Passion for Ascend speakers

STRONGBADF1

STRONGBADF1

Audioholic Spartan
Ideally, one wants the most neutral speaker.
Hi WmAx/Chris,

That makes sense to me and what I have been thinking all along. People just normaly get more excited about something that is suppose to work so well.

Unfortunately, the measurement methods commonly used in publications do not properly reveal panel born resonances that often occur in the 300-1000 Hz region. Assuming that the Ascend Acoustics unit has a good enclosure[or if you will spend $30 and take a few hours to make some easy modifications] with minimal resonances, I would recommend this over any other speaker in it's price range.
Do you know if the Ascends (340se and/or 170se) have these resonances? and if so how bad? Can you describe or give a link to the modification you spoke of? Is this something specific for the Ascend speakers or a generic mod. that could be used on most speakers.

If the speaker has 'emotion' or whatever term you want to adhere to it, is irrelevant:
I know I want a neutral speaker because of all the different styles of music my wife and I listen to. I'm not trying to find a speaker with emotion I am trying to find a speaker that isn't hollow if you know what I mean. (It's so difficult to describe the way a speaker performs)

because of it's extreme neutral behaviour, you can use a high-grade equalizer[Behringer DEQ2496 for example] to alter the response predictably and achieve any 'signature' that you so desire -- much better than if you are using a speaker that is not starting out as a neutral system. Do not balk at the idea of using an equalizer; most speakers have a built-in equalization curve via the crossover used. You can have the power to customize the equalization curve to your optimal taste if you take a logical approach to the situation.
I love EQ's thats my down fall...:rolleyes: It's amazing the difference just a minor adjustment can make. It took me a long time to learn to take away not add with an EQ but I still have to "forget it's there" and not change it because one song sounded flat or boomy or whatever.

The two most valuble things this site taught me is to realize how bad alot of recordings are and how important the speaker/room interaction is.

Note: based on the off axis response plots available, it is of my opinion that the Ascend will benefit substantially from some minor absorption of the first reflections on the side walls. However, the off axis response is not terrible, as it is from some speakers(which absolutely require heavy off axis absorption in order to sound good).
It's good that the first reflection point only needs minor absorption because the chances of my wife alowing any absorption is minimal.:( (The room is our living room which is also the entrance room of the house.)


SBF1
 
WmAx

WmAx

Audioholic Samurai
STRONGBADF1 said:
Do you know if the Ascends (340se and/or 170se) have these resonances? and if so how bad?
Unfortunately, I do not know, but most speakers(including entry level so-called high-end) have panel resonances that can be audible. So I would not fault the Ascends on this factor alone unless it was extreme(as in the case of some speakers).

Can you describe or give a link to the modification you spoke of? Is this something specific for the Ascend speakers or a generic mod. that could be used on most speakers.
The modification is simple. You take a mass loaded damping product like Dynamat(used in car audio) or a generic material that will have the same function(Peel'N'Seal used for roofing, found readily in Lowe's for example) and apply[the material has adhesive on one side] layers of this thin material on the inside of the cabinet walls. As a rule to be most effective, you should put in enough layers on top of one another until it reaches a thickness of at least 25%(but I always use about 33% of the thickness) of the cabinet wall thickness. The actual effectiveness per amount of material varies with the damping product you use, but these are general percentages that have been found to work well. The modification is easy, but it is time consuming. You have to remove the largest driver(s) and hope that no internal cabinet braces are blocking your access to the internal walls. I would expect the brace on the Ascend 340 to be located in the center of the cabinet behind the tweeter, thereby allowing you access to the walls by removing both the top and bottom mid-woofer. You have to remove the acoustic batting material. Application of the mass-loaded damping material in thin layers, navigating around the braces, cutting out the material and building up to the desired thickness, could take several hours. So be aware of this factor. However, if the walls had audible resonances before this process, they certainly can not afterwards if you used a thick enough application of the material on all of the internal surfaces. While the product is apart, you could also try to determine if the acoustic batting used is sufficient to remove all internal acoustic resonances. To do a sort of rough test, you can make loud instance noises with your voice into the cabinet and see if you perceive any colorations in the midrange band. To be safe, you could replace what is used with a material such as 2" rigid 6# fiberglass (Owens Corning 705 is an example) or 2" 8# Mineral Board while you have the device disassembled. Note: the more effective material may also reduce the output of the the port, thereby reducing bass output by some degree, due to various reasons. This is a compromise that must be decided in cases of passive radiator/ported bass systems that are also producing midrange band.


