Onix x-ls Bookshelf Loudspeaker Review

S

silversurfer

Senior Audioholic
craigsub said:
....remote controlled, level matching switcher....
Craig, do you have any more info on this? I would like to have something like it if it is readily available.
 
D

Danny Richie

Audioholic Intern
Hi Guys,

I thought I'd join up so I could join in. I few things said caught my attention.

First off though, it is good to see some of our customers here. Thanks for posting about us.

Danny used to sell the driver for $24. So it is safe to assume he was buying them for 25-33% of that or less to make any money. That makes it a $6 to $8 dollar or less wholesale driver. And I'm betting they are buying in a lot more volume than Danny did reducing that cost even further.
First of all the woofer used in the XLS speaker is not the same driver that we sell. It is a larger 6.5" woofer. Similar in design but more expensive. Buying them for 25% of what I sell them for is wishful thinking.

Oh, and I get as good of a price on them as anyone can. I have been purchasing drivers from Peerless for a long time. Mark will need to order about another 7,500 more woofers to match what I have ordered from them thus far. I hope he does.

I am not sure why they pictured my tweeters in the review either. They are not the same.

On a side note, I will bet the Gr Research board meeting you attended must have been thrilling when the board discovered they were making a 67 to 75% profit margin on these drivers ...
Yea I wish.

I noticed a slight descrepancy in the -3dB point. The reviewer measured the extension to be 60hz, and the published specs say 55hz.
I noticed that too. I wonder how they got that figure. It makes me wonder where they spliced in their near field measurement. The tuning frequency of 42Hz matches my own. The -3db down point should measure no higher than 57Hz.

That woofer is actually in a less than an optimal sized box. In an optimal ported enclosure it will -3db down at 45Hz.

They also noted two "cons". I guess they had to fill that space with something.

Noisy port was one of them. Maybe I never playing them hard enough for that 2" port to make any noise. It couldn't be much of any even if played really hard.

Secondly they said, "Crossover network and network components not oriented to minimize cross talk". The only way cross talk could occur is between inductors and nothing else. While they are both mounted flat on the board (in the same direction) they are not close enough to one another to have any real effect. If they were right next to each other then sure, but not in this case.

If that is all that could be picked then I can't complain. It was a damn fine review.

Actually, Silversurfer they originally spec.ed these speakers to 40Hz until folks questioned how that was possible. Then it was an "error" and extension rose to 55Hz.
The error was a result in getting the tuning frequency confused with the F3.

This means Danny would be making $67 to $75 per $100 ...
I wish.

I would not jump ahead to thinking they will be a match for the 170SE's. A few Blind tests between the two seems like a good idea, but I would be surprised if the x-ls matched the 170's in such a test.
Ha, ha, ha. All I can say is good luck to all the rest of the speakers mentioned. I can't wait for you guys to compare them. My expectations are that the XLS will come out on top regardless of price.

In fact you guys are wasting too much time trying to figure out how much these cost to produce based on the price and how much money there is left to be made by Mark. Who says he's making money on these things? I told him he was giving them away. But what do I know about marketing? Throwing a gem like this out there for nothing as a loss leader is good for the customer and a great calling card for AV123. No one will be able to match this dollar for dollar.
 
C

craigsub

Audioholic Chief
silversurfer said:
Craig, do you have any more info on this? I would like to have something like it if it is readily available.
I had it custom built. We can do instant A/B switching between 4 pairs of speakers. The guys who did it did so as a favor - if they tried to sell one of these, it would run about $750.
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
Hey Danny!

Danny Richie said:
First of all the woofer used in the XLS speaker is not the same driver that we sell. It is a larger 6.5" woofer. Similar in design but more expensive. Buying them for 25% of what I sell them for is wishful thinking.
D'OH. I didn't notice that it was 6.5 vs 5.25. Not sure how I missed that...

Any info you can share on the center? :)
 
Last edited:
S

silversurfer

Senior Audioholic
Oh well. I imagine it has some kind of high quality attenuation. I am sure you will get some argument that at least one set of speakers, the set with the highest efficiency, is not getting as "pure" of a signal as the others because of more attenuation.

