On Trump

mtrycrafts · 2026-01-18T18:47:48-0600

Mr._Clark said:
According to The Atlantic, less than 1% of the Epstein files have been released.

>>>But what actually arrived on December 19, the Friday before Christmas, was a relatively small (and sloppily redacted) tranche of files that raised far more questions than it answered. Nearly a month later, not a whole lot has changed. Despite having published a second batch, the DOJ has still released less than 1 percent of the millions of documents now under review. . . . Each new revelation about the files seems to multiply the unknowns.<<< (emphasis added)

What’s Going on With the Epstein Files?

Less than 1 percent of them have been released.

www.theatlantic.com

Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act on November 19, 2025 and the deadline to release the files was December 19, 2025. At the present rate (1% every 2 months) it will be almost 17 years before all of the files are released.

The DOJ has made various statements concerning the reasons for the delay. From the Atlantic article:

>>>In a letter yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi and other DOJ officials framed the problem as purely logistical, citing “inevitable glitches due to the sheer volume of materials.”<<<

Did Trump not know there were logistical issues when he signed the act into law? Was he truely clueless about what was involved? "Clueless" seems plausible, but I'm inclined to think he signed it for PR/political purposes without intending to comply with the law.

Trump is not shy about blasting prosecutors if they don't after his political oponents:

>>>At the event for U.S. attorneys, Trump reportedly chided his U.S. attorneys for failing to prosecute his opponents quickly enough.

The Wall Street Journal reported that he called the prosecutors weak and ineffective, suggesting they were making it difficult for Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to do their jobs.<<<

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5693481-doj-fights-trump-prosecutors-setbacks/

Perhaps I missed it, but I don't think Trump gone after the DOJ for not releasing the Epstein files quickly enough.

I have no doubt tha releasing the Epstein files is a massive undertaking that requires significant resources, but still, 1%?

He is also clueless. Just saw a clip about a pardon. He said I was told by someone good to pardon a criminal. He has no clue what the person did or ir is not concerned. Most likely another under the table $$$ exchange for the pardon.

lovinthehd · 2026-01-18T19:19:23-0600

mtrycrafts said:
He is also clueless. Just saw a clip about a pardon. He said I was told by someone good to pardon a criminal. He has no clue what the person did or ir is not concerned. Most likely another under the table $$$ exchange for the pardon.

D'oh. He never knows anyone he knows in a negative way.

Dude#1279435 · 2026-01-19T04:12:46-0600

Mr._Clark said:
According to The Atlantic, less than 1% of the Epstein files have been released.

>>>But what actually arrived on December 19, the Friday before Christmas, was a relatively small (and sloppily redacted) tranche of files that raised far more questions than it answered. Nearly a month later, not a whole lot has changed. Despite having published a second batch, the DOJ has still released less than 1 percent of the millions of documents now under review. . . . Each new revelation about the files seems to multiply the unknowns.<<< (emphasis added)

What’s Going on With the Epstein Files?

Less than 1 percent of them have been released.

www.theatlantic.com

Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act on November 19, 2025 and the deadline to release the files was December 19, 2025. At the present rate (1% every 2 months) it will be almost 17 years before all of the files are released.

The DOJ has made various statements concerning the reasons for the delay. From the Atlantic article:

>>>In a letter yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi and other DOJ officials framed the problem as purely logistical, citing “inevitable glitches due to the sheer volume of materials.”<<<

Did Trump not know there were logistical issues when he signed the act into law? Was he truely clueless about what was involved? "Clueless" seems plausible, but I'm inclined to think he signed it for PR/political purposes without intending to comply with the law.

Trump is not shy about blasting prosecutors if they don't after his political oponents:

>>>At the event for U.S. attorneys, Trump reportedly chided his U.S. attorneys for failing to prosecute his opponents quickly enough.

The Wall Street Journal reported that he called the prosecutors weak and ineffective, suggesting they were making it difficult for Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to do their jobs.<<<

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5693481-doj-fights-trump-prosecutors-setbacks/

Perhaps I missed it, but I don't think Trump gone after the DOJ for not releasing the Epstein files quickly enough.

I have no doubt tha releasing the Epstein files is a massive undertaking that requires significant resources, but still, 1%?

I've already seen the files. Not in the physical sense but I watch video of Trump/Epstein looking buddy buddy and concluded Trump knew about Epstein's activities. Sure I guuuuueeeeesssss we need the files for proof but it's Trump. I'd be entirely surprised if he didn't know about it. I think most people out there have concluded the same to include the right, with exception to maybe MAGA.

GO-NAD! · 2026-01-19T04:21:20-0600

Mr._Clark said:
According to The Atlantic, less than 1% of the Epstein files have been released.

>>>But what actually arrived on December 19, the Friday before Christmas, was a relatively small (and sloppily redacted) tranche of files that raised far more questions than it answered. Nearly a month later, not a whole lot has changed. Despite having published a second batch, the DOJ has still released less than 1 percent of the millions of documents now under review. . . . Each new revelation about the files seems to multiply the unknowns.<<< (emphasis added)

What’s Going on With the Epstein Files?

Less than 1 percent of them have been released.

www.theatlantic.com

Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act on November 19, 2025 and the deadline to release the files was December 19, 2025. At the present rate (1% every 2 months) it will be almost 17 years before all of the files are released.

The DOJ has made various statements concerning the reasons for the delay. From the Atlantic article:

>>>In a letter yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi and other DOJ officials framed the problem as purely logistical, citing “inevitable glitches due to the sheer volume of materials.”<<<

Did Trump not know there were logistical issues when he signed the act into law? Was he truely clueless about what was involved? "Clueless" seems plausible, but I'm inclined to think he signed it for PR/political purposes without intending to comply with the law.

Trump is not shy about blasting prosecutors if they don't after his political oponents:

>>>At the event for U.S. attorneys, Trump reportedly chided his U.S. attorneys for failing to prosecute his opponents quickly enough.

The Wall Street Journal reported that he called the prosecutors weak and ineffective, suggesting they were making it difficult for Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to do their jobs.<<<

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5693481-doj-fights-trump-prosecutors-setbacks/

Perhaps I missed it, but I don't think Trump gone after the DOJ for not releasing the Epstein files quickly enough.

I have no doubt tha releasing the Epstein files is a massive undertaking that requires significant resources, but still, 1%?

C'mon man, have some sympathy for the poor DOJ! How are supposed to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act when they're too busy trying to dig up dirt on Walz, Frey and Renee Good's wife!?

Dude#1279435 · 2026-01-19T05:21:28-0600

She claims they asked if she had any weapons inside the house and if she attended any Democrat functions LOL.

Secret Service visits mom who posted she wants trials for Trump officials

Nebraska mom Jamie Bonkiewicz filmed her interaction with Secret Service agents who came to her door because of a tweet. "The Secret Service came to my door today because of a tweet. No threats. No violence. Just words. That’s where we are now," she wrote on X in a thread about the ordeal. "For...

www.alternet.org