I love EQ's thats my down fall...:rolleyes: It's amazing the difference just a minor adjustment can make. It took me a long time to learn to take away not add with an EQ but I still have to "forget it's there" and not change it because one song sounded flat or boomy or whatever.
There is no problem with boosting if it is not done so excessively as to cause possible problems(for example boosting bass by 10 dB is asking for clipping problems and overdrive of the speakers mechanically). A gentle boost of 2dB across the bass or treble should not be a problem, for example.

It's good that the first reflection point only needs minor absorption because the chances of my wife alowing any absorption is minimal.:( (The room is our living room which is also the entrance room of the house.)
Strategically place a bookshelf with books or fabric covered couch/chair, etc. at the first side reflection points of this speaker if need be; that should be sufficient in this case. While not an ideal solution or sum of what is required for optimal acoustic behaviour; I would expect this to improve the response in your particular situation.

-Chris
 
Last edited:
billy p

billy p

Audioholic Ninja
Strategically place a bookshelf with books or fabric covered couch/chair, etc. at the first side reflection points of this speaker if need be; that should be sufficient in this case. While not an ideal solution or sum of what is required for optimal acoustic behaviour; I would expect this to improve the response in your particular situation.

-Chris[/QUOTE]
Bookshelf speaker as they are called is it wise to place them in a bookcase.I ask this because most bookcase unit have a backing (board) in back to hold books from falling out as well as extra support.If the port is tight to that wall will it help the sound or hurt the sound or are they better off on stands?:eek:
 
WmAx

WmAx

Audioholic Samurai
billy p said:
Bookshelf speaker as they are called is it wise to place them in a bookcase.I ask this because most bookcase unit have a backing (board) in back to hold books from falling out as well as extra support.If the port is tight to that wall will it help the sound or hurt the sound or are they better off on stands?:eek:
No, it is a bad idea to place them in a bookshelf or very close to the rear wall boundary at all, unless they were specifically designed for such application(s). The speaker will have a shelving contour[referred to as baffle step compensation] of the frequency response designed to account for the change in space radiation as the wavelengths dispersed begin to exceed 1/2 the width of the cabinet, and the speaker is not against a wall. Placing against a wall or placed in a bookshelf will cause interaction with this contour, resulting in emphasized lower midrange/bass. If the speaker has a rear port, then you probably going to interfere with this as well. The bookshelf placement will also probably cause other problems that I will not go into at this moment.

-Chris
 
B

bpape

Audioholic Chief
The Ascends are, as has been stated, a pretty neutral speaker that really doesn't have any major flaws. There isn't any one thing that makes them stand out as other speakers may - but - they also don't have the flaws. Top it off with excellent customer service and a very reasonable price and they, IMO, represent a tremendous value.

It kind of reminds me of the VW commercials with all the guys with fancy cars and bullhorns - where the VW is tagged as a 'low ego emissions' vehicle.

I guess maybe that's why you get the reactions you do from their owners. I've not heard anyone who's purchased them who's been at all disappointed.

Bryan
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
I can't fault them for being neutral, but I didn't really find them exactly neutral, they seemed just a touch bright. They are an excellent speaker overall though.

The cabinets are not completely dead and with the knuckle wrap test, they sounded very solid. They seem very well constructed. With my old Paradigm Monitors, you could hear the cabinets - I didn't hear anything that shouldn't have been there with the 340s.
 
T

Tex-amp

Senior Audioholic
bpape said:
It kind of reminds me of the VW commercials with all the guys with fancy cars and bullhorns - where the VW is tagged as a 'low ego emissions' vehicle.

Bryan
This may go with the person askings about the level of emotion in people's posts about their Ascend. Sort of the people that emotionally need a a nice veneer before they hear the sound aren't going to buy Ascends to begin with.
 
billy p

billy p

Audioholic Ninja
Tex-amp said:
This may go with the person askings about the level of emotion in people's posts about their Ascend. Sort of the people that emotionally need a a nice veneer before they hear the sound aren't going to buy Ascends to begin with.
That's why we have chocolate and vanilla?.:D
 
STRONGBADF1

STRONGBADF1

Audioholic Spartan
All good stuff guys. Always good to ask even if your pretty shure what the answer is going to be. Got some additional info also. Very good!:cool:

Thank you,
SBF1
 
M

marky

Junior Audioholic
you know when a person is too perfect that they lack the flaws that makes them human? I think that is how some of the people feel about these speakers. Most speakers have an identity that makes them what they are. A specific sonic characteristic. However, I believe these specific traits that defines these speakers will in a sense "color" what the original source is conveying. Thats why you get people who like certain kinds of sounds. Theres nothing wrong with it, its just that it might not be what the source is putting out. I guess you can say that the Ascends flaw, if you want to call it that, is that they are too perfect. I for one much prefer the neutrality of these speakers. I am one of those that think they sound better and better as time goes on. I think that Ascend owners love their speakers and people that dont own them can't say whats wrong with them because they are so use to "their sound".
 
