Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) what do you guys think of it?

Alex2507

Alex2507

Audioholic Slumlord
we’re more sedentary than ever with computer jobs and screen time at record highs.
That's it, right there.

Being a monkey means climbing around and over sh!t all the time. Half the time while you're carrying around something heavy. It sucks and I hate it but I think it might be a big reason for me not having way more serious heart issues. I feel like I'd be dead if I was anything else.

All I really want to do is increase my screen time. And I wanna eat the whole time I'm in front of a screen.
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan
That's it, right there.

Being a monkey means climbing around and over sh!t all the time. Half the time while you're carrying around something heavy. It sucks and I hate it but I think it might be a big reason for me not having way more serious heart issues. I feel like I'd be dead if I was anything else.

All I really want to do is increase my screen time. And I wanna eat the whole time I'm in front of a screen.
It's why I quit sit down jobs. 40 a week on my feet doing something physical. I knew I wouldn't get exercise after work.
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan
If I were Kennedy I'd be bargaining with tv stations to air healthy eating, living, etc. It also helps to have educated people who understand what all these ingredients are, and who can communicate that LOL. I mean if Kennedy isn't even credentialed in health well there goes the saying 'experience matters'.
 
highfigh

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
I'd be curious to know what RFKs plan is. Seems like it should be a campaign for whole foods, less internet/phone, and exercise. Spending a lot of time on additives seems a waste when those very additives are in processed and junk foods. Plus we like our McDonalds and crap so making better ingredients for crap I hope I'm exaggerating.
Ever go to Culver's or In-N -Out Burger? Fresh ingredients, not frozen and definitely not pre-cooked, much better ingredients and IMO, nothing on McDonald's menu tastes good. I have posted about the last time I had McDonald's and it was not only terrible, it was almost ten bucks. Their fries and Chicken nuggets aren't great when hot, but if they cool, they're terrible- Culver's fries are thicker, don't become small chisels and actually taste good. The burgers are much better and they're made to order. I can go to Culvers and get a really good burger, sub O-rings for fries (not a big jump in price) and they don't add ice to their soft drinks- most fast food places load the cup with ice. A Mushroom-Swiss burger, O-rings and soft drink costs about $9- McDonald's can't touch that as far as flavor.

I found a survey that showed QP/cheese at #1, favored by an actual chef! Must have a grudge against his tongue.
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan

>>>CHAKRABARTI: Alright, let's listen once again to things that Kennedy has said about vaccines. He's obviously been on the record and very clear about still, to this day, believing that vaccines cause autism. There's no scientific evidence that is true. But he's also recently tried to add some nuance to his views. For example, on the Bill Maher Show, he said that he claims he's always believed that if people want vaccines, they should be able to get them.

KENNEDY, Jr.: I'm not anti vaccine. What I say is that --

MAHER: People think you are.

KENNEDY, Jr.: I know, but that's because I'm called that, because it's a way of silencing me.

But I have said for 17 years, I'm not anti-vaccine. I just want good science. I want, people should be able to make informed choices. I am against vaccine mandates.


CHAKRABARTI: So Professor Nuzzo, this claim about wanting good science about vaccines is true. It can be read also as a flat-out rejection of the good science that exists.

We have evidence that his advocacy on this has actually had an impact on people. Specifically, about MMR, the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, and something that happened in American Samoa. Can you tell us about that?

NUZZO: Yes. This new talking point that, I'm not anti vaccines, I just want good data, it really, unfortunately, just is a talking point. It sounds like a very reasonable statement. Who wouldn't disagree with that? Of course, we all want data, but it really stands at odds with his historic stance on vaccines. And even the clip you played in which he bragged about telling people, not to vaccinate their children.

I think speak very clearly. I don't know how you interpret that other than the fact that he is in fact anti vaccine and the real deadly consequences of this can be seen in a very tragic outbreak of measles in American Samoa. So there was a very unfortunate incident in Samoa where two infants died after getting the MMR vaccine and the kind of safety systems that are in place to monitor vaccines to make sure they aren't causing harm snapped into place.

And there was a temporary pause on vaccination efforts in the country until they figured out what was going on. In fact, they found that it wasn't the vaccine itself, but that nurses had accidentally mixed it with something that they weren't supposed to. So something that actually harmed the children.

It was a medication that shouldn't have been given. And so it was really just clinical error, not the vaccine itself. And so once that was realized, there was an effort, of course, to resume the vaccination campaign. But, after that event, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. went to Samoa and met with prominent anti vaxxer there.

It was a pretty kind of publicized event on the channels of that, also wrote a letter to government agencies further calling into question the value, the safety of vaccines and what we then saw was a really explosive outbreak of measles that ultimately killed 83 people, most of whom were toddlers and babies. So as health authorities were desperately trying to make sure people were fully protected against the virus and trying to vaccinate, they were battling the kind of hesitation and fear about the vaccine that anti vaxxers had really spread. And it's really quite tragic and it's something they tried to distance themselves from.

