Oh, I'm not arguing against climate change. I'm just saying that one storm will tell us nothing about it. You need empirical data collected over decades/centuries to give you the real picture.
That's the whole point of my drawing attention to this.
If you look at that data, there were three massive storms in less then a century, two of which rerouted rivers in a night.
The River Rother changed counties! Even more significant we are talking about the English Channel and the Strait of Dover, not like the East Coast of the US, open to thousands of miles of Ocean.
These storms had to be at least the equal of Sandy and likely worse.
Imagine what the climate change boys would make of it if it happened now.
Now whether not CO2 is having an effect needs to be determined. A climate worsening with any rising occurrence will correlate with anything else on the rise in the same time period. It in no way proves cause and effect.
The we have the anti cow farters. These people are really daft. You have bogs and wetlands constantly producing liters of methane, Just round my property with wetlands in these woods are constantly producing enormous amounts. It is in notions like this, these people loose all credibility with me.
