Photography related discussions

Warpdrv

Warpdrv

Audioholic Ninja
Warpdrv,



:eek:

Remember to back up your files. Your RAW (NEF, really) files are essentially digital negatives. Once lost...



I have no experience with Speedlights so hopefully others will chime in.

My server is a full RAID 6 array, so not a huge worry about lost files, but I agree - I have multiple backup sources, external HD's included throughout my network...
 
BoredSysAdmin

BoredSysAdmin

Audioholic Slumlord
I'm not a pro, but Imo Sb-800 would be good for wedding/people photographer. Also it's would be good in studio work as 800 is only model with includes wireless flash sync (if you have multiple flashes)
This is where I think Ken R is right , the only feature you really need from flash is to be able to turn it up to bounce it (eg: from ceiling), and sb-200 is enough for this.
 
Warpdrv

Warpdrv

Audioholic Ninja
I'm not a pro, but Imo Sb-800 would be good for wedding/people photographer. Also it's would be good in studio work as 800 is only model with includes wireless flash sync (if you have multiple flashes)
This is where I think Ken R is right , the only feature you really need from flash is to be able to turn it up to bounce it (eg: from ceiling), and sb-200 is enough for this.

Ok, I won't dump the big bucks on a speed light, looks like the SB-200 isn't a shoe mount, so the SB-400 is probably more in line with what I'm looking for in the non-pro world I live in... :)

thanks
 
BoredSysAdmin

BoredSysAdmin

Audioholic Slumlord
mike c

mike c

Audioholic Warlord
don't scrimp on the speedlight. you need something that bounces (i doubt the small ones do that)

the SB600 (430EX equivalent of mine) would be the minimum i would recommend.
now that i've bought the bigger version, i regret not getting it in the first place (i scrimped and got the minimum the last time)

i don't need the extra power, but i did need the bigger flash because it could point backwards even in portrait mode (vertical).

better to have no filters than to have crappy filters ... skip tiffen. look for these:
B+W, Hoya Pro1D or Kenko Pro1D UV filters for protection. C-PL that Rob recommended for special usage. but honestly, wait awhile, no sense in buying protection if you're gonna be dumping the lens for something better anyway. those add up. :)
 
mike c

mike c

Audioholic Warlord
it will tilt upwards those degrees if the camera is in horizontal mode, once you go vertical for portraits, it will be aiming to the side.

go with the SB800 or SB900 (with 600 or 700 as minimum)

even the most expensive lens will bow to the kit lens + good lighting :)
 
N

NicolasKL

Full Audioholic
So I've had the Sony NEX-5 for a while, and unfortunately the weather and also work haven't been very cooperative, but I've used it enough now that I think I've got a pretty good feel for it, and I think this is a really great camera.

I've had a D80 for quite a while, that and the Nikkor 18-200 VR lens were my "high quality" camera, but when I go hiking or I'm at work it's just too much of a pain to lug around sometimes.

I've got a Samsung NV10 that I had previously bought as a camera that was pocketable but still somewhat decent quality. Then bought a Sony T100 thinking if I'm gonna have a small camera, let's get a REALLY small camera.

So I bought a Oly EPL-1. Good camera. Good pics. Fairly small and since the 18-42 is collapsible it's still fairly small with the zoom lens. But then the NEX-5 came out and wanted it bad, so I sold the Oly with 2 lenses (for $600, not too bad, really) and got the Sony.

And I LOVE the NEX. I was a little worried about losing the money on the Oly and then spending more money on the NEX, but I'm really glad I did.

The Oly is pretty small for what it is, but the NEX is significantly smaller, enough to be meaningful in some situations. The Oly was jacket pocketable but maybe only because I'm 6'5" and therefore my jacket pockets might be a little bigger than most peoples. The Sony with the 16mm prime should be jacket pocketable for everyone. The collapsible zoom on the Oly compared to the Sony with the kit zoom actually means the Oly is less deep when you compare the two with zoom lenses attached, but most of the time I'll probably have the camera with the pancake in one pocket and a zoom in another pocket, so the Sony works better (for me) in this regard.

Build quality is no contest. The Oly is plastic, and looks/feels like it. The Sony is a magnesium alloy, and looks/feels like it. The machined metal buttons, the "cylinder of metal" lenses, this camera just looks and feels high quality and sexy.

LCD is no contest. Olys in comparison is small and low rez (and cheap looking, really). The Sonys is large and hi rez, it wouldn't be possible to fit a larger one on the camera (unlike the oly where there's quite a bit of bare plastic around the LCD). And the Sonys tilts, both up and down. Ergonomically I think it's actually inferior to the tilting body of the Sony DSC-F717 (which I also owned), but I think doing something like that would make the camera significantly deeper. It's a nice thing to have, especially for me since a lot of the time I feel like I'm taking pics of the tops of peoples heads.

