushed city to socialism...
Millionaires planning to escape...
Can Energetic Campaign Be Blueprint for Dems?


Yeah see it's 4T over 10 years, not 4T in 4 years like I dunno Biden would do. You're answer can't be to spend MORE and think that's gonna work. I can't stand Trump & the Republicans, but give the man a little credit for not racking it up by the end of his term.
'$4,000,000,000,000.00 MORE DEBT'
 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
Yeah see it's 4T over 10 years, not 4T in 4 years like I dunno Biden would do. You're answer can't be to spend MORE and think that's gonna work. I can't stand Trump & the Republicans, but give the man a little credit for not racking it up by the end of his term.
'$4,000,000,000,000.00 MORE DEBT'
It's not quite that simple and is for a ten year period as well for Biden's presidency.

Do note that Trump's "The Big Beautiful Bill" adds greatly to the deficits by given tax cuts to the very rich, while trying to reduce it by savagely cutting Medicaid/Medicare, SNAPS and so forth that the poor depends on (which includes many Trump voters).

Biden did not do so as he actually cared about Americans.

From https://www.crfb.org/blogs/how-much-did-president-biden-add-debt below:

>>>The $4.7 trillion in net new ten-year debt approved by President Biden includes $6.6 trillion of deficit-increasing actions and $1.9 trillion of deficit-reducing actions. Excluding the $2.1 trillion from the American Rescue Plan (ARP), which was enacted in March 2021 to further provide broad economic relief during the COVID-19 pandemic, President Biden approved $4.5 trillion of new gross ten-year debt and over $2.6 trillion in new net ten-year debt. <<<

1751105187765.png


From https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/the-coming-health-care-apocalypse there is also this how much Trump and Republicans care about Americans when trying to finance the tax cuts for the very rich:

1751106288991.png


1751106411552.png
 
Last edited:
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
"LMAO! CNN's Dana Bash's talking point immediately SMACKED DOWN by Scott Bessent. She was not ready for this. BASH: "The Yale Budget Lab says the richest Americans will see their income rise by nearly 2%. The lowest earning Americans will see their income drop by 3%..." BESSENT: "The Yale Budget Lab...they're all ex-Biden officials, so I think we can discount everything they say. I'd encourage all your viewers to look at the composition of both the board and the staff." "

The taxes on the rich actually go up - permanently. Listen to Scott Bessent tell you the truth, if you can handle it.
Is this what amounts to a "rebuttal" from MAGA dudes?

Scott Bessent knows that he is bullsh*tting, but he also knows that the MAGA base consists of really dumb people embracing ignorance, anti-science, bigotry and misogyny. So they will believe his BS and use it as an "argument" to "rebut".
 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
It comes as a refutation of the BS from CNN and Dana Bash. Smart Americans are no longer listening to legacy media BS, nor the frothed rants of foreign interference.
You don't mind Russian influence, apparently.

Knowing you are not an American citizen, I have this message for you - America will no longer be a host for the parasites of the world. The Marshall Plan is finally dead. It should have died 50 years ago. It's time for you to stand on your own feet, or feed off of someone else.
So now you're going for "parasites" in USA, like coloured people or non-Christians, and should they happen to be US citizens you'll try to take their citizenship away. Dehumanising people like you do is a common step before the end goal of "extermination" or a "final solution".

Jews around the world have seen this before and knows what very well could happen again, but this time in USA. So a number of Jews are, reportedly, planning to leave USA or be prepared to very quickly leave.

We've seen your type before and what atrocities you're capable of.
 
H

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
You don't mind Russian influence, apparently.



So now you're going for "parasites" in USA, like coloured people or non-Christians, and should they happen to be US citizens you'll try to take their citizenship away. Dehumanising people like you do is a common step before the end goal of "extermination" or a "final solution".

Jews around the world have seen this before and knows what very well could happen again, but this time in USA. So a number of Jews are, reportedly, planning to leave USA or be prepared to very quickly leave.

We've seen your type before and what atrocities you're capable of.
I don't now where you're getting your info, but at ~69% Christian, it's not likely that being Christian is a qualification for allowing people to stay. Religion/religious affiliation is declining and has been, for decades. There's no movement to eliminate any religious groups, but among the idiots out there, hatred for Jews seems to be growing, as it has seemed in other countries.

WRT removing 'coloured' people, that's not the point, but you want it to be. It's also not about removing people from Mexico- the goal is to remove deportees who are criminals, which is why 'Alligator Alcatraz' was built (it's a place to hold the criminals, not the masses who have been trying to enter). It's also not just for Mexicans- look into the number of entrants from China, Africa, South America, Eastern Europe and Middle Eastern countries.

FWIW- the US stopped using 'colored' a long time ago- it had a specific definition at the time, but now, it would cover any non-white person. You might try being more specific, if your point is to be taken seriously and argued against.

The US has plenty of parasites, but unfortunately, the majority are actually Americans, of all kinds and many are White.

BTW- the link includes "Quotas and caps are used to control population growth and make sure that the nation’s resources are not taxed beyond capacity. To strike a balance between the country’s demand for migration and the need to preserve social cohesion and economic stability, the Norwegian government implements quotas and limitations.".

So, Norway can do it but the US can't? Try to justify that. Smaller country/population, lower tolerance- I get that but the US needs to limit who enters for the same reasons as other countries.