T

Tex-amp

Senior Audioholic
marky said:
you know when a person is too perfect that they lack the flaws that makes them human? I think that is how some of the people feel about these speakers. Most speakers have an identity that makes them what they are. A specific sonic characteristic. However, I believe these specific traits that defines these speakers will in a sense "color" what the original source is conveying. Thats why you get people who like certain kinds of sounds. Theres nothing wrong with it, its just that it might not be what the source is putting out. I guess you can say that the Ascends flaw, if you want to call it that, is that they are too perfect. I for one much prefer the neutrality of these speakers. I am one of those that think they sound better and better as time goes on. I think that Ascend owners love their speakers and people that dont own them can't say whats wrong with them because they are so use to "their sound".

I know a musician who sums this up as, "the Ascends just don't do anything wrong."
 
billy p

billy p

Audioholic Ninja
Tex-amp

somewhere I read you may have compared the ascend 340 and axiom M22v2 I may be wrong but you and your buds tested some speakers a while back just curious.:)
Billy p:)
PS: if so your thoughts?
 
T

Tex-amp

Senior Audioholic
It was a get together in Austin with about 25 guys and the nearly everyone preferred the 170 to the M22. It was the original 170 and I think the same for the M22.

We compared the M60 with the Rocket 550II and the original Ascend 340 and the M60 was at the bottom of nearly everyone's list. The original Ascend 340 and the Rocket 550II took some real careful listening to tell apart.
 
I

ichigo

Full Audioholic
I think its easy to prefer the Ascends over the Axioms in full-range mode (rather than paired with a sub), as the deeper bass is immediately felt. In fact, the Axioms have very anemic bass compared to most bookshelves. It's almost strange because it has more volume and more cone area than the Ascend 170, yet lacks the bass of many smaller speakers.
 
WmAx

WmAx

Audioholic Samurai
ichigo said:
I think its easy to prefer the Ascends over the Axioms in full-range mode (rather than paired with a sub), as the deeper bass is immediately felt. In fact, the Axioms have very anemic bass compared to most bookshelves. It's almost strange because it has more volume and more cone area than the Ascend 170, yet lacks the bass of many smaller speakers.
I would suspect that the very smooth [1] resonant free response of the Ascend 170, compared with the [2] poor lower range linearity of the Axiom 80 v2, would probalby push most people to prefer the Ascend. The <500 Hz rough response[and these are anechoic chamber measurements made at NRC, therefor the responses are accurate for these low frequencies] of the Axiom makes me suspect substantial cabinet resonance issues that should probably be dealt with unless one is afraid to void their warranty.

-Chris

[1] http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/measurements/ascend_cbm170/

[2] http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/measurements/axiom_m80v2/
 
B

bpape

Audioholic Chief
Just 2 more cents...

My personal preference is for the 170 over the 340. I think it's better balanced and images better. I can't tell you how many good rooms I've heard with 3 170's across the front coupled with an HSU VTF3 sub. They just fit together well.

Bryan
 
I

ichigo

Full Audioholic
WmAx said:
I would suspect that the very smooth [1] resonant free response of the Ascend 170, compared with the [2] poor lower range linearity of the Axiom 80 v2, would probalby push most people to prefer the Ascend. The <500 Hz rough response[and these are anechoic chamber measurements made at NRC, therefor the responses are accurate for these low frequencies] of the Axiom makes me suspect substantial cabinet resonance issues that should probably be dealt with unless one is afraid to void their warranty.

-Chris

[1] http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/measurements/ascend_cbm170/

[2] http://www.soundstagemagazine.com/measurements/axiom_m80v2/
The comparison is between two bookshelves, the Axiom M22 and the Ascend 170, not the Axiom M80, which is a floorstander. I seriously doubt anyone would say they heard/felt more bass from the small Ascend bookshelf compared to a large floorstander with multiple drivers and 270% more surface radiating area =P
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top