There's a lot of documentation of this.<<<
 
D

Dude#1279435

Audioholic Spartan
Ever go to Culver's or In-N -Out Burger? Fresh ingredients, not frozen and definitely not pre-cooked, much better ingredients and IMO, nothing on McDonald's menu tastes good. I have posted about the last time I had McDonald's and it was not only terrible, it was almost ten bucks. Their fries and Chicken nuggets aren't great when hot, but if they cool, they're terrible- Culver's fries are thicker, don't become small chisels and actually taste good. The burgers are much better and they're made to order. I can go to Culvers and get a really good burger, sub O-rings for fries (not a big jump in price) and they don't add ice to their soft drinks- most fast food places load the cup with ice. A Mushroom-Swiss burger, O-rings and soft drink costs about $9- McDonald's can't touch that as far as flavor.

I found a survey that showed QP/cheese at #1, favored by an actual chef! Must have a grudge against his tongue.
Maybe a better frying oil, or more potato in your fry. That's what the health industry is: a healthier junk food LOL. We don't eat more of what we're suppose to, so your doing your best you can with the Dorito LOL. It isn't even a criticism of the health dept. That's the reality of cost & convenience.
 
highfigh

highfigh

Seriously, I have no life.
Maybe a better frying oil, or more potato in your fry. That's what the health industry is: a healthier junk food LOL. We don't eat more of what we're suppose to, so your doing your best you can with the Dorito LOL. It isn't even a criticism of the health dept. That's the reality of cost & convenience.
The main problem- bad food is cheap and convenient. Potatoes aren't bad, just don't eat a bag full of them in any form. If I go to Culvers or other fast food, and I NEVER go to McDonald's, it might be once in a month.
 
Swerd

Swerd

Audioholic Warlord
Something interesting regarding life expectancy. Seems we’re not doing good at all. In this list, we come in at 48. Being “better than 3rd world nations” doesn’t seem like a very high bar.


While I agree with much of what you say, I don’t totally disagree with rfk. There’s so much noise around everything…
I would be extremely cautious about reading too much into tables like that. It can be meaningful, but at the same time, it can also be meaningless, like comparing apples to oranges. Here are a few reasons why:
  • Those different countries rank from 1 to 54. Seems like a wide range. But their life expectancy estimates range from 85.63 years to 78.49 – a narrow range. The USA's rank may be 48th, but it's life expectancy is 79.46 years.

  • Some of those countries are small with less genetic variation in their population, while others have large populations with a wide range of genetic backgrounds.

  • Some of those countries have universal free medical care and others do not. How does the USA rank among other large countries that lack universal free medical care?

  • Among those 54 different countries, do they all have similarly thorough systems of collecting medical & death records? If they don't, how can you compare life expectancy among them?
 
Trell

Trell

Audioholic Spartan
I would be extremely cautious about reading too much into tables like that. It can be meaningful, but at the same time, it can also be meaningless, like comparing apples to oranges. Here are a few reasons why:
  • Those different countries rank from 1 to 54. Seems like a wide range. But their life expectancy estimates range from 85.63 years to 78.49 – a narrow range. The USA's rank may be 48th, but it's life expectancy is 79.46 years.

  • Some of those countries are small with less genetic variation in their population, while others have large populations with a wide range of genetic backgrounds.

  • Some of those countries have universal free medical care and others do not. How does the USA rank among other large countries that lack universal free medical care?

  • Among those 54 different countries, do they all have similarly thorough systems of collecting medical & death records? If they don't, how can you compare life expectancy among them?
A life expectancy of 73.54 years for an US male is not high. This is from 2021 actuarial table below (latest available) so I assume COVID and the Trump administration handling it, is the major reason for the lowering of life expectancy as compared to 76.22 years in 2019.

We’ll see what the newer report says next year.

With Trump nominating numerous anti-vaxxers to various health positions I fear that US life expectancy will remain low.


Edit: In Sweden life expectancy of a male born in 2023 is 81.6 years.

These are official statistics from https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/statistik-efter-amne/befolkning/befolkningsframskrivningar/befolkningsframskrivningar/pong/tabell-och-diagram/aterstaende-medellivslangd-vid-fodelsen-och-vid-65-ar-efter-kon-samt-framskrivning/

Do note that about 20% of the Swedish population are born abroad.

It's in Swedish but it contains a link to an Excel sheet with headings in both Swedish and English: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/e7adf3fa13414fe2a351cc3f6645f591/be0401_2024i70.xlsx

1732388954269.png
 
Last edited:
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top