 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
I don't now where you're getting your info, but at ~69% Christian, it's not likely that being Christian is a qualification for allowing people to stay. Religion/religious affiliation is declining and has been, for decades. There's no movement to eliminate any religious groups, but among the idiots out there, hatred for Jews seems to be growing, as it has seemed in other countries.

WRT removing 'coloured' people, that's not the point, but you want it to be. It's also not about removing people from Mexico- the goal is to remove deportees who are criminals, which is why 'Alligator Alcatraz' was built (it's a place to hold the criminals, not the masses who have been trying to enter). It's also not just for Mexicans- look into the number of entrants from China, Africa, South America, Eastern Europe and Middle Eastern countries.

FWIW- the US stopped using 'colored' a long time ago- it had a specific definition at the time, but now, it would cover any non-white person. You might try being more specific, if your point is to be taken seriously and argued against.

The US has plenty of parasites, but unfortunately, the majority are actually Americans, of all kinds and many are White.

BTW- the link includes "Quotas and caps are used to control population growth and make sure that the nation’s resources are not taxed beyond capacity. To strike a balance between the country’s demand for migration and the need to preserve social cohesion and economic stability, the Norwegian government implements quotas and limitations.".

So, Norway can do it but the US can't? Try to justify that. Smaller country/population, lower tolerance- I get that but the US needs to limit who enters for the same reasons as other countries.

Yet again you are totally missing the point: It's not about immigration, illegal or otherwise.

You could try read a little, a tall order, but in this thread the context it's about the incel writing "Knowing you are not an American citizen, I have this message for you - America will no longer be a host for the parasites of the world." And do read his posts in my 4th July thread for further context.
 
Last edited:
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
[Removed MAGA derp]
Don't pass go. Don't collect $200. Just pay me an additional 10%. I don't care what 'colour' or religion you are. Just pay me; especially if you are as thick as a BRICS.
What a moronic belief that other countries are paying for the Trump tariffs, but then MAGA dudes are really dumb.
 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
You Still need a cookie? SMH.

Go here and see 16 countries who will be paying, letters sent today:

17..18..19..... more to come... You ought to try keeping up with current events.
Good grief.

A tariff is a sales tax on imports. Who do you think ends up paying that?

And what happened to the "90 deals in 90 days" that TACO promised?
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Warlord
"LMAO! CNN's Dana Bash's talking point immediately SMACKED DOWN by Scott Bessent. She was not ready for this. BASH: "The Yale Budget Lab says the richest Americans will see their income rise by nearly 2%. The lowest earning Americans will see their income drop by 3%..." BESSENT: "The Yale Budget Lab...they're all ex-Biden officials, so I think we can discount everything they say. I'd encourage all your viewers to look at the composition of both the board and the staff." "

The taxes on the rich actually go up - permanently. Listen to Scott Bessent tell you the truth, if you can handle it.
Bessent doesn't actually tell you why the figures are wrong there. He just says they are. Since he's a Trump devotee, I'd be skeptical of what he says.
 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
Bessent doesn't actually tell you why the figures are wrong there. He just says they are. Since he's a Trump devotee, I'd be skeptical of what he says.
So will any person with some critical thinking skills, but here your replying to a MAGA dude that does not even understand that a tariff is essentially a sales tax on imports and not paid by the exporting countries. But hey, Trump says so and thus true! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
H

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
So will any person with some critical thinking skills, but here your replying to a MAGA dude that does not even understand that a tariff is essentially a sales tax on imports and not paid by the exporting countries. But hey, Trump says so and thus true! :rolleyes:
What are you trying to accomplish by coming here and ragging on this country? Do you actually exoect to cause changes, or does it make you feel good to see your words online?

Why don't you look at the countries people are leaving in hopes of a better life and try to change them? You may have heard T-bag call them 'sh!tholes and that's exactly what they are.
 
D

David_Alexander

Junior Audioholic
Pattern Repeats – Imported Durable Goods Creating Deflation on U.S Consumer Prices

"The Term-1 effect of deflation created by tariff policy is resurfacing in Term-2 even with larger tariff impacts across the network of global manufacturing exports. [DATA SOURCE]

In essence, there is little to no end result in price increases in the final price of consumer goods (Consumer Price Index). In fact, there is a slight deflationary aspect on CPI data from imported durable goods. The lower price of arriving imported durable goods is effectively putting downward pressure on US consumer prices. This is identical to the Term-1 result. A pattern is repeating. [PCE personal consumption expenditure / CPI consumer price index]

It sounds counterintuitive, but tariffs do not impact the final price of goods to USA consumers; there are just too many factors, too many elements within the Total Cost of Goods (TCG) within supply chain. Global energy prices, domestic energy prices, currency evaluations and fluctuations, state/govt subsidies to manufacturers, labor negotiations and production profit offsets are only a few of the components.

Additionally, and this is where U.S. consumers do not get a fulsome explanation from corporate media analysts, the tariff rate is applied to the ‘cost’ the exporter pays, not the final consumer price. A pair of jeans from China may be sold to the import company for $5 per pair. A 30% tariff raises the price of the jeans by $1.50 to $6.50. The tariff rate does not apply to the retail price of $50 paid by the consumer."

Much more at the article, with embedded sources...
Looks like Whitehouse propaganda to me.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top