DPreview complained about the menus quite a bit. I wasn't too worried about it, because from what they said most of the things I use could still be accessed pretty quickly. It certainly isn't perfect, but it isn't terrible. The mostly commonly used things are easily accessed. And there's a firmware update (last I checked wasn't available yet, but may be now) that is supposed to make it better. It works okay, for me. There's a couple things that are a pain to access but not really a big deal. A few buttons are user programmable in PASM mode, so I think between that and what's already provided most people should be able to get to anything they need quickly. I didn't think the Olys menus were anything to write home about either, and I think the NEX combination scroll wheel/arrow buttons are far superior to the Olys lack of scroll wheel (only arrow buttons).

The Sony pops up explanations any time you linger on an icon for more than a second, which can be useful. It also has "tips" which aren't particularly useful for me but for some people I'm sure would be revelations (things like explaining apertures effect on DoF). There's like 100 or so "tips." These things make the Sony system seem really well polished. Like when you go to switch shoot mode, it pops up a picture of a mode wheel (like on an SLR) and then cycles through the options as you turn the (universal) scroll wheel. Just a whole lot cooler and more polished than hitting arrow keys on the Oly.

The only thing I HATE, HATE, HATE, is that if you go to select a function that isn't available in the mode you're in, it just tells you that it isn't available. I fiddled with the god damn thing for literally 15 minutes trying to figure out why I couldn't turn on HDR. Two issues. One, it pops up a screen saying that said function isn't available, how effing hard would it have been to instead of saying "That function is currently disabled" say "That function is not available in xxx mode" Second, I don't think it would be a bad idea to switch you to a mode that the function IS available in. If you're in auto and you try and change the exposure compensation, have the camera automatically switch to P. I think this has been mostly fixed with the firmware update. I think there have been two firmware updates (or there's been one and is about to be another one) because I have the first but not the second and it doesn't seem to be doing what it used to be doing, which was telling me (I think) I couldn't turn on HDR just because I had bracketing on (which is just plain dumb).

I don't think there's a big difference in pic quality. I remember when I first saw the NEX on DPR I thought the Oly actually took nicer pictures in some of the tests. The NEX has a larger higher rez sensor but overall I'd say they're pretty equal. They're both very good, it's just going to come down to lenses.

Video is better on the Sony. I think the Oly was 720p? Sony is 1080i and I think the video is quite good.

I wish the Sony had a hot shoe, but I don't think it's really thick enough for one and as long as they come out with an upgraded flash (which I'm pretty sure has been announced) that I can do indirect flash with, I'm totally happy.

Lack of built in flash in the Sony obviously isn't a plus, but the flash is actually pretty decent IMO and comes in a little plastic case that threads onto the camera strap, so not a big deal. Plus the Sony has really good low light performance (both very high ISO with pretty good noise reduction, and also a mode where it combines multiple exposures to eliminate shake).

In camera HDR and panoramas are great. I know it can be done outside the camera with the Oly, but it's still an enormous plus.

Bottom line, I think this is a great camera. It's like the Oly but in a better/smaller body with better features. I am very happy about the upgrade, and I think the NEX is going to be with me for a very long time. Planning on picking up the 18-200 lens and the fisheye also. And the upgraded flash. I definitely need to sell my Samsung, I could probably also sell my Sony T100, and if I was really being honest I could probably also sell my D80, but I bet I won't.

tl;dr: the NEX-5 is awesome, go get one right now.

Pics:
Amalga Harbor:

OMW home from work:

At work:

Low light action (it was pretty dark!):
 
Warpdrv

Warpdrv

Audioholic Ninja
WOW, those are awesome pics - you should feel lucky every day that you are able to have such beautiful scenery like that in your life !!!

There is certainly something to be said about this world, and as I get older the more I feel like I'm missing out on such incredible places to experience...

Thanks for posting.... color me jealous !!
 
Warpdrv

Warpdrv

Audioholic Ninja
Picked up some new toys today....

There was local guy selling some lenses though a craigslist ad, and got a SpeedLight SB-600 with diffuser, Nikon 16-85VR lens, and a Tamron 90mm macro for almost 50% the price of new. Everything was in perfect shape and the guy took nice care of his gear, he was also selling a D300, and a Nikon 70-300 VR + other stuff, but that was enough for me at the time. I thought about the 70-300 but Tamron just came out with a new one, that seems to be getter great reviews, better then the old tried and true nikon, so I may look into that direction.





Turns out he was quite the audiophool as well and had a nice setup with Usher speakers and SVS PC12-plus. We had a good long chat and on my way I went...
 
Sheep

Sheep

Audioholic Warlord
Ah you grabbed the omni bounce too, nice.

Yeah the Sb600 is the best all round option for flashes as long as you don't need wireless.