Still, that is a cool tool.

The best setup I have encountered has been a mono signal from a CD player being fed into a switch which switched between feeding the signal into the left or right channel of a pre/pro, then those channels feeding a power amp, and those channels feeding seperate speakers(level matching at the pre/pro).

This setup made it extremely easy to compare speakers with the same signal going to both.
 
I

ichigo

Full Audioholic
wilkenboy said:
This is the matchup I would be most interested in. Their FR plots look pretty darn similar.

I've heard Ascend 170s touted in on-line reviews as "giant killers" - if the Onix x-ls were comparable at roughly 1/2 the price, would that make them the "giant killer killers?"

I'm looking for some funds to be available toward the end of March or early April... its looking like I'll order a pair of each:

Onix x-ls
Ascend CBM-170
Axiom M3ti

And do my own subjective testing. Winner gets a comfy spot in my home. (7 of them actually) - Loser takes an extra trip.

That is, unless the fine folks here can arrange a side-by-side before that.

~Josh
I can't wait to hear the results; it seems like none of the creators think "their" speaker can be topped so the results of your listening session should be interesting : )

With all the hype on the first two, it'll be really funny if the Axioms win ^^
 
wilkenboy

wilkenboy

Full Audioholic
ichigo said:
I can't wait to hear the results; it seems like none of the creators think "their" speaker can be topped so the results of your listening session should be interesting :
Yes it should! I wish I had some free funds now - I'd pull the trigger and put this to bed, for myself at least.

Due to lack of measurement equipment my review will be mainly subjective - I can't do anything fancy in the way of measurement aside from in-room FR using my rat-shack SPL meter. If anyone has some recommendations or requests on what they'd like tested I'll start putting together the protocol.

Of course if the manufacturers really believe in their product they'd donate them to me for the duration of the test... and let a layman put them through their paces. :rolleyes:

Looking forward to it, then posting all the glorious pics and impressions here.

~Josh
 
wilkenboy

wilkenboy

Full Audioholic
Danny Richie said:
Picture an A/V-3S with larger 6.5" woofers, fully shielded, and 8 ohms.:)
Any sneak preview of availability date and a price point? I would gladly be a beta tester if you're looking!

~Josh
 
STRONGBADF1

STRONGBADF1

Audioholic Spartan
Danny Richie said:
Picture an A/V-3S with larger 6.5" woofers, fully shielded, and 8 ohms.:)
So will it or won't it be good as a left/right/surround?:confused:


SBF1
 
sts9fan

sts9fan

Banned
Where were the Gr Research reviews pre av123? I know they have been around and well respected for awhile.
 
wilkenboy

wilkenboy

Full Audioholic
I'm hesitant to post this as likely I'm going to have someone telling me why its wrong to do this, but I think it might spur some good discussion. If nothing else I'll learn.

I took the SPL vs freq plots of my three main contenders and overlaid them for comparison in Photoshop.

Onix x-ls ($200/pair) - FR plot taken from the audioholics review.
Ascend Acoustics CBM-170SE ($350/pair) - taken from their website.
Axiom M3ti ($320/pair) - taken from their website.

First of all, just to show that all was fair and square, here's the original overlay before I began to clean it all up - this shows that the frequencies and SPL scales line up for each. But its hard to read.



Then I took and cleaned up everything but a single scale and the actual traces. Here's what pops out:



Observations / conclusions:

  • It appears that Ascend is not using the same resolution in the sweep as the AV123 Onix and Axioms are. Just a point of observation that while it appears smoother this is likely due to test equipment setup and not actual performance.
  • The Onix x-ls appears to keep up with the CBM-170s in all areas but low frequency extension, where the 170s seem to go about 10-15 Hz lower (eyeballing it)
  • I think this pretty clearly shows why some folks describe the Axiom M3s as being "brighter" than the 170s. There is a roughly 3dB lift in frequencies above 2kHz compared to those below 2kHz.
  • It seems to me that the x-ls and 170s would, from these charts, sound more "neutral" than the M3s. Thats not to say that some folks wouldn't prefer one sound over another.

