When was the last time you heard a new, valid political point? It's the same stuff over and over. If people aren't sure about their beliefs, they probably aren't going to join the debate in the first place.
And statistics and information in general can be exploited so rediculously, the real truth is almost never known. Maybe we should start a post teaching a college statistics course, learn about SRS's, data exploitation, and all that other junk, and then have a discussion. Then the posts might actually accomplish something, instead of just going back and forth about how each other's information isn't correct.
It isn't my right to say whether or not political discussions should be allowed, but it is my belief that nothing is ever accomplished, hence my pro vote. I think it should just be an accepted rule, not something the moderators actually enforce, just an unwritten agreement.