SheepStar
 
Warpdrv

Warpdrv

Audioholic Ninja
So I have an issue.....

The SB-600, great speedlight.... The 16-85mm VR is great as well... but it seems that the Tamron 90mm Macro is not compatible with the new D7000. At first I thought the lens was bad, the AF is not working at all. Manual is perfect and works like a charm, cool super closeups.

We headed over to the Sugar Mama's parents house today, and I was showing her dad the new additions. We dropped the Tamron into the D90 and it worked just like it should. AF right off the bat no problem..... I'm not sure what I need to do to get it working. I got it for such a good price, I can just give it to him to use, and he'll use it for sure - he loved it right off the bat...

Any Suggestions.... Am I doing something wrong, we went through a bunch of settings just not sure what would cause the problem.

Also, what photo/camera forum would you guys suggest.... there seems to be a goofy format to some of them - unlike this type forum...?
 
mike c

mike c

Audioholic Warlord
i've heard about that, the D7000 has something different in it that kicks out most 3rd party lenses.

you have to have the tamron re-chipped or just buy a nikon version.

i hang around two photo forums ... one is a dedicated canon forum (friendly and vbulletin too) the other is fredmiranda.com, they have a nikon forum but unfortunately is populated equally by helpful people and just plain d!ck know it alls.
 
M

MidnightSensi2

Audioholic Chief
I just ordered a tripod for my Canon D5 Mk.II. I went with a Manfrotto aluminum one with a ball head, about a 100 bucks.

I'm such a novice and I have to do some shooting for work in the next couple weeks, kinda nervous and way over my head, but they don't want to pay for a pro.

Any tips on shooting at night? Especially people. It'll be a party, so, I won't have the room or time for any long setups, it will have to be point and shoot for most of it. I was thinking of setting my ISO on auto, using Aperature Priority? What would be a good setup for nightclub and outside night shooting?

The Tripod I'm going to use for some wider shots of equipment and /try/ to get some long exposure shots with people blurring across the scene.

HELP!@#!~@#$! :eek::eek::eek::eek:
 
CaliHwyPatrol

CaliHwyPatrol

Audioholic Chief
Got some new hottness along with my 2.8L:




Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
 
Warpdrv

Warpdrv

Audioholic Ninja
Got some new hottness along with my 2.8L:

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
thats cool.... what did you pay for that one...?

i've heard about that, the D7000 has something different in it that kicks out most 3rd party lenses.

you have to have the tamron re-chipped or just buy a nikon version.

i hang around two photo forums ... one is a dedicated canon forum (friendly and vbulletin too) the other is fredmiranda.com, they have a nikon forum but unfortunately is populated equally by helpful people and just plain d!ck know it alls.

If it comes down to a cost involved with rechipping the lens, I'll just give it to the GF's father, he'll enjoy it and it works just fine with the D90.

Tamron offers no transferrable warranty, but the seller is a very nice guy and would stand behind the lens, and its still under a 6 year warranty bought in 07 locally.

Its been nice to see what a Macro lens can do as shown in the Cats Eye pic on the photos thread.. turned out nice. I'm sure I'll be investing in a few lenses....

Gotta say that battery life on this camera is awesome - many days of shooting and just messing around with it on the first charge, I went to charge the battery last night just to top it off, even though it was only down to 1/2. Thats almost a week, though I shot only 1 short HD video.
 
dkane360

dkane360

Audioholic Field Marshall
So I have a lot of pictures that I'd like to back up online, and I have to chose between Photobucket pro and Flickr pro. Anyone have any experience with either? I'm leaning towards Flickr, because it has integration with Aperture that will let me upload directly.
 
CaliHwyPatrol

CaliHwyPatrol

Audioholic Chief
I have Pro both, and it seems like Flikr is a little better for sharing. I like Photobucket for storing online, and it's good for sharing, but Flickr is easier for letting people post comments and whatnot. I had Photobucket first, but had I gotten to Flickr first, I probably never would have signed up for Photobucket.

I say go Flickr.
 
droht

droht

Full Audioholic
I just ordered a tripod for my Canon D5 Mk.II. I went with a Manfrotto aluminum one with a ball head, about a 100 bucks.

I'm such a novice and I have to do some shooting for work in the next couple weeks, kinda nervous and way over my head, but they don't want to pay for a pro.

Any tips on shooting at night? Especially people. It'll be a party, so, I won't have the room or time for any long setups, it will have to be point and shoot for most of it. I was thinking of setting my ISO on auto, using Aperature Priority? What would be a good setup for nightclub and outside night shooting?

The Tripod I'm going to use for some wider shots of equipment and /try/ to get some long exposure shots with people blurring across the scene.

HELP!@#!~@#$! :eek::eek::eek::eek:

What lenses do you have to choose from? Can you use/do you have a flash?
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top