highfigh

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
Do the manufacturers sell directly to the carteI think not, so THEY aren't the suppliers.
Don't be so naive. The Sackler family didn't put oxycontin in the hands of addicts, yet they were held liable.
[/QUOTE]

There's a big difference between (from Wiki) "Purdue Pharma played a "special role" in the opioid crisis because the company "was the first to set out, in the nineteen-nineties, to persuade the American medical establishment that strong opioids should be much more widely prescribed—and that physicians’ longstanding fears about the addictive nature of such drugs were overblown." . However, where does liability for the physicians who over-perscribed Oxy, even after the massive problems reared their ugly heads? Purdue clearly lied, but the addictive aspect was known prtty early and Drs just steamed on, writing scrips for millions of people unless the patients refused it.

In the case of guns and cartels, the manufacturers sell to dealers and distributors, who then sell to end users, hopefully legally. If any of them skirt the laws, they need to be held liable in every way- anyone who is found to have sold to anyone in a cartel needs to go away, in every sense.

But, what about Fast & Furious? That was a government operation. With Mexican government connections with cartels, are you sure where the cartels get their weapons?
 
cpp

cpp

Audioholic Ninja
I was reading an article in a local paper and its interesting that Trump and Musk aren't the first to cut back govt departments. The biggest effort to overhaul the federal government in modern history actually was 30 years ago under a Democratic administration. It was then-President Bill Clinton's “ Reinventing Government ” initiative, under the control of his vice president, Al Gore. But Clinton carried out his plan with some thought and humanity, not a dictator mentality like Trump..
 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
There's a big difference between (from Wiki) "Purdue Pharma played a "special role" in the opioid crisis because the company "was the first to set out, in the nineteen-nineties, to persuade the American medical establishment that strong opioids should be much more widely prescribed—and that physicians’ longstanding fears about the addictive nature of such drugs were overblown." . However, where does liability for the physicians who over-perscribed Oxy, even after the massive problems reared their ugly heads? Purdue clearly lied, but the addictive aspect was known prtty early and Drs just steamed on, writing scrips for millions of people unless the patients refused it.

In the case of guns and cartels, the manufacturers sell to dealers and distributors, who then sell to end users, hopefully legally. If any of them skirt the laws, they need to be held liable in every way- anyone who is found to have sold to anyone in a cartel needs to go away, in every sense.

But, what about Fast & Furious? That was a government operation. With Mexican government connections with cartels, are you sure where the cartels get their weapons?
No surprise that you’re carrying water for the Sackler family or the gun manufacturers.
 
Last edited:
Mikado463

Mikado463

Audioholic Spartan
No surprise that you’re carrying water for the Sackler family or the gun manufacturers.
LMAO, so I guess you're proud of the'Fast & Furious' fiasco under the Obama Admin and that Eric Holder clown. Trell, the problem you and many other 'head in the sand' liberals have is you can't admit the Dems have fair share of F-ups also !!
 
Last edited:
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Warlord
Don't be so naive. The Sackler family didn't put oxycontin in the hands of addicts, yet they were held liable.
There's a big difference between (from Wiki) "Purdue Pharma played a "special role" in the opioid crisis because the company "was the first to set out, in the nineteen-nineties, to persuade the American medical establishment that strong opioids should be much more widely prescribed—and that physicians’ longstanding fears about the addictive nature of such drugs were overblown." . However, where does liability for the physicians who over-perscribed Oxy, even after the massive problems reared their ugly heads? Purdue clearly lied, but the addictive aspect was known prtty early and Drs just steamed on, writing scrips for millions of people unless the patients refused it.

In the case of guns and cartels, the manufacturers sell to dealers and distributors, who then sell to end users, hopefully legally. If any of them skirt the laws, they need to be held liable in every way- anyone who is found to have sold to anyone in a cartel needs to go away, in every sense.

But, what about Fast & Furious? That was a government operation. With Mexican government connections with cartels, are you sure where the cartels get their weapons?
[/QUOTE]
 
GO-NAD!

GO-NAD!

Audioholic Warlord
There's a big difference between (from Wiki) "Purdue Pharma played a "special role" in the opioid crisis because the company "was the first to set out, in the nineteen-nineties, to persuade the American medical establishment that strong opioids should be much more widely prescribed—and that physicians’ longstanding fears about the addictive nature of such drugs were overblown." . However, where does liability for the physicians who over-perscribed Oxy, even after the massive problems reared their ugly heads? Purdue clearly lied, but the addictive aspect was known prtty early and Drs just steamed on, writing scrips for millions of people unless the patients refused it.

In the case of guns and cartels, the manufacturers sell to dealers and distributors, who then sell to end users, hopefully legally. If any of them skirt the laws, they need to be held liable in every way- anyone who is found to have sold to anyone in a cartel needs to go away, in every sense.

But, what about Fast & Furious? That was a government operation. With Mexican government connections with cartels, are you sure where the cartels get their weapons?
I mean it wouldn't be the first time a manufacturer was found to be complicit with smuggling their products.
 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
LMAO, so I guess you're proud of the'Fast & Furious' fiasco under the Obama Admin and that Eric Holder clown. Trell, the problem you and many other 'head in the sand' liberals is you can't admit the Dems have heir share of F-ups also !!
You must be very proud of the Sackler family that through their private held pharmaceutical company Perdue sold OxyContin that got tens of thousands of Americans killed, and managed to get over $12 billions in profit from those sales. The Sacklers and Perdue knew what they where doing and admitted "knowingly and intentionally conspired and agreed with others to aid and abet" doctors dispensing medication "without a legitimate medical purpose."

Real American heroes that you approve of. :rolleyes:
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top