Krix Speaker discussion

P

privatekepler

Audiophyte
Hello

I have a question for people on the forum with any experience and background with speaker design.

I am curious about 2 speakers from krix

1. NEUPHONIX MK2
Floorstanding - https://www.krix.com.au/product/neuphonix-mk2

2. Megaphonix flat onwall - https://www.krix.com.au/product/megaphonix-flat

I have space for both so it's not one vs the other in terms of sound it's more theoretical question about their design

Question:

1. What is (if any) pro or cons of 2 way vs 3 way design?

2. in NEUPHONIX what is the benefit of having 4x Low Frequency Drivers (5”) and Mid Frequency Driver 1 (5”) coated paper cone. 26mm as compared to MEGAPHONIX FLAT that only has only 1x Low Frequency Driver Single (10”) paper cone driver, and no mid frequency driver, and a high frequency driver?

3.Lastly For these two speakers the Cabinet design (shape, materials, size of drivers) are different and so is the price - how does that translate to real life in terms of sonic performance (not functionality as I know they are design for two different functional purposes)? Movies (which have more dynamic range and diaglouge vs mmusic?

4. If anyone has had same or equivalent speakers and have switched to on wall (for speaker to go behind accoustic transparent screen) would be willing to share their observations for movies and music.

Your input
is much appreciated.
 

Attachments

DigitalDawn

DigitalDawn

Senior Audioholic
Triad makes great OnWall speakers. What is the size of your room (W x D x H)?
 
ski2xblack

ski2xblack

Audioholic Samurai
Those two models represent wildly divergent approaches. The Neuphonix model looks like it follows more of a traditional Toole/Olive/Harman approach, like most domestic speakers, while the Megaphonix appears to be more of a high output, controlled directivity typically used in cinemas or larger venues. Which is right for you all depends on your room, your goals, and determining which is the better tool for the task at hand.

Your questions are pretty broad and concern the range of trade-offs and compromises inherent to speaker design. One of the biggest balancing acts concerns sensitivity, extension, and cabinet size, where achieving two of those criteria comes at the expense of the third. This is referred to as Hoffman's Iron Law. Sensitivity bears directly on the dynamic range goals you're trying to hit. Overall bandwidth, linearity both on and off axis, directivity matching, the overall power response, and more, all factor into design choices, such as driver complement, loading alignment for the enclosures, crossover points between drivers...it's complex, and you would probably need to read Vance Dickeson's book on speaker design for a comprehensive answer to your questions.

Using your two linked examples makes for interesting comparative case studies, particularly given their disparate design choices. You can see some of those design choices in action. Compare the speaker's sensitivities (Megaphonix is far more sensitive), extension (Neuphonix digs a little deeper). Compare the overall bandwith (Neuphonix far more extended in the highs).

Without a full suite of measurements, what follows is just conjecture, but the Neuphonix likely exhibits broad dispersion, while the Megaphonix is more narrow. I suspect the Neuphonix had linearity as a high priority, while the more high output oriented Megaphonix might be a bit less linear. The Neuphonix demands a more burly amp than the super sensitive Megaphonix.

Which is better? Don't know. But they are different tools suited for different implementations. Which is better *for you* depends on your room and what you're trying to accomplish.
 
TLS Guy

TLS Guy

Audioholic Jedi
Hello

I have a question for people on the forum with any experience and background with speaker design.

I am curious about 2 speakers from krix

1. NEUPHONIX MK2
Floorstanding - https://www.krix.com.au/product/neuphonix-mk2

2. Megaphonix flat onwall - https://www.krix.com.au/product/megaphonix-flat

I have space for both so it's not one vs the other in terms of sound it's more theoretical question about their design

Question:

1. What is (if any) pro or cons of 2 way vs 3 way design?

2. in NEUPHONIX what is the benefit of having 4x Low Frequency Drivers (5”) and Mid Frequency Driver 1 (5”) coated paper cone. 26mm as compared to MEGAPHONIX FLAT that only has only 1x Low Frequency Driver Single (10”) paper cone driver, and no mid frequency driver, and a high frequency driver?

3.Lastly For these two speakers the Cabinet design (shape, materials, size of drivers) are different and so is the price - how does that translate to real life in terms of sonic performance (not functionality as I know they are design for two different functional purposes)? Movies (which have more dynamic range and diaglouge vs mmusic?

4. If anyone has had same or equivalent speakers and have switched to on wall (for speaker to go behind accoustic transparent screen) would be willing to share their observations for movies and music.

Your input
is much appreciated.
That outfit is in Australia, and have no US presence, but an installer in Canada. The first speaker is a home speaker. The second for commercial cinemas. It seems that the main line of business for Krix is commercial cinemas. So you don't want the on wall for sure in a domestic situation and I have no idea if their home speakers are any good. Warning: - most speakers are pretty lousy, so you don't want to purchase sight unseen.
 
newsletter

  • RBHsound.com
  • BlueJeansCable.com
  • SVS Sound Subwoofers
  • Experience the Martin Logan Montis
Top