Guys, I'm a EE, not an acoustical engineer. So go ahead, fire away at what I've done here. I've got a thick skin.

(EDIT: I know this is not the only way to measure speaker performance, but its the only data I could find for all three.)

~Josh
 
Last edited:
J

jmanlp

Audioholic
All I can say is from the look of it as soon as these get grills I am getting a pair for my newborn for his first pair of speakers, and maybe I'll listen to them a little too ;)
 
j_garcia

j_garcia

Audioholic Jedi
That's interesting, I didn't realize the SEs would have that much bass extension. That was my only issue with the original 170s, but these guys look pretty good on paper too (granted the testing methodology does not appear the same). For the price though, I think the X-LS is looking damn good, and I don't mind if they have grilles. I'm going to wait for the MTM version though...:D
 
C

craigsub

Audioholic Chief
Wilkenboy - Pretty cool stuff with the graphs. You are possibly right that the 170 SE's are "smoothed" ... It is pretty difficult to do a direct comparison of different measurement sessions done with different equipment. The Ascend graph LOOKS like a Melissa 1/3rd octave, but they don't specify, so it could be higher resolution.

It will be fun comparing all three speakers - We may just have to do a blind test comparison between the three speakers, using a listening panel, open to the public style of test.
 
S

silversurfer

Senior Audioholic
From an email to DaveF, I asked, it is MLSSA, but 1/12 octave. I think it is also stated on thier forum.

The NRC measurements(the Axiom graph) are not gated and in 5hz slices or better. Their is an NRC measurement of the "classic" CBM-170 as well.

Craig is right though, comparing measurements done with different equipment and rooms is not a good comparison. That said, I am a big fan of the Soundstage reviews and the measurements they take at the NRC.
 
D

Danny Richie

Audioholic Intern
Any sneak preview of availability date and a price point?
You'll have to ask Mark on that one.

So will it or won't it be good as a left/right/surround?
It would be great for a left or right main too.

For you guys concerned about low end extension you can always go with a pair of XLS speakers and the X-sub and get them both for under $400.

If you want to compare apples to apples then how's this. We'll be putting the XLS speaker in a larger and more optimal ported enclosure as a small floor standing speaker. All the drivers, crossover, and performance will be the same but with more low end extension.

It will hit a -3db of 45Hz. You won't need to purchase stands, and Mark is going to bring these out at $329. a pair and at a $299. a pair family price.
 
M

mlschifter

Audioholic Intern
Tex-amp said:
Actually, Silversurfer they originally spec.ed these speakers to 40Hz until folks questioned how that was possible. Then it was an "error" and extension rose to 55Hz. This company had a similiar "error" when one of their speakers didn't measure well. They quietly discontinued that speaker shortly there after.
What's wrong Tex... feeling uneasy... don't --- there is plenty of room for Ascend AND av123... really...

Relax and enjoy... this was a simple mistake and it was quickly corrected... The data speaks for itself...

I've always thought you to be a nice / even-handed person... even the ride in your mini van proved that to me... Be easy on us... It's hard to manage all facets of the business all the time...

And BTW... the 750's were a photo sample... and the guys at Stereophile and I sorted that out real quick (yes... I read your reply elsewhere about this... ;) )...

So... Peace my friend... I'm CERTAIN David would not approve of, nor enjoy your sniping...

All the best...

mls
 
Sheep

Sheep

Audioholic Warlord
I love how nowadays people think they can just say whether or not they approve of the review. Almost like audioholics submits reviews to you, where actually they LET you seem them..

SheepStar
 
M

MUCHO

Audioholic Intern
Great review thanks.

I'm debating between these, the Ascends, and the SVS speakers.

I'm a little bit at a loss as to how I can mount these.

They are rear ported (?) so they have to be 3-4 " away from the wall if crossed over at 80 hz I assume. Is this correct?

Mounting information would be great. I'm loving the price of the 5.1 setup but if I have to spend another $100 to mount them...whats the point?
 

Latest